![]() |
|
Wednesday, May 25, 2005
previous entry | main | next entry | TrackBack (0)
Why I've never trusted my parents' milkman...
Below is a photo of me, my brother and the other groomsmen at my brother's wedding:
Can you guess which one is my brother? There is a hidden clue, but on similarity of appearances I would wager there's no chance in hell anyone will get it right. This fact, by the way, amuses my brother and I no end. I promise to post an answer in 24 hours. UPDATE: Answer below the fold Congrats to those who either figured out that my brother has the white rose in his tuxedo -- or Googled to find an answer. Oddly enough, we looked much more alike when we were children. posted by Dan on 05.25.05 at 11:10 PMComments: Your brother is on the end wearing the red rose? Tall dude! Tall mailman? posted by: tom-e-lee on 05.25.05 at 11:10 PM [permalink]Or the white rose is for the groom? I do love a mystery. posted by: tom-e-lee on 05.25.05 at 11:10 PM [permalink]The follicle-challenged dude on your right (the end, next to you). I hope he is not reading this. If I get it right, do I get a prize? posted by: Minh-Duc on 05.25.05 at 11:10 PM [permalink]The white rose. posted by: Alan K. Henderson on 05.25.05 at 11:10 PM [permalink]Tallest one, far right. posted by: Jeremy on 05.25.05 at 11:10 PM [permalink]It's definitely the guy to Dan's left (or from our point of view to the right of Dan). The groom would be wearing a different color flower from the groomsmen. posted by: Ricky Barnhart on 05.25.05 at 11:10 PM [permalink]Yeah, the guy with the white rose. It's the shape of his head- it looks like a wider version of Dan's. posted by: rosignol on 05.25.05 at 11:10 PM [permalink]The guy to the right of Dan because in a photo taken of an occasion like this, you'd put the brothers in the middle. posted by: bg on 05.25.05 at 11:10 PM [permalink]the tall guy to the right of the photo posted by: lewsar on 05.25.05 at 11:10 PM [permalink]THE MAN WITH THE WHITE ROSE IS YOUR BROTHER. posted by: PAM on 05.25.05 at 11:10 PM [permalink]Everyone's got to stop causing suspicion around Dan's parents Esther and David. There were three groomsmen and a groom in order from L to R: Gregg, Dan, Jay (groom) and Kirke Not bad, eh, Dan? posted by: Jason on 05.25.05 at 11:10 PM [permalink]I've always wondered myself about this. You and Jay look nothing alike. But the real question is - who is the milkman's son??? posted by: Pam (the bride) on 05.25.05 at 11:10 PM [permalink]Do you guys take requests? Sing "Wait Until The Sun Shines, Nellie"! posted by: norbizness on 05.25.05 at 11:10 PM [permalink]Well, I thought it was the other guy with the red rose, but after glancing at others' comments, I realize my analytical skills aren't so sharp before 11am. The dude with the white rose is your bro. Hm, who are you first ? ! And: "this fact amuses my brother and ME. Strange - I do not know how to spell 5+ letter words, but I go nuts over the spelling of 4- letter ones. Nitpicker: yeah, some over-educated people have an aversion to ever using the word "me." posted by: cc on 05.25.05 at 11:10 PM [permalink]It was Mr. Green with the Candlestick in the Conservatory! posted by: bob on 05.25.05 at 11:10 PM [permalink]It's really not that odd for siblings to look quite different. You could tell the other three guys in the picture to amscray, put me and my two brothers in there with you, and I doubt anybody who doesn't already know the parties involved would be able to spot the odd duck. (Sorry for the unfortunate phraseology, Dan) Anyway, the little grey cell inform me that the groom and the brother (best man, right?) would go in the center, and the groom would have a different color flower. Mystery solved. http://www.jayandpamswedding.com/ The answers are always out there. posted by: pslade on 05.25.05 at 11:10 PM [permalink]Its the eyes, they are a dead giveaway... posted by: bp32 on 05.25.05 at 11:10 PM [permalink]Post a Comment: |
Politics, economics, globalization, academia, pop culture... all from a
Main home page Reviews of DanielDrezner.com: "Sharp but informal commentary on politics and foreign policy." -- The New Republic "Dan Drezner is terrific.... Excellent blog." -- Andrew Sullivan "Dan's stuff is always worth reading." -- Eugene Volokh "One of the essential weblogs." -- Gawker.com "Old battle horse of the blogosphere." -- Jewcy.com "Soft porn." -- Amitai Etzioni "Spawned grave atrocities and vast destruction." -- Glenn Greenwald "Monday morning quarterback... conservative robot... the very foundation of troubles in this country." -- not-so-random readers Contact me at: ddrezner@gmail.com (But click here to read my e-mail policy) Search the Site TNR's Open University Jacob Levy Glenn Reynolds Andrew Sullivan Mickey Kaus Virginia Postrel The Volokh Conspiracy Josh Marshall Crooked Timber OxBlog Real Clear Politics Kevin Drum Across the Aisle Economist's Free Exchange TNR's The Plank NRO's The Corner TAP's Tapped America Abroad Duck of Minerva Opinio Juris Brad DeLong Jeff Jarvis Mystery Pollster Mark Kleiman Meryl Yourish Megan McArdle Marginal Revolution Michael Munger Chris Lawrence Matthew Yglesias Hit and Run Cold Spring Shops Stephen Green Outside the Beltway Pejman Yousefzadeh Laura McKenna (11D) Elected Swineherd Phil Carter Joe Gandelman Winds of Change Andrew Samwick Greg Mankiw Dani Rodrik Roger L. Simon Tom Maguire Greg Djerejian The American Scene Post Global Democracy Arsenal Recent articles online "Foreign Policy Goes Glam."The National Interest, November/December 2007 "Rise of the Hipster Statesmen." Newsweek International, November 1, 2007 "The New New World Order." Foreign Affairs, March/April 2007 "Mind the Gap." The National Interest, January/February 2007 "The Grandest Strategy Of Them All." Washington Post, December 17, 2006 U.S. Trade Strategy: Free Versus Fair Council on Foreign Relations Press, September 2006. Complete online article archive Blog Archives June 2008May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 Academia Area studies Book club culture economics fence-sitting from Blogger globalization homeland security international relations law Mediasphere My very important posts New Republic outsourcing personal politics Sports The blog paper the blogosphere thesis ideas Trade and Development U.S. foreign policy website maintenance See full archives listing Recent Entries • Someone keep Fleet Street away from Bill Clinton• It rivals Buckley vs. Vidal, I tell you • So.... are the Clintons morons? • The New York Times didn't ask me, but then again, that's why I have this blog • Monica Crowley's jet black pot • Al Qaeda is losing • Speaking of karma.... • The blog post that writes itself • What made me laugh today • Where should Hillary go? Site Credits |