![]() |
|
Monday, February 2, 2004
previous entry | main | next entry | TrackBack (0)
How high up will this go?
The New York Times reports that the godfather of Pakistan's nuclear weapons program has spilled the beans:
Quick hits: UPDATE: Several commenters are assuming that I'm accepting the Pakistani investigation at face value, when in fact the Musharraf government knew about this all along. Actually, what I think is worthy of mention is that the government has finally admitted that there's a problem. Until two months ago they weren't even willing to do this. Comments: Just curious, Dan: do you believe this? Do you really think this was a serious investigation and the Pakistani government is shocked to learn of this? You can tell from my tone that I don't believe a word of it, but you're the foreign policy expert around here. Do you believe it? posted by: Kevin Drum on 02.02.04 at 01:50 PM [permalink]Ditto Kevin above: I think there are too many loose ends that are conveniently tied up by this development. The whole issue of Pakistani nuclear technology proliferation certainly involved significant portions of the intelligence services and military of the country. To have one person take responsibility for the entire issue is farcical, particularly as the result of an "investigation" conducted by a military dictatorship, where there is no transparency at all. Either there was some serious coercion going on (i.e. torture), or Mr. Khan was happy to oblige the government in some artful misdirection. Bush's intervention in Afganistan and Iraq is the main reason why they even bothered to confess. It sure wasn't the diplomats that they sent over there! posted by: Jim Coomes on 02.02.04 at 01:50 PM [permalink]I think we see only through a glass darkly what is going on with Pakistani politics. Many of the programs Pakistan had underway in defense and foreign policy, including the atomic weapons program and support for the Taliban, were underway before Musharraf came to power. He surely knew something about them, even if he did not know everything. His coup could not have succeeded if he did not have support from within the Army, yet clearly some parts of the military and ISI were pursuing policies independent of the last government. This may have continued under his. At any rate, I doubt someone with Khan's reputation in Pakistan could be made to be a fall guy. At the same time I doubt Bush administration pressure was the only thing prompting Musharraf's government to act. Musharraf is bound to think some of the people who wanted to share Pakistan's atomic secrets with Iran and North Korea share goals with the people who want him dead, and this may be the major reason his people forced a confession out of Khan. Obviously this is all speculation. We really don't know much at all about why people are doing what they are in Pakistan right now. posted by: Zathras on 02.02.04 at 01:50 PM [permalink]remember, there's indo-pak peacetalks scheduled in a couple weeks... also, the atimes reports that: Islamabad has appreciated for some time that, given the latest events involving its scientists, it would come under strong international pressure to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), and open up its facilities to international safeguards and inspections. Neither Pakistan nor nuclear neighbor India have signed the NPT. And worse, there is a strong belief in the corridors of power in Pakistan and the KRL that the US will attempt to force Islamabad to abandon its nuclear program altogether. Consequently, Pakistani authorities have devised a strategy under which they will urge the US to back off their nuclear facilities, in exchange for help in extracting the US from the imbroglio in which it finds itself in neighboring Afghanistan. Developments in Afghanistan strengthen the Pakistan hand. From March this year, as the winter thaw begins, more than ever since September 11, after which Pakistan pledged allegiance to the US in the "war on terror", the US needs Pakistan's help for the safety of the 12,000 international troops in Afghanistan. Intelligence reports confirm that once the ice has melted, the Afghan resistance, comprising al-Qaeda, the Hizb-i-Islami Afghanistan of Gulbuddin Hekmatyr and the Islamic Movement of Taliban, will invite local tribes on both sides of the Pakistan-Afghanistan border to help expel foreign troops and retake major cities lost by the Taliban in late 2001. The tribal aspect of this plan has alarmed Western security officials as US-led forces rely on sections of their support to conduct operations in Afghanistan. Strategists in Islamabad told Asia Times Online that Pakistan would now offer to mediate by soliciting the Taliban - which Pakistan originally helped bring to power in 1996 - to join in a national government and end their resistance. If this works, the US will get a much-desired exit strategy from Afghanistan, and Islamabad will get to keep its nuclear program intact.posted by: gogol13 on 02.02.04 at 01:50 PM [permalink] Today's Washington Post reports that General Musharraf himself has been fingered by A Q Khan. Others include former Army chiefs Gen Beg and Gen Karamat. Of course the Pakistani military spokesman has denied that Gen Musharraf was involved...but if the C-130 was spotted in Pyongyang in 2002 (after he signed up for the War on Terror) how seriously do you think we can take the denials. posted by: Nitin on 02.02.04 at 01:50 PM [permalink]I guess Bush had it wrong. Clearly, Pakistan has been the Axle of Evil. Post a Comment: |
Politics, economics, globalization, academia, pop culture... all from a
Main home page Reviews of DanielDrezner.com: "Sharp but informal commentary on politics and foreign policy." -- The New Republic "Dan Drezner is terrific.... Excellent blog." -- Andrew Sullivan "Dan's stuff is always worth reading." -- Eugene Volokh "One of the essential weblogs." -- Gawker.com "Old battle horse of the blogosphere." -- Jewcy.com "Soft porn." -- Amitai Etzioni "Spawned grave atrocities and vast destruction." -- Glenn Greenwald "Monday morning quarterback... conservative robot... the very foundation of troubles in this country." -- not-so-random readers Contact me at: ddrezner@gmail.com (But click here to read my e-mail policy) Search the Site TNR's Open University Jacob Levy Glenn Reynolds Andrew Sullivan Mickey Kaus Virginia Postrel The Volokh Conspiracy Josh Marshall Crooked Timber OxBlog Real Clear Politics Kevin Drum Across the Aisle Economist's Free Exchange TNR's The Plank NRO's The Corner TAP's Tapped America Abroad Duck of Minerva Opinio Juris Brad DeLong Jeff Jarvis Mystery Pollster Mark Kleiman Meryl Yourish Megan McArdle Marginal Revolution Michael Munger Chris Lawrence Matthew Yglesias Hit and Run Cold Spring Shops Stephen Green Outside the Beltway Pejman Yousefzadeh Laura McKenna (11D) Elected Swineherd Phil Carter Joe Gandelman Winds of Change Andrew Samwick Greg Mankiw Dani Rodrik Roger L. Simon Tom Maguire Greg Djerejian The American Scene Post Global Democracy Arsenal Recent articles online "Foreign Policy Goes Glam."The National Interest, November/December 2007 "Rise of the Hipster Statesmen." Newsweek International, November 1, 2007 "The New New World Order." Foreign Affairs, March/April 2007 "Mind the Gap." The National Interest, January/February 2007 "The Grandest Strategy Of Them All." Washington Post, December 17, 2006 U.S. Trade Strategy: Free Versus Fair Council on Foreign Relations Press, September 2006. Complete online article archive Blog Archives June 2008May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 Academia Area studies Book club culture economics fence-sitting from Blogger globalization homeland security international relations law Mediasphere My very important posts New Republic outsourcing personal politics Sports The blog paper the blogosphere thesis ideas Trade and Development U.S. foreign policy website maintenance See full archives listing Recent Entries • Someone keep Fleet Street away from Bill Clinton• It rivals Buckley vs. Vidal, I tell you • So.... are the Clintons morons? • The New York Times didn't ask me, but then again, that's why I have this blog • Monica Crowley's jet black pot • Al Qaeda is losing • Speaking of karma.... • The blog post that writes itself • What made me laugh today • Where should Hillary go? Site Credits |