![]() |
|
Wednesday, July 7, 2004
previous entry | main | next entry | TrackBack (6)
Minä haluan toisen kupin kahvia!
Pop quiz -- which country has the highest rate of coffee consumption in the world? The language used in the post title is your clue. Answer below the fold.... It's Finland!! This fact comes from Janet Helm in today's Chicago Tribune, who writes about the health benefits that come from coffee consumption. The highlights:
Before anyone starts consuming Brad DeLongish or Jacob Levyesque levels of coffee, be sure to read the caveat:
Comments: Your Finnish is a bit off. It should be: "Minä haluan toisen kupin kahvia." posted by: Juha Seppälä on 07.07.04 at 11:36 AM [permalink]Klingon is *not* a country, you f'n earth weasel! posted by: Klaatu on 07.07.04 at 11:36 AM [permalink]Correction made -- that's what I get for using a new web translation page. Intriguingly, that same site translates your phrase into: "Ego desirous secondly kupin coffee!" posted by: Dan Drezner on 07.07.04 at 11:36 AM [permalink]I spent two weeks in eastern Finland last year, in the city of Joensuu. Some thought that I drank a lot of coffee. Makes me think... posted by: Dennis Josefsson on 07.07.04 at 11:36 AM [permalink]It's the climate, and the grey skies. My mother, a Swede, drank it by the gallon. She was a spidery little woman; somehow, the cup would hold still even when her fingers would shake. Along about the eighth or ninth cup (for the day), she might say: "Somehow, coffee doesn't taste as good as it used to ..." posted by: Buce on 07.07.04 at 11:36 AM [permalink]You learn something new every day. In honor of the Finnish people's shared addiction, I have put an extra pot on this morning. =) posted by: russ on 07.07.04 at 11:36 AM [permalink]Does Finland have a Starbucks yet? posted by: Zach on 07.07.04 at 11:36 AM [permalink]I hear there's also a direct correlation between coffee consumption and trips to the john. Er, if you'll excuse me... posted by: Michael Ubaldi on 07.07.04 at 11:36 AM [permalink]Worse, note that the "Strawberries & Crème" has NO COFFEE, it has "Strawberries and milk blended with ice, topped with whipped cream." posted by: mitt on 07.07.04 at 11:36 AM [permalink]Those men who drank 10 or more cups lowered their risk by 55 percent... ...And increased their risk of spontaneously drumming "Wipeout" on their dashboards 87 percent. posted by: Fresh Air on 07.07.04 at 11:36 AM [permalink]Dan, you're wrong. Thanks to me, the US has the highest rate. I'm the jackpot number that was never polled. posted by: ch2 on 07.07.04 at 11:36 AM [permalink]Creo que les puede interesar. Claude Hmmm: correlation vs causality... A deeper cause perhaps: Maybe orally(*) nevrotic people who deal with it by downing coffee more so than by downing calories(snacks, alcohol)..put less stress on their blood-sugar regulating system over time. Us orals eat a lot of carbo bombs impulsively while on empty stomachs, asking our pancreas and company to intercept a vertical takeoff in blood sugar. (*) By orally, yeah I am thinking in pseudoFreudian terms. Those same tendancies could also appear as verbosity, chewing on stuff, typing lots and lots of email, elaborating boring inconsequential comments on blogs, addressed at people you don't know, oops sorry, my espresso machine is ready to go again, so I'll just hit "send" here, no wait! PS. coffee is supposed tobe good for your teeth too, had to throw that in. Oh, and PPPS, did they control whether/how much sugar these people were putting in their coffee?.. posted by: Bryan Travis on 07.07.04 at 11:36 AM [permalink]The data are correlational, and it's easy to imagine explanations in terms of something like lifestyle - for example, people who drink more coffee may have more income, more education, and more knowledge about nutrition. Especially with the quantities this report calls for - where I work, ten cups of coffee per workday would run about $2500 per year, and those are after-tax dollars. Still, it may also be that coffee has this effect. The way to tell is to do some animal work - if you have an animal model of diabetes, randomly assign animals of that type to big doses of coffee or no coffee and check both groups for diabetes after some time. With the human correlational data, the animal experimental data, and a plausible biological mechanism, you could draw the cause-effect conclusion. posted by: Patrick Brown on 07.07.04 at 11:36 AM [permalink]The diabetes link: perhaps when you drink coffee, you're not stuffing your fat face or pouring corn syrup down your neck (i.e. Coke/Pepsi) posted by: Smarty Pants on 07.07.04 at 11:36 AM [permalink]just a comment on correlation and income levels. having lived in the Balkans and eastern Europe for several years, i can say that many people will sacrifice almost anything as long as they have bread and coffee. in the Balkans, Turkish coffee (do they get a better health pay-off because the bean is actually floating around in the cup?) is the drink of choice at any given time of the day, and even the poorest pensioner has her morning and afternoon coffee. i don't think income correlates for a large part of the coffee-drinking world. posted by: RW on 07.07.04 at 11:36 AM [permalink]It has quite a strong correlation at low income levels. In many coffee-producing countries coffee drinking is not that common. Coffee consumption in Peru, for example, is low (most goes for export). By comparison, in much more affluent Costa Rica, where I live, coffee consumption is huge. Ticos wouldn't know what to do without their morning cafecito. Pretty much everyone I know, for example, drinks at least three to four mugs (not cups) per day. In my office of thirteen people, the industrial size drip machine gets refilled twice per day. Weekends are a treat for me when I get through about three litres of gourmet coffee brewed in my stainless steel cafetière (the choice of connoisseurs.) Of course it helps that Costa Rica produces some of the finest quality beans on the planet and I can buy a 12oz bag of shade-grown SHB Arabica for four bucks. posted by: David Gillies on 07.07.04 at 11:36 AM [permalink]When I first moved to Sweden, I got a wicked coffee buzz, making the rounds to visit my in-laws. Herregud! Vilket starkt kaffe! posted by: Karen on 07.07.04 at 11:36 AM [permalink]Post a Comment: |
Politics, economics, globalization, academia, pop culture... all from a
Main home page Reviews of DanielDrezner.com: "Sharp but informal commentary on politics and foreign policy." -- The New Republic "Dan Drezner is terrific.... Excellent blog." -- Andrew Sullivan "Dan's stuff is always worth reading." -- Eugene Volokh "One of the essential weblogs." -- Gawker.com "Old battle horse of the blogosphere." -- Jewcy.com "Soft porn." -- Amitai Etzioni "Spawned grave atrocities and vast destruction." -- Glenn Greenwald "Monday morning quarterback... conservative robot... the very foundation of troubles in this country." -- not-so-random readers Contact me at: ddrezner@gmail.com (But click here to read my e-mail policy) Search the Site TNR's Open University Jacob Levy Glenn Reynolds Andrew Sullivan Mickey Kaus Virginia Postrel The Volokh Conspiracy Josh Marshall Crooked Timber OxBlog Real Clear Politics Kevin Drum Across the Aisle Economist's Free Exchange TNR's The Plank NRO's The Corner TAP's Tapped America Abroad Duck of Minerva Opinio Juris Brad DeLong Jeff Jarvis Mystery Pollster Mark Kleiman Meryl Yourish Megan McArdle Marginal Revolution Michael Munger Chris Lawrence Matthew Yglesias Hit and Run Cold Spring Shops Stephen Green Outside the Beltway Pejman Yousefzadeh Laura McKenna (11D) Elected Swineherd Phil Carter Joe Gandelman Winds of Change Andrew Samwick Greg Mankiw Dani Rodrik Roger L. Simon Tom Maguire Greg Djerejian The American Scene Post Global Democracy Arsenal Recent articles online "Foreign Policy Goes Glam."The National Interest, November/December 2007 "Rise of the Hipster Statesmen." Newsweek International, November 1, 2007 "The New New World Order." Foreign Affairs, March/April 2007 "Mind the Gap." The National Interest, January/February 2007 "The Grandest Strategy Of Them All." Washington Post, December 17, 2006 U.S. Trade Strategy: Free Versus Fair Council on Foreign Relations Press, September 2006. Complete online article archive Blog Archives June 2008May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 Academia Area studies Book club culture economics fence-sitting from Blogger globalization homeland security international relations law Mediasphere My very important posts New Republic outsourcing personal politics Sports The blog paper the blogosphere thesis ideas Trade and Development U.S. foreign policy website maintenance See full archives listing Recent Entries • Someone keep Fleet Street away from Bill Clinton• It rivals Buckley vs. Vidal, I tell you • So.... are the Clintons morons? • The New York Times didn't ask me, but then again, that's why I have this blog • Monica Crowley's jet black pot • Al Qaeda is losing • Speaking of karma.... • The blog post that writes itself • What made me laugh today • Where should Hillary go? Site Credits |