![]() |
|
Friday, March 5, 2004
previous entry | main | next entry | TrackBack (2)
Insert your own EU joke here
According to the Financial Times, many citizens of the new European Union entrants literally cannot understand the acquis communautaire:
posted by Dan on 03.05.04 at 05:36 PM Comments: Fishing for insta-links again, Dan? posted by: Senior Administration Official on 03.05.04 at 05:36 PM [permalink]"...a shortage of translators..." If taken to mean English-"national language" translators, it doesn't augur well for the short-term economic future of these new EU economies. Business/diplomacy will surely produce tons more pages in need of translation, what then ? posted by: ch2 on 03.05.04 at 05:36 PM [permalink]If "EU laws are only enforceable in the new member states when written in the national tongue", perhaps this is intentional, part of a strategy of getting the benefits of EU accession without the pesky need to observe all of the regulations. posted by: Curt Wilson on 03.05.04 at 05:36 PM [permalink]Wouldn't work - when the FT says that laws aren't enforceable, it means they're not enforceable against individual citizens. They're still enforceable against the governments, and the state itself can be whacked with fines by the European Court of Justice for failing to bring the laws into effect. So it's not really in any country's interest to fail to translate the back catalogue of EU law. It's just a genuinely huge and unwieldy exercise. posted by: Paul O'Brien on 03.05.04 at 05:36 PM [permalink]"EU laws are only enforceable in the new member states when written in the national tongue." Sounds like a feature, not a bug. posted by: Richard A. Heddleson on 03.05.04 at 05:36 PM [permalink]"EU laws are only enforceable in the new member states when written in the national tongue." Sounds like a feature, not a bug. A feature when it was introduced in the first place, perhaps. The EEC of 6, with four languages between six states (French, German, Italian, Dutch) is a rather different animal from the EU-23/25. posted by: Randy McDonald on 03.05.04 at 05:36 PM [permalink]Q: How many EU ministers does it take to change a light bulb? A: It would take just one of them, but they can't do it since the EU manual for changing light bulbs hasn't been translated into their native language yet. ;-) posted by: Oldman on 03.05.04 at 05:36 PM [permalink]Sounds like a great opportunity to outsource translation services to low cost labor in some of the many former European colonies. posted by: Buck Smith on 03.05.04 at 05:36 PM [permalink]The EU: Where Ignorance of the Law is, indeed, a legal excuse. posted by: Mike on 03.05.04 at 05:36 PM [permalink]Heck . . . why not just defer to the translation in le France? I'm sure it's superior anyway . . . posted by: Kerf on 03.05.04 at 05:36 PM [permalink]It is the European way. A law is only really a law when someone needs to use it. It is not like we need police ensuring that we abide by laws, its when laws are broken that they come into play. It looks like a deliberate legal way for the nascent states to fit into the EU without ruffling feathers when they fail the understand the rigorous niceties that cosying up with the French may require or if you want to know, for example, what Mr Blair means exactly. Latitude rules, okay? posted by: Nicholas on 03.05.04 at 05:36 PM [permalink]See, they should have just stuck with having all the laws written in Latin. 20-20 hindsight, I suppose. posted by: Chris Lawrence on 03.05.04 at 05:36 PM [permalink]Am I the only one who finds the notion of an 85,000 page rulebook mentally ill? Europe, Deranged since like forever. posted by: linden on 03.05.04 at 05:36 PM [permalink]What language was it written in originally? Probably English. So just everybody switch to English and we'll all live happily ever after. If it was written in French, toss it out and start all over again. People who speak a language that has no word for 80 and calls it two times forty and 85 two times forty plus five are insane and can't be trusted with anything as important as the rules for the EU. This says a lot about what's wrong with the EU. The US Constitution has lasted for more than 200 years and it's only a few pages long. posted by: Ben on 03.05.04 at 05:36 PM [permalink]You are comparing apples to watermelons. Go count the pages to the US Code, or better yet, the regulations to title 26 (the Internal Revenue Code), not to mention the Revenue Rulings, Revenue Procedures, Private Letter Rulings etc. etc. BTW, eighty in French is four twenties. ;0 posted by: TexasToast on 03.05.04 at 05:36 PM [permalink]Windows users will understand what EU stands for: Escape, Undo. posted by: Bithead on 03.05.04 at 05:36 PM [permalink]The embarrassing disclosure could have serious legal consequences, because EU laws are only enforceable in the new member states when written in the national tongue. This isn't true. Someone's got the wrong end of the stick here. posted by: dsquared on 03.05.04 at 05:36 PM [permalink]erp, I'm sure you've once received the e-mail with all these jokes about the incongruities of the English language (a few examples below). According to your logic, we should discard English as well and switch to German. Finally, regarding 80: some french speakers don't use 4X20 but instead use either "octante" (Swiss) or "huitante" (Belgian). Jokes (from Richard Lederer's book, Crazy English): :) posted by: ch2 on 03.05.04 at 05:36 PM [permalink]The correct comparison would be with the United States Code of Federal Regulations, which is quite large and may be more than 85,000 pages. More to the point is the wisdom of the Arkansas Traveler. Roof don't leak if it don't rain and I can't fix it if it's raining. I'm still short the EU. posted by: Robert Schwartz on 03.05.04 at 05:36 PM [permalink]Post a Comment: |
Politics, economics, globalization, academia, pop culture... all from a
Main home page Reviews of DanielDrezner.com: "Sharp but informal commentary on politics and foreign policy." -- The New Republic "Dan Drezner is terrific.... Excellent blog." -- Andrew Sullivan "Dan's stuff is always worth reading." -- Eugene Volokh "One of the essential weblogs." -- Gawker.com "Old battle horse of the blogosphere." -- Jewcy.com "Soft porn." -- Amitai Etzioni "Spawned grave atrocities and vast destruction." -- Glenn Greenwald "Monday morning quarterback... conservative robot... the very foundation of troubles in this country." -- not-so-random readers Contact me at: ddrezner@gmail.com (But click here to read my e-mail policy) Search the Site TNR's Open University Jacob Levy Glenn Reynolds Andrew Sullivan Mickey Kaus Virginia Postrel The Volokh Conspiracy Josh Marshall Crooked Timber OxBlog Real Clear Politics Kevin Drum Across the Aisle Economist's Free Exchange TNR's The Plank NRO's The Corner TAP's Tapped America Abroad Duck of Minerva Opinio Juris Brad DeLong Jeff Jarvis Mystery Pollster Mark Kleiman Meryl Yourish Megan McArdle Marginal Revolution Michael Munger Chris Lawrence Matthew Yglesias Hit and Run Cold Spring Shops Stephen Green Outside the Beltway Pejman Yousefzadeh Laura McKenna (11D) Elected Swineherd Phil Carter Joe Gandelman Winds of Change Andrew Samwick Greg Mankiw Dani Rodrik Roger L. Simon Tom Maguire Greg Djerejian The American Scene Post Global Democracy Arsenal Recent articles online "Foreign Policy Goes Glam."The National Interest, November/December 2007 "Rise of the Hipster Statesmen." Newsweek International, November 1, 2007 "The New New World Order." Foreign Affairs, March/April 2007 "Mind the Gap." The National Interest, January/February 2007 "The Grandest Strategy Of Them All." Washington Post, December 17, 2006 U.S. Trade Strategy: Free Versus Fair Council on Foreign Relations Press, September 2006. Complete online article archive Blog Archives June 2008May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 Academia Area studies Book club culture economics fence-sitting from Blogger globalization homeland security international relations law Mediasphere My very important posts New Republic outsourcing personal politics Sports The blog paper the blogosphere thesis ideas Trade and Development U.S. foreign policy website maintenance See full archives listing Recent Entries • Someone keep Fleet Street away from Bill Clinton• It rivals Buckley vs. Vidal, I tell you • So.... are the Clintons morons? • The New York Times didn't ask me, but then again, that's why I have this blog • Monica Crowley's jet black pot • Al Qaeda is losing • Speaking of karma.... • The blog post that writes itself • What made me laugh today • Where should Hillary go? Site Credits |