![]() |
|
Thursday, July 8, 2004
previous entry | main | next entry | TrackBack (1)
The latest cosmic mystery
Academy Award-winning actress Nicole Kidman is having trouble meeting available men, according to the Associated Press:
So, basically, Miss Kidman -- who has some noteworthy professional accomplishments on her vita and is by many accounts a charming conversationalist -- is having difficulties finding a kid-friendly boyfriend of a suitable age. Let's take another gander at Nicole:
Right. Possible explanations for this eligible bachelor gap:
posted by Dan on 07.08.04 at 04:18 PM Comments: Saw this on a poster once. The text, overlaid onto a picture of a stunning woman, read: "Remember, no matter how sexy she is, no matter how beautiful she is, no matter how alluring she is, someone, somewhere, is tired of her shit." Maybe that's what's at work here. Or a sabotage campaign by the Scientologists. posted by: Steve in Houston on 07.08.04 at 04:18 PM [permalink]Or, single men over the age of 30 all know Nicole's former husband, if they're connected to the movie business. Or they're not connected to the movie business, and don't like her movies. Or they think most movie stars have to be a little crazy no matter what they look like (and let's face it...). Or they don't like being photographed by the paperazzi and called by the National Enquirer after the first date. Maybe it's not the kids, it's the career. I remember what an A-list couple Elizabeth Taylor and John Warner were, back in the day, before he got elected to the Senate and she discovered that all of the people at Washington parties only wanted to talk to him. That's not really on-topic, I just thought it was amusing at the time. posted by: Zathras on 07.08.04 at 04:18 PM [permalink]Similar to the above, possibility 4: Single men over 30 may have had previous experience with women who know they are attractive. The risk of "But y'know, she could be different" may still be too high. posted by: Assistant Village Idiot on 07.08.04 at 04:18 PM [permalink]Or, maybe, Nicole has no interest in 99% of men in the world. Maybe she only wants to meet men who are rich, gorgeous and, in general, on her level. That reduces the pool considerably to CEOs, athletes and other movie stars. And, really, how many guys are going to have the cojones to try to meet Nicole Kidman. But if she really has problems, she could consider a dating service. They are pretty reasonably priced. posted by: MWS on 07.08.04 at 04:18 PM [permalink]Who wouldn't want someone with her looks -- and goes to baseball games! posted by: Robert Tagorda on 07.08.04 at 04:18 PM [permalink]I'll be 30 years and 1 day old on Oct. 30th. You other gents just wait until then.
4)Single men over the age of 30 are gay I am older than she, I am reasonably successful financially (compared to most but not to her), and I love children. Thus, I hereby offer myself in service to Ms. Kidman (pending approval of my wife, of course). posted by: steve on 07.08.04 at 04:18 PM [permalink]She's an Ozzie - maybe Jay should give her a ring?! posted by: Jon on 07.08.04 at 04:18 PM [permalink]Who cares? Her new plastic surgery face is hideous with her ultra-slanted cat eyes. She's so vain she screwed her face up. That definitely looks like a pre-plastic surgery picture by the way. posted by: Patrick on 07.08.04 at 04:18 PM [permalink]...wife caught me so I just say nice `er hair..ouch..dont ask... posted by: Rob..NC on 07.08.04 at 04:18 PM [permalink]8) Single men over 30 are more optimistic about Ted Rall's chances of winning the Nobel Prize in physics than in the ability and willingness of the average Hollywood actress to forge long-lasting relationships. 9) She dated Lenny Kravitz (From Kim du Toit) I'm single and over 30 - I oughta know. posted by: Alan K. Henderson on 07.08.04 at 04:18 PM [permalink]I have to agree with Alan & Kim. You really want Lenny Kravitz' sloppy seconds? Plus I'm suspecting that she may be just a wee bit high maintenance... posted by: Cybrludite on 07.08.04 at 04:18 PM [permalink]while I've never had the problem personally, some men find someone who is with drop dead like this girl's got to be an intimidating factor. So, shy/rejection is a valid point. That aside, though I think Kidman's largest issue isn't the kids or the looks. Her problem is her track record. Consider a hypothetical: We have two women, with equal looks, and personality. We can make them twins, if you like. One's been married and divorced a few times. The other's never been married. If you're after a stable relationship, which of the two will seem the more logical choice? posted by: Bithead on 07.08.04 at 04:18 PM [permalink]Sorry mates, but don't count me in. I just made the leap into not-so-single status with my very own Aussie (who happens to have never dated Lenny Kravitz). posted by: Jay Drezner on 07.08.04 at 04:18 PM [permalink]Kidman is interested in the top .05% of men. Those men have the pick of the litter. I know a man in that category who dated an (admittedly less gorgeous) 40-year-old actress who starred in a blockbuster movie a decade before. He ended up dumping her--he liked college girls better. Nothing's easy for women. posted by: Rachel on 07.08.04 at 04:18 PM [permalink]Might it be that Nicole is just a tad too picky? My guess is yes. Romantic life hint: define your dating pool as being men who are at least as smart as you are, not just those who are as famous as you are. This will increase your chances of encountering a suitable mate by a factor of roughly 10 million, pretty much ensuring a date next Saturday. And remember that your fame is based in no small part on a combination of good looks and good luck, things not likely to stick around long anyway. posted by: frankly0 on 07.08.04 at 04:18 PM [permalink]I don't see anything in that article that suggests Kidman is only interested in men her own age. Let some of us 20-something whippersnappers take a crack at her. We're much easier to break. Worked for Demi Moore. posted by: Roland on 07.08.04 at 04:18 PM [permalink]Okay let's look at it this way. 1) There are going to be a lot of guys who don't ask her out because she's out of their league. I couldn't get a date with Miss Kidman. I couldn't get close enough to knock on her front door. 2) The guys who are in her league can get a better deal. Yes she's pretty, but so are lots of younger women without kids. 3) While it may seem glamorous to date a movie star, everybody "knows" they're fickle and career oriented. While sleeping with one might be a fantasy, an actual relationship would be oriented on them, them, them. Plus movie stars are notoriously insecure. And insecure people are difficult in relationships. We talking "high maintenance" here. Why not date someone less famous and who will be more interested in meeting your needs? So while it may seem strange, I believe Miss Kidman entirely when she says she doesn't have a lot of serious interest in her as a gf. posted by: Oldman on 07.08.04 at 04:18 PM [permalink]I'm almost 40, never married, and I'd date her and the kids no problem. So... 10) can't get her phone number! posted by: Ursus on 07.08.04 at 04:18 PM [permalink]
Who cares? Her new plastic surgery face is hideous with her ultra-slanted cat eyes. She's so vain she screwed her face up. That definitely looks like a pre-plastic surgery picture by the way. Don't forget the Botox! She now looks like a weird robotic version of her formerly-hot self. posted by: R Helms on 07.08.04 at 04:18 PM [permalink]I can't believe that no one has yet advanced the theory that in this interview Kidman is simply lying through her capped teeth. posted by: Gerard Van der Leun on 07.08.04 at 04:18 PM [permalink]"Worked for Demi Moore." I bet Bruce Willis has a few stories... posted by: Alan K. Henderson on 07.08.04 at 04:18 PM [permalink]Cruise, Kravitz, Botox, cat eyes, paparazzi, headcase... I'd still hit it. (My that was vulgar!) posted by: Brian on 07.08.04 at 04:18 PM [permalink]ojhmdwtad upzjiuiatp. posted by: Robert on 07.08.04 at 04:18 PM [permalink]Post a Comment: |
Politics, economics, globalization, academia, pop culture... all from a
Main home page Reviews of DanielDrezner.com: "Sharp but informal commentary on politics and foreign policy." -- The New Republic "Dan Drezner is terrific.... Excellent blog." -- Andrew Sullivan "Dan's stuff is always worth reading." -- Eugene Volokh "One of the essential weblogs." -- Gawker.com "Old battle horse of the blogosphere." -- Jewcy.com "Soft porn." -- Amitai Etzioni "Spawned grave atrocities and vast destruction." -- Glenn Greenwald "Monday morning quarterback... conservative robot... the very foundation of troubles in this country." -- not-so-random readers Contact me at: ddrezner@gmail.com (But click here to read my e-mail policy) Search the Site TNR's Open University Jacob Levy Glenn Reynolds Andrew Sullivan Mickey Kaus Virginia Postrel The Volokh Conspiracy Josh Marshall Crooked Timber OxBlog Real Clear Politics Kevin Drum Across the Aisle Economist's Free Exchange TNR's The Plank NRO's The Corner TAP's Tapped America Abroad Duck of Minerva Opinio Juris Brad DeLong Jeff Jarvis Mystery Pollster Mark Kleiman Meryl Yourish Megan McArdle Marginal Revolution Michael Munger Chris Lawrence Matthew Yglesias Hit and Run Cold Spring Shops Stephen Green Outside the Beltway Pejman Yousefzadeh Laura McKenna (11D) Elected Swineherd Phil Carter Joe Gandelman Winds of Change Andrew Samwick Greg Mankiw Dani Rodrik Roger L. Simon Tom Maguire Greg Djerejian The American Scene Post Global Democracy Arsenal Recent articles online "Foreign Policy Goes Glam."The National Interest, November/December 2007 "Rise of the Hipster Statesmen." Newsweek International, November 1, 2007 "The New New World Order." Foreign Affairs, March/April 2007 "Mind the Gap." The National Interest, January/February 2007 "The Grandest Strategy Of Them All." Washington Post, December 17, 2006 U.S. Trade Strategy: Free Versus Fair Council on Foreign Relations Press, September 2006. Complete online article archive Blog Archives June 2008May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 Academia Area studies Book club culture economics fence-sitting from Blogger globalization homeland security international relations law Mediasphere My very important posts New Republic outsourcing personal politics Sports The blog paper the blogosphere thesis ideas Trade and Development U.S. foreign policy website maintenance See full archives listing Recent Entries • Someone keep Fleet Street away from Bill Clinton• It rivals Buckley vs. Vidal, I tell you • So.... are the Clintons morons? • The New York Times didn't ask me, but then again, that's why I have this blog • Monica Crowley's jet black pot • Al Qaeda is losing • Speaking of karma.... • The blog post that writes itself • What made me laugh today • Where should Hillary go? Site Credits |