Monday, February 2, 2004

previous entry | main | next entry | TrackBack (0)


How high up will this go?

The New York Times reports that the godfather of Pakistan's nuclear weapons program has spilled the beans:

The founder of Pakistan's nuclear weapons program, Abdul Qadeer Khan, has signed a detailed confession admitting that during the last 15 years he provided Iran, North Korea and Libya with the designs and technology to produce the fuel for nuclear weapons, according to a senior Pakistani official and three Pakistani journalists who attended a special government briefing here on Sunday night.

In a two-and-a-half-hour presentation to 20 Pakistani journalists, a senior government official gave an exhaustive and startling account of how Dr. Khan, a national hero, spread secret technology to three countries that have been striving to produce their own nuclear arsenals. Two of them, Iran and North Korea, were among those designated by President Bush as part of an "axis of evil."....

The Bush administration offered no public comment on the Pakistani announcement on Sunday. But in recent weeks, administration officials have said that they forced the government of President Pervez Musharraf to confront the evidence, after Iran and Libya made disclosures that showed their reliance on Pakistani-supplied technology.

"This is the break we have been waiting for," a senior American official said. But the account provided by Pakistani officials carefully avoided pinning any blame on General Musharraf, the army or the Pakistani intelligence service, despite the fact that some of the material — especially what was sent to North Korea — appeared to have been transported on government cargo planes.

Pakistani and American officials have said senior Pakistani Army officials would have known if nuclear hardware had been shipped out of a tightly guarded nuclear facility.

Quick hits:

  • Give the Bush administration some credit for pushing Musharraf into taking action;

  • One wonders whether the information culled from Khan's confession will be useful in severing what appears to be a well-developed black market in nuclear technology.

  • One really wonders whether any Pakistani officials will be implicated. The story suggests that this should happen but won't.
  • UPDATE: Several commenters are assuming that I'm accepting the Pakistani investigation at face value, when in fact the Musharraf government knew about this all along. Actually, what I think is worthy of mention is that the government has finally admitted that there's a problem. Until two months ago they weren't even willing to do this.

    posted by Dan on 02.02.04 at 01:50 PM




    Comments:

    Just curious, Dan: do you believe this? Do you really think this was a serious investigation and the Pakistani government is shocked to learn of this?

    You can tell from my tone that I don't believe a word of it, but you're the foreign policy expert around here. Do you believe it?

    posted by: Kevin Drum on 02.02.04 at 01:50 PM [permalink]



    Ditto Kevin above:
    It seems that the government found a convenient fall guy to put the blame on. This whole idea of "signing a confession" sounds suspicious.

    posted by: Suresh on 02.02.04 at 01:50 PM [permalink]



    I think there are too many loose ends that are conveniently tied up by this development. The whole issue of Pakistani nuclear technology proliferation certainly involved significant portions of the intelligence services and military of the country.

    To have one person take responsibility for the entire issue is farcical, particularly as the result of an "investigation" conducted by a military dictatorship, where there is no transparency at all.

    Either there was some serious coercion going on (i.e. torture), or Mr. Khan was happy to oblige the government in some artful misdirection.

    posted by: Chirag Rabari on 02.02.04 at 01:50 PM [permalink]



    Bush's intervention in Afganistan and Iraq is the main reason why they even bothered to confess. It sure wasn't the diplomats that they sent over there!

    posted by: Jim Coomes on 02.02.04 at 01:50 PM [permalink]



    I think we see only through a glass darkly what is going on with Pakistani politics. Many of the programs Pakistan had underway in defense and foreign policy, including the atomic weapons program and support for the Taliban, were underway before Musharraf came to power. He surely knew something about them, even if he did not know everything. His coup could not have succeeded if he did not have support from within the Army, yet clearly some parts of the military and ISI were pursuing policies independent of the last government. This may have continued under his.

    At any rate, I doubt someone with Khan's reputation in Pakistan could be made to be a fall guy. At the same time I doubt Bush administration pressure was the only thing prompting Musharraf's government to act. Musharraf is bound to think some of the people who wanted to share Pakistan's atomic secrets with Iran and North Korea share goals with the people who want him dead, and this may be the major reason his people forced a confession out of Khan.

    Obviously this is all speculation. We really don't know much at all about why people are doing what they are in Pakistan right now.

    posted by: Zathras on 02.02.04 at 01:50 PM [permalink]



    remember, there's indo-pak peacetalks scheduled in a couple weeks...

    also, the atimes reports that:

    Islamabad has appreciated for some time that, given the latest events involving its scientists, it would come under strong international pressure to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), and open up its facilities to international safeguards and inspections. Neither Pakistan nor nuclear neighbor India have signed the NPT. And worse, there is a strong belief in the corridors of power in Pakistan and the KRL that the US will attempt to force Islamabad to abandon its nuclear program altogether.
    Consequently, Pakistani authorities have devised a strategy under which they will urge the US to back off their nuclear facilities, in exchange for help in extracting the US from the imbroglio in which it finds itself in neighboring Afghanistan.
    Developments in Afghanistan strengthen the Pakistan hand. From March this year, as the winter thaw begins, more than ever since September 11, after which Pakistan pledged allegiance to the US in the "war on terror", the US needs Pakistan's help for the safety of the 12,000 international troops in Afghanistan.
    Intelligence reports confirm that once the ice has melted, the Afghan resistance, comprising al-Qaeda, the Hizb-i-Islami Afghanistan of Gulbuddin Hekmatyr and the Islamic Movement of Taliban, will invite local tribes on both sides of the Pakistan-Afghanistan border to help expel foreign troops and retake major cities lost by the Taliban in late 2001.
    The tribal aspect of this plan has alarmed Western security officials as US-led forces rely on sections of their support to conduct operations in Afghanistan. Strategists in Islamabad told Asia Times Online that Pakistan would now offer to mediate by soliciting the Taliban - which Pakistan originally helped bring to power in 1996 - to join in a national government and end their resistance.
    If this works, the US will get a much-desired exit strategy from Afghanistan, and Islamabad will get to keep its nuclear program intact.
    posted by: gogol13 on 02.02.04 at 01:50 PM [permalink]



    Today's Washington Post reports that General Musharraf himself has been fingered by A Q Khan. Others include former Army chiefs Gen Beg and Gen Karamat.

    Of course the Pakistani military spokesman has denied that Gen Musharraf was involved...but if the C-130 was spotted in Pyongyang in 2002 (after he signed up for the War on Terror) how seriously do you think we can take the denials.

    posted by: Nitin on 02.02.04 at 01:50 PM [permalink]



    I guess Bush had it wrong.

    Clearly, Pakistan has been the Axle of Evil.

    posted by: Jon H on 02.02.04 at 01:50 PM [permalink]






    Post a Comment:

    Name:


    Email Address:


    URL:




    Comments:


    Remember your info?





    Politics, economics, globalization, academia, pop culture... all from a untenured tenured perspective

    Main home page
    Main blog page
    About Me
    Search My Blog
    Favorite Blogs
    Book Recommendations
    Books of the Month (Summer 2008)






    Reviews of DanielDrezner.com:

    "Sharp but informal commentary on politics and foreign policy." -- The New Republic

    "Dan Drezner is terrific.... Excellent blog." -- Andrew Sullivan

    "Dan's stuff is always worth reading." -- Eugene Volokh

    "One of the essential weblogs." -- Gawker.com

    "Old battle horse of the blogosphere." -- Jewcy.com

    "Soft porn." -- Amitai Etzioni

    "Spawned grave atrocities and vast destruction." -- Glenn Greenwald

    "Monday morning quarterback... conservative robot... the very foundation of troubles in this country." -- not-so-random readers


    Contact me at:
    ddrezner@gmail.com
    (But click here to read my e-mail policy)









    Search the Site


    Try advanced site search









    Favorite Blogs

    TNR's Open University
    Jacob Levy
    Glenn Reynolds
    Andrew Sullivan
    Mickey Kaus
    Virginia Postrel
    The Volokh Conspiracy
    Josh Marshall
    Crooked Timber
    OxBlog
    Real Clear Politics
    Kevin Drum
    Across the Aisle
    Economist's Free Exchange
    TNR's The Plank
    NRO's The Corner
    TAP's Tapped
    America Abroad
    Duck of Minerva
    Opinio Juris
    Brad DeLong

    Jeff Jarvis
    Mystery Pollster
    Mark Kleiman
    Meryl Yourish
    Megan McArdle
    Marginal Revolution
    Michael Munger
    Chris Lawrence
    Matthew Yglesias
    Hit and Run
    Cold Spring Shops
    Stephen Green
    Outside the Beltway
    Pejman Yousefzadeh
    Laura McKenna (11D)
    Elected Swineherd
    Phil Carter
    Joe Gandelman
    Winds of Change
    Andrew Samwick
    Greg Mankiw
    Dani Rodrik
    Roger L. Simon
    Tom Maguire
    Greg Djerejian
    The American Scene
    Post Global
    Democracy Arsenal




    Recent articles online

    "Foreign Policy Goes Glam."
    The National Interest, November/December 2007

    "Rise of the Hipster Statesmen."
    Newsweek International, November 1, 2007

    "The New New World Order."
    Foreign Affairs, March/April 2007

    "Mind the Gap."
    The National Interest, January/February 2007

    "The Grandest Strategy Of Them All."
    Washington Post, December 17, 2006

    U.S. Trade Strategy: Free Versus Fair
    Council on Foreign Relations Press, September 2006.

    Complete online article archive




    Blog Archives

    June 2008
    May 2008
    April 2008
    March 2008
    February 2008
    January 2008
    December 2007
    November 2007
    October 2007
    September 2007
    August 2007
    July 2007
    June 2007
    May 2007
    April 2007
    March 2007
    February 2007
    January 2007
    December 2006
    November 2006
    October 2006
    September 2006
    August 2006
    July 2006
    June 2006
    May 2006
    April 2006
    March 2006
    February 2006
    January 2006
    December 2005
    November 2005
    October 2005
    September 2005
    August 2005
    July 2005
    June 2005
    May 2005
    April 2005
    March 2005
    February 2005
    January 2005
    December 2004
    November 2004
    October 2004
    September 2004
    August 2004
    July 2004
    June 2004
    May 2004
    April 2004
    March 2004
    February 2004
    January 2004
    December 2003
    November 2003
    October 2003
    September 2003
    August 2003
    July 2003
    June 2003
    May 2003
    April 2003
    March 2003
    February 2003
    January 2003
    December 2002
    November 2002
    October 2002
    September 2002

    Academia
    Area studies
    Book club
    culture
    economics
    fence-sitting
    from Blogger
    globalization
    homeland security
    international relations
    law
    Mediasphere
    My very important posts
    New Republic
    outsourcing
    personal
    politics
    Sports
    The blog paper
    the blogosphere
    thesis ideas
    Trade and Development
    U.S. foreign policy
    website maintenance

    See full archives listing




    Recent Entries

    Someone keep Fleet Street away from Bill Clinton
    It rivals Buckley vs. Vidal, I tell you
    So.... are the Clintons morons?
    The New York Times didn't ask me, but then again, that's why I have this blog
    Monica Crowley's jet black pot
    Al Qaeda is losing
    Speaking of karma....
    The blog post that writes itself
    What made me laugh today
    Where should Hillary go?




    Site Credits