 |
|
Tuesday, October 12, 2004
previous entry | main | next entry | TrackBack (3)
Why my productivity will be down this month
This month I have to complete one book manuscript and fully outline the next one -- but now I'm going to lose at least four, but probably seven evenings to the American League Championship Series between the Red Sox and the Yankees. David Pinto has a very amusing post outlining the recent narrative arc of the rivalry. Over at ESPN.com, Sean McAdam lays out why, compared to last year's ALCS, the Red Sox are better and the Yankees are worse. I agree with everything he's written (though I think McAdam ignores the improvement in the Yankee offense with Sheffield and A-Rod representing a major upgrade over Giambi and Soriano in their lineup) -- if the better team wins, then the Red Sox should cruise into the World Series in five games. Of course, being a Red Sox fan, I can easily find the vulnerabilities in the Red Sox -- Schilling's ankle, Pedro's psyche, Manny's goofiness, and of course the SI jinx. Besides, as Mike Bauman observes, since the start of divisional play in 1969, the same teams have played each other in the ALCS in consecutive years seven times -- with the same team winning in both years of consecutive appearances every time. So, as I prepare for the stomach-churning, three final thoughts: 1) This may sound like the head of the U.S. Patent Office back in the 1890's who allegedly said that there was nothing left to be invented, but I find it hard to conceive of how this series can top what's happened in the past two years. Readers are invited to suggest the dramatic possibilities. 2) Is it possible that the Sox-Yankees rivalry has become so intense that neither of them will be winning a World Series anytime soon? The problem is that their playoff series are so physically and emotionally draining that they have nothing left for the World Series. The Yankees may have won last year's ALCS, but Yankee manager Joe Torre burned through his entire pitching staff to win Game Seven, and they lost in six to the Marlins. If this series goes to seven games, it's tough for me to picture either of them knocking off the Cardinals in the World Series [What about the Astros?--ed. With apologies to Josh Chafetz, I don't see that happening). 3) One final semi-serious thought -- the League Championship Series could reduce the political implications of tomorrow night's debate. The Sox-Yankees will attract a national audience, and the Cardinals will grab the attention of one semi-swing state. It will be interesting to see the ratings numbers for tomorrow evening. posted by Dan on 10.12.04 at 01:28 AMComments: Thanks for the link! I also do a more serious look at the series in the next post. posted by: David Pinto on 10.12.04 at 01:28 AM [permalink]As someone who is actually going to be at game 1 tonight and game 2 tomorrow (Yes, I am a native New Yorker, but GO SOX anyway) I bless the day my husband bought be a TiVo so I can TiVo the debate and watch it whan I get home. posted by: Kate on 10.12.04 at 01:28 AM [permalink]Hey, Dan, no updates on the new daughter.... ? How's she (and her mom) doing? Well, I trust.So, you're doing all this traveling, spending time with yourwork life and your home life.... and hte blogging gets ignored. Clearly, your priorities are wanting. (grin) I'm a political junkie, live in California, and don't care for either the Sox or Yankees, but I know what I'll be watching, and it won't be the debate. posted by: Joel B on 10.12.04 at 01:28 AM [permalink]But the political implications of a Sox/Astros World Series would be so much fun. posted by: Brian Ulrich on 10.12.04 at 01:28 AM [permalink]1. Sox sweep, Steinbrenner throttles Brian Cashman on live TV, and fans in Boston riot closing the city for a week. 2. I think either the Sox or the Yankees are always contenders in seven game series. Hell, anyone can win a seven game series. I still think it will be the Sox/Cards with the Sox in 7. 3. Here is the brilliance of Vernon Jordan. First debate is a win for Kerry on national defense since if he wins it, Bush is wounded. High viewership and in a format that favored Kerry. Second debate scheduled for a Friday, against Friday Night Football in a number of Red States, during a weekend so many people aren't home, and in a format that lends itself to awkward questions. Buh does better but fewer people see it. Third debate against Red Sox/Yankees. No one but the bases watch, and even then on split screen. All Kerry needed to do is win the first debate and he's golden since the other two are lower viewers and less interesting to the populace. Like I said, Vernon Jordan is a genius. posted by: Scott on 10.12.04 at 01:28 AM [permalink]Maybe there will be a Don Zimmer moment! posted by: muckdog on 10.12.04 at 01:28 AM [permalink]The Braves are done, again, so I am too, though I may watch a couple of innings when I have time. I don't think anyone beats the Cards this year. posted by: Zathras on 10.12.04 at 01:28 AM [permalink]Having suffered with the Astros since the beginning - Yowza! posted by: TexasToast on 10.12.04 at 01:28 AM [permalink]Zathras, I see you are a fellow Braves fan. Yes, I don't know if I feel up to watching any more baseball after another dispiriting loss. At least the Red Sox and Yankees aren't owned by Time Warner--if they were, Mike Lamb would be playing third base and Ted Lilly pitching for the Yankees. My prediction: since I want to see Sox/Cards, it will probably be Yanks/Astros. posted by: MWS on 10.12.04 at 01:28 AM [permalink]Unfrozen Caveman Centerfielder! Kick ass! Sox in 6. Then an Astros-Red Sox WS. Just to see Clemens pitch game 7 in Fenway. C'mon. You know God wants it. posted by: Jim Dandy on 10.12.04 at 01:28 AM [permalink]WWJDD What would Johnny Damon Do? (Hit .330 with 10 RBI I hope). posted by: trox on 10.12.04 at 01:28 AM [permalink]It's good to see such a collection of Braves fans here -- almost as many as show up at the Ted! Like Zathras, I think I'm done for the year...How 'bout those Falcons? posted by: Appalled Moderate on 10.12.04 at 01:28 AM [permalink]Go Red Sox - from a Braves fan whose productivity got a boost last night. Alas! posted by: pgl on 10.12.04 at 01:28 AM [permalink]Check out www.sonsofsamhorn.com if you need a Red Sox fix. It is a message board for Sox fans around the globe where Curt Schilling, John W Henry, Theo Epstein and others post. That being said, the Sox are in trouble. Schilling hurt. We are %^&*#$! posted by: Jinhocho on 10.12.04 at 01:28 AM [permalink]Wow. Can this be the Home for Orphaned Braves Fans? Every night we sink into bed with visions of halfway decent pitching dancing in our heads. The 'Stros weren't bad. I don't think they can cut it against the Cardinals, but that may be wishful thinking. I'll be sorta-kinda rooting for the Cards, if only because I have a vague, possibly inexplicable fondness for Tony La Russa. As for the ALCS -- please, Lord, let no other Yankees (or Red Sox, for that matter) lose family members. posted by: Jessica on 10.12.04 at 01:28 AM [permalink]At least my Giants got their choking out of the way a little earlier this year. Ugh. posted by: fling93 on 10.12.04 at 01:28 AM [permalink]Who weree idiots who scheduled these debates in the middle of the ALCS?! I'm sorry, I'm a political junkie, but I'm a Sox fan first and foremost. I'll tune into the bebate during commercials and pitcher changes. I already know who I'm voting for anyway, and I can't stand hearing the other guy mangle the English language. posted by: ctd72 on 10.12.04 at 01:28 AM [permalink]The 'Stros weren't bad. I don't think they can cut it against the Cardinals, but that may be wishful thinking. I'll be sorta-kinda rooting for the Cards, if only because I have a vague, possibly inexplicable fondness for Tony La Russa. posted by: scooter on 10.12.04 at 01:28 AM [permalink]Post a Comment: |
 Politics, economics, globalization, academia, pop culture... all from a
Main home page  Reviews of DanielDrezner.com: "Sharp but informal commentary on politics and foreign policy." -- The New Republic "Dan Drezner is terrific.... Excellent blog." -- Andrew Sullivan "Dan's stuff is always worth reading." -- Eugene Volokh "One of the essential weblogs." -- Gawker.com "Old battle horse of the blogosphere." -- Jewcy.com "Soft porn." -- Amitai Etzioni "Spawned grave atrocities and vast destruction." -- Glenn Greenwald "Monday morning quarterback... conservative robot... the very foundation of troubles in this country." -- not-so-random readers Contact me at: ddrezner@gmail.com (But click here to read my e-mail policy) Search the Site TNR's Open University Jacob Levy Glenn Reynolds Andrew Sullivan Mickey Kaus Virginia Postrel The Volokh Conspiracy Josh Marshall Crooked Timber OxBlog Real Clear Politics Kevin Drum Across the Aisle Economist's Free Exchange TNR's The Plank NRO's The Corner TAP's Tapped America Abroad Duck of Minerva Opinio Juris Brad DeLong Jeff Jarvis Mystery Pollster Mark Kleiman Meryl Yourish Megan McArdle Marginal Revolution Michael Munger Chris Lawrence Matthew Yglesias Hit and Run Cold Spring Shops Stephen Green Outside the Beltway Pejman Yousefzadeh Laura McKenna (11D) Elected Swineherd Phil Carter Joe Gandelman Winds of Change Andrew Samwick Greg Mankiw Dani Rodrik Roger L. Simon Tom Maguire Greg Djerejian The American Scene Post Global Democracy Arsenal Recent articles online "Foreign Policy Goes Glam."The National Interest, November/December 2007 "Rise of the Hipster Statesmen." Newsweek International, November 1, 2007 "The New New World Order." Foreign Affairs, March/April 2007 "Mind the Gap." The National Interest, January/February 2007 "The Grandest Strategy Of Them All." Washington Post, December 17, 2006 U.S. Trade Strategy: Free Versus Fair Council on Foreign Relations Press, September 2006. Complete online article archive Blog Archives June 2008May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 Academia Area studies Book club culture economics fence-sitting from Blogger globalization homeland security international relations law Mediasphere My very important posts New Republic outsourcing personal politics Sports The blog paper the blogosphere thesis ideas Trade and Development U.S. foreign policy website maintenance See full archives listing Recent Entries • Someone keep Fleet Street away from Bill Clinton• It rivals Buckley vs. Vidal, I tell you • So.... are the Clintons morons? • The New York Times didn't ask me, but then again, that's why I have this blog • Monica Crowley's jet black pot • Al Qaeda is losing • Speaking of karma.... • The blog post that writes itself • What made me laugh today • Where should Hillary go? Site Credits 
|
