![]() |
|
Saturday, June 18, 2005
previous entry | main | next entry | TrackBack (3)
Which editor at the Washington Post owes Blaine Harden money?
I ask this question because a personal debt is the only possible explanation for why Harden landed a front-page story in today's WaPo about whether Starbucks is bankrupting America's highly educated youth:
Absolutely correct, it's a waste of money.... unless you believe that gourmet coffee generates efficiency improvements in human capital formation.... and student loans usually have lower-than-average interest rates.... and the income boost provided by law school massively outweighs the cost of Starbucks consumption.... and question whether after racking up over $115,000 in debt, it's really the extra thousand or two rom coffee consumption that affects career choices... and you believe Harden's underlying, unproven premise that too many students consume too many lattes. I could go on, or ask caffienne addict Brad DeLong or Starbuck enthusiast Virginia Postrel to go on, but I see that David Adesnik has already addressed this issue -- go check him out. posted by Dan on 06.18.05 at 09:45 PMComments: As an indebt student, survivng through grad school on espresso -- all I'll say in my (our) defense is -- what was Europe like pre-coffee? Enlightenment and coffee introduced similiar times. Coincidence? I think not. posted by: Jor on 06.18.05 at 09:45 PM [permalink]Jor, What they didn't study is whether the act of sitting over at Starbucks with a latte made the students feel so good that they got more out of their study time than they would have elsewhere with a glass of water (or nothing) Maybe it was a slow day over at the Post, after the Downing Street memo posted by: NewsBlaze on 06.18.05 at 09:45 PM [permalink]Of course, Dan. this is comming from a guy who himself has more to say about Katie Holmes than the Downing Street Memo. posted by: Michael Carroll on 06.18.05 at 09:45 PM [permalink]The CDC has a report coming out warning that a latte habit adds to the nation's obesity epidemic. It recommends that latte-drinking indebted students switch to black coffee (Sumatran or French Roast in the morning, Kenya AA after big meals) for better health, reduction of future indebtedness and because, says the report, "...such is the way of manly men." Well that's what I heard. posted by: Zathras on 06.18.05 at 09:45 PM [permalink]Are the editors of the WaPo suicidal? Don't they know better than to try to mess with our caffinne. posted by: NYgirl on 06.18.05 at 09:45 PM [permalink]I brewed my own coffee when I was in college. But since I was spending my old man's money, If only had it been around back then. I know that my own children do (did) the But... Starbuck has horrible coffee in horrible mugs (or worse paper cups!) in a crap athmosphere. No, if you are going to bankrupt yourself drinking coffee don't go to starbucks (is this really the best coffee available in Seattle?) give the bank's money to someone who cares about what they are serving up! posted by: Tadhgin on 06.18.05 at 09:45 PM [permalink]I attended the referenced law school -- yep, Starbucks is across the street. Laptops at SU Law are mandatory and you can even log onto the SU Law webserver while in Starbucks. To spend $3 per day at Starbucks, you would only get a 16 ounce Vente drip. So, how does she arrive at $4,000 over 3 years? That would roughly work out to 1,333 Vente drip orders -- meaning SU Law students while attending classes 5 days per week purchase (estimating 216 days over the academic year) about 6.2 vente drip a day for a estimated total of $18 per day. Obviously Erika didn't have a math, accounting or finance undergraduate major if she believes that the total student cost at Starbucks for an SU student is $3 per day. If the total number of days is increased to 365 days in the calendar year, the daily consumption of Vente drip coffee is 3.76 daily -- the cost is $11.75. How did Erika Lim come up $3 per day? Then again, law professors would sneering refer to a case where an "accounting" was necessary -- performing simple calculations is obviously beneath any "real" