![]() |
|
Wednesday, April 13, 2005
previous entry | main | next entry | TrackBack (2)
Competition has been good for Boeing
The US-EU trade war over government subsidies to Boeing and Airbus -- well, mostly Airbus -- blows hot and cold, it's worth stepping back and seeing how the rise of Airbus has affected Boeing. Fortunately, the Chicago Tribune has been doing periodic stories on this very question in its "Battle for the Skies" feature. The latest installment by Michael Oneal makes two interesting points. One is the extent to which this competition is driven by the extent to which both companies cater and listen to their customers' needs:
The second interesting fact is that Airbus' success has prompted Boeing to do more than have Washington threaten a trade war. They've respnded to the competition by improving their productivity and their customer relations:
posted by Dan on 04.13.05 at 10:09 AM Comments: Good article, although I'd question your "well, mainly Airbus" claim above: as a civil aviation firm, it doesn't benefit from the massive porcine cross-subsidies granted on US military aviation projects... posted by: john b on 04.13.05 at 10:09 AM [permalink]Technology developed for defense work is not nearly as transferable to the civilian sector today as it was 50 years ago. So those porcine cross subsidies are mostly a thing of the distant past, (but not for lack of trying, as the recent tanker lease fiasco shows). What infuriates me (besdides the porcine Airbus subsidies) is current Boeing management. They've spent more than $8 billion on stock buy-backs over the last few years, which means that they didn't think that any new product or process innovations would yield a better return on investment. If an aerospace company would rather pump up its stock price so that managers hit their bonuses than invest in technology it is doomed. posted by: Jos Bleau on 04.13.05 at 10:09 AM [permalink]To be GM or not to be GM, that's Boeing's question. posted by: Richard Heddleson on 04.13.05 at 10:09 AM [permalink]As a parochial American free-trader, I'm all for European taxpayers subsidizing my air travel through lavish launch subsidies. Cheap, high-quality aircraft will raise US productivity and increase our standard of living. Go French state capitalism! As a student of business strategy, though, I'd like to point out that the "aggressive" sales strategy pursued by Leahy (and which Boeing is being forced to emulate) is partly funded by those subsidies. Offering to redesign an aircraft for a particular customer without regard to cost is not somehting firms do when they have to balance marginal revenue and marginal cost. Letting the sales force unilaterally impose operating costs on the manufacturing people bespeaks a less-than-optimizing perspective on competitive positioning. So Boeing's old "non-responsive" policy may have partly been sloth, but also partly economic rationality. In a global economic sense, the Airbus subsidies probably skew resource allocation inefficiently. We end up with more aircraft and more aircraft design and production capacity, and less of whatever the crowded-out and more-valuable outputs would be, than in an ideal world. So the WTO rules on this stuff are not a bad idea if you care about Pareto-optimal resource allocation. From a parochial American point of view, though, the cross-subsidy transfer to the US probably swamps any losses due to inefficiency. posted by: steve on 04.13.05 at 10:09 AM [permalink]It may be the high cost of oil that's really ended up changing the game for Boeing, suddenly efficiency becomes much more important to airlines. Boeing has been impressive of late as how they've developed a product which is something that the market is really going to seek. If oil was $20/bbl though, I doubt the 7(E/8)7 would be generating as much interest. posted by: Joel B. on 04.13.05 at 10:09 AM [permalink]I have some friends that spent their entire careers at Boeing. They are not optimistic about the company's future. They mainly object to the technology transfer to Japanese suppliers. If Boeing gives up their wing-building secrets, then they become just an integrator. posted by: Mark on 04.13.05 at 10:09 AM [permalink]Competition has been good for Boeing's customers if its driven Boeing to improve its customer relations. Competition has not been good for Boeing itself -- they are getting stomped. Of course, the other issue is the extent to which Boeing has changed from a manufacturer of airplanes to a "systems integrator" -- 70% of the production of the 787 is taking place overseas. posted by: Walker on 04.13.05 at 10:09 AM [permalink]Offering to redesign an aircraft for a particular customer without regard to cost is not somehting firms do when they have to balance marginal revenue and marginal cost. Letting the sales force unilaterally impose operating costs on the manufacturing people bespeaks a less-than-optimizing perspective on competitive positioning. So Boeing's old "non-responsive" policy may have partly been sloth, but also partly economic rationality. Yeah, I had to laugh at that spin, also. Salespeople, who often work on commission, *always* promise stuff that companies can't deliver, and then the engineers have to scramble to live up to these promises, cursing the sales department the whole time. This is not generally considered a good thing; it's a sales department out of control. posted by: David Nieporent on 04.13.05 at 10:09 AM [permalink]Post a Comment: |
Politics, economics, globalization, academia, pop culture... all from a
Main home page Reviews of DanielDrezner.com: "Sharp but informal commentary on politics and foreign policy." -- The New Republic "Dan Drezner is terrific.... Excellent blog." -- Andrew Sullivan "Dan's stuff is always worth reading." -- Eugene Volokh "One of the essential weblogs." -- Gawker.com "Old battle horse of the blogosphere." -- Jewcy.com "Soft porn." -- Amitai Etzioni "Spawned grave atrocities and vast destruction." -- Glenn Greenwald "Monday morning quarterback... conservative robot... the very foundation of troubles in this country." -- not-so-random readers Contact me at: ddrezner@gmail.com (But click here to read my e-mail policy) Search the Site TNR's Open University Jacob Levy Glenn Reynolds Andrew Sullivan Mickey Kaus Virginia Postrel The Volokh Conspiracy Josh Marshall Crooked Timber OxBlog Real Clear Politics Kevin Drum Across the Aisle Economist's Free Exchange TNR's The Plank NRO's The Corner TAP's Tapped America Abroad Duck of Minerva Opinio Juris Brad DeLong Jeff Jarvis Mystery Pollster Mark Kleiman Meryl Yourish Megan McArdle Marginal Revolution Michael Munger Chris Lawrence Matthew Yglesias Hit and Run Cold Spring Shops Stephen Green Outside the Beltway Pejman Yousefzadeh Laura McKenna (11D) Elected Swineherd Phil Carter Joe Gandelman Winds of Change Andrew Samwick Greg Mankiw Dani Rodrik Roger L. Simon Tom Maguire Greg Djerejian The American Scene Post Global Democracy Arsenal Recent articles online "Foreign Policy Goes Glam."The National Interest, November/December 2007 "Rise of the Hipster Statesmen." Newsweek International, November 1, 2007 "The New New World Order." Foreign Affairs, March/April 2007 "Mind the Gap." The National Interest, January/February 2007 "The Grandest Strategy Of Them All." Washington Post, December 17, 2006 U.S. Trade Strategy: Free Versus Fair Council on Foreign Relations Press, September 2006. Complete online article archive Blog Archives June 2008May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 Academia Area studies Book club culture economics fence-sitting from Blogger globalization homeland security international relations law Mediasphere My very important posts New Republic outsourcing personal politics Sports The blog paper the blogosphere thesis ideas Trade and Development U.S. foreign policy website maintenance See full archives listing Recent Entries • Someone keep Fleet Street away from Bill Clinton• It rivals Buckley vs. Vidal, I tell you • So.... are the Clintons morons? • The New York Times didn't ask me, but then again, that's why I have this blog • Monica Crowley's jet black pot • Al Qaeda is losing • Speaking of karma.... • The blog post that writes itself • What made me laugh today • Where should Hillary go? Site Credits |