Friday, April 11, 2003
previous entry | main | next entry | TrackBack (0)
The challenge to peaceniks
One of the reasons I supported going to war with Iraq was my confirmed belief that it would, in the long run, spare more lives than it would extinguish. I blogged about this point here, here, and here.
Now that Baghdad has fallen, here’s my question to peaceniks: Are you against killing, or are you against war? Because what happened in Iraq suggests you may have to choose....
Simply put, the number of innocent people who are dead because we ousted Saddam is dwarfed by the number of innocent people who are dead because we didn’t. The use of American force is on one side of the ledger, and mass killing is on the other. Trends in military and media technology make this dilemma increasingly likely where belligerent murderers rule. You can keep your hands clean, or you can keep many more people alive. It’s up to you.
My suspicion is that most of the committed anti-war types loath American power so much that they'll choose to keep their hands clean.
I will beg to differ.posted by Dan on 04.11.03 at 03:29 PM