Wednesday, June 9, 2004

previous entry | main | next entry | TrackBack (2)


My selfish reason for supporting gay marriage

From a purely selfish perspective, I shouldn't give a rat's ass one way or the other about the ability of gay Americans to get married. I'm not gay; I wasn't prevented from getting hitched. I think the argument that gay marriage undercuts the institution is hogwash, so whether it's legal shouldn't matter to me. I would derive some empathetic pleasure from seeing gay friends getting married, but that hasn't happened yet, so no effect there. There are many excellent reasons to support it, but none of them would appear to affect me directly.

However, The Onion reminds me of one personal incentive to support gay marriage with their fake news story, "Gay Couple Feels Pressured to Marry.":

Ever since last month, when Massachusetts became the first state to allow same-sex weddings, parents, friends, and coworkers have been pressuring Kristin Burton and her girlfriend Laura Miyatake to marry, the couple of 14 months said Monday.

"As soon as the news coverage about gay marriage started, my mom called me up," said Burton, who works as a nursing-home administrator. "Of course, she didn't directly ask me when I was going to marry Laura. First, she asked how Laura and I were getting along, and how business was at Laura's shop. But then she reminded me about my dad's heart disease and told me that he could go at any time. When she started to talk about how nice it was at my brother's wedding, I told her I was late for my yoga class."

Burton and Miyatake said they never expected the court's decision to add so much tension to their relationship.

"It seems like just yesterday I was annoyed because straight people were awkwardly asking if we were 'friends' or 'partners,'" Miyatake said. "Now, every convenience-store clerk who guesses we're gay asks us if we're going to get married under the new law. It's sort of a touchy subject, okay?"

The ability to ask my gay friends and colleagues when they're planning to get hitched and watch them squirm with discomfort answering the question -- that's going to be enjoyable.

posted by Dan on 06.09.04 at 02:04 PM




Comments:

EVERYONE's a winner. As P.J. O'Rourke observed, if you let gays get married, soon they'll be having children, going to church, boycotting HBO, advocating school vouchers and voting Republican.

posted by: Lex on 06.09.04 at 02:04 PM [permalink]



Your post raises the question of how the gay community will deal with comments like "When are you going to make me a grandmother?"

Marriage is a fickle beast. Good Luck to all who enter into it.

posted by: J. W. Patterson on 06.09.04 at 02:04 PM [permalink]



Dan,

Great Post. Don't you feel out of place in the Republican Party today?

posted by: Rich on 06.09.04 at 02:04 PM [permalink]



Having been on the receiving end of your questioning, I feel that I can in good conscience only support a gay marriage law that includes an anti-harassment provision. ;-)

posted by: Jane Galt on 06.09.04 at 02:04 PM [permalink]



"As P.J. O'Rourke observed, if you let gays get married, soon they'll be having children.."

?????

I still say that marriage is a long-established institution, and that we tinker with it at our peril.

Civil unions, with all the legal protections - and responsibilities - that every other married couple has: certainly. But simply calling a dog a cat is not going to change the dog.

(The "rights" issue is a joke. Gays have exactly and precisely the same rights as everyone else: to marry anyone of the opposite sex that agrees.)

posted by: Mike on 06.09.04 at 02:04 PM [permalink]



Funny, very funny!

posted by: Jc on 06.09.04 at 02:04 PM [permalink]



Attachment theory: like straights--sort of--marriage gets them off the streets and out of the bars. The right step for straights; surely the right one for gays.

thelrd in TEXAS

posted by: Larry Davis on 06.09.04 at 02:04 PM [permalink]



Mike: Gays have exactly and precisely the same rights as everyone else: to marry anyone of the opposite sex that agrees.

So if the situation were reversed, and the law permitted just same-sex couples to marry, everybody would have exactly the same rights?

As for civil unions, I thought Max Boot had a good point (registration required):

Since the ultimate concern of conservatives is to preserve the institution of marriage, they would probably be better off caving on gay marriage rather than acceding to the most popular alternative: civil union. Gay marriages won't affect straights. But if civil union laws were to catch on, as Jonathan Rauch argues in his provocative new book, "Gay Marriage," many heterosexuals would probably eschew marriage altogether. That would be worse for society than seeing Rosie O'Donnell get hitched.

posted by: fling93 on 06.09.04 at 02:04 PM [permalink]



Dan,

What would you say to a descrimination lawsuit by a gay couple against an adoption agency that prefers a hetero couple soley on the basis of sexual orientation.

I do not believe there has been enough study on the welfare of children living in gay household. It's simply too soon to make the judgement. Child rearing is what marriage is all about. Some seem not to recognize this.

posted by: Brian on 06.09.04 at 02:04 PM [permalink]



Child rearing is what marriage is all about. Some seem not to recognize this.

Well, Tony, as I'm married and rearing children, I suppose at first blush I might be inclined to agree with you.

But then I consider our married friends with no children (and no desire to have them); our unmarried straight friends happily and successfully rearing children; and our perforce unmarried gay friends doing the same. And then I ask, 'Your point was...?'

Bringing up children is often one of the most important things about marriage. Had you said that, I would have agreed with you, rather than dismissing you as somebody with distorted views (or, at best, somebody who hasn't fully thought through what he said).

posted by: Mrs Tilton on 06.09.04 at 02:04 PM [permalink]



Well, Tony...

Emmm... Brian, not Tony (whoever that might be). Sorry about that. Can't explain the mix-up; clearly I ought to be better about fully reading through what I write before hitting 'Post'.

posted by: Mrs Tilton on 06.09.04 at 02:04 PM [permalink]



how does this fit in with Rush Limbaugh's third marriage failing?

posted by: Andrew J. Lazarus on 06.09.04 at 02:04 PM [permalink]



Ha, lovely point, man.

I am gay and in looking for pro-gay marriage points, I found your post here.

Gotta say...that last line there said it all. The way I saw was...you're asking your gay friends about when they hitched? That's exactly what this country needs! More diversity and no total rejection of one's lifestyle. If a gay person has straight friends and is engaged, how does that make him different? He'll have to face all the troubles of marriage, just like straight couples do.

This nation has to get its face out of its own ass and wake up to the truth: marriage is marriage. It should not matter if it's heterosexual or homosexual.

posted by: Paul Vlosich on 06.09.04 at 02:04 PM [permalink]






Post a Comment:

Name:


Email Address:


URL:




Comments:


Remember your info?





Politics, economics, globalization, academia, pop culture... all from a untenured tenured perspective

Main home page
Main blog page
About Me
Search My Blog
Favorite Blogs
Book Recommendations
Books of the Month (Summer 2008)






Reviews of DanielDrezner.com:

"Sharp but informal commentary on politics and foreign policy." -- The New Republic

"Dan Drezner is terrific.... Excellent blog." -- Andrew Sullivan

"Dan's stuff is always worth reading." -- Eugene Volokh

"One of the essential weblogs." -- Gawker.com

"Old battle horse of the blogosphere." -- Jewcy.com

"Soft porn." -- Amitai Etzioni

"Spawned grave atrocities and vast destruction." -- Glenn Greenwald

"Monday morning quarterback... conservative robot... the very foundation of troubles in this country." -- not-so-random readers


Contact me at:
ddrezner@gmail.com
(But click here to read my e-mail policy)









Search the Site


Try advanced site search









Favorite Blogs

TNR's Open University
Jacob Levy
Glenn Reynolds
Andrew Sullivan
Mickey Kaus
Virginia Postrel
The Volokh Conspiracy
Josh Marshall
Crooked Timber
OxBlog
Real Clear Politics
Kevin Drum
Across the Aisle
Economist's Free Exchange
TNR's The Plank
NRO's The Corner
TAP's Tapped
America Abroad
Duck of Minerva
Opinio Juris
Brad DeLong

Jeff Jarvis
Mystery Pollster
Mark Kleiman
Meryl Yourish
Megan McArdle
Marginal Revolution
Michael Munger
Chris Lawrence
Matthew Yglesias
Hit and Run
Cold Spring Shops
Stephen Green
Outside the Beltway
Pejman Yousefzadeh
Laura McKenna (11D)
Elected Swineherd
Phil Carter
Joe Gandelman
Winds of Change
Andrew Samwick
Greg Mankiw
Dani Rodrik
Roger L. Simon
Tom Maguire
Greg Djerejian
The American Scene
Post Global
Democracy Arsenal




Recent articles online

"Foreign Policy Goes Glam."
The National Interest, November/December 2007

"Rise of the Hipster Statesmen."
Newsweek International, November 1, 2007

"The New New World Order."
Foreign Affairs, March/April 2007

"Mind the Gap."
The National Interest, January/February 2007

"The Grandest Strategy Of Them All."
Washington Post, December 17, 2006

U.S. Trade Strategy: Free Versus Fair
Council on Foreign Relations Press, September 2006.

Complete online article archive




Blog Archives

June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002

Academia
Area studies
Book club
culture
economics
fence-sitting
from Blogger
globalization
homeland security
international relations
law
Mediasphere
My very important posts
New Republic
outsourcing
personal
politics
Sports
The blog paper
the blogosphere
thesis ideas
Trade and Development
U.S. foreign policy
website maintenance

See full archives listing




Recent Entries

Someone keep Fleet Street away from Bill Clinton
It rivals Buckley vs. Vidal, I tell you
So.... are the Clintons morons?
The New York Times didn't ask me, but then again, that's why I have this blog
Monica Crowley's jet black pot
Al Qaeda is losing
Speaking of karma....
The blog post that writes itself
What made me laugh today
Where should Hillary go?




Site Credits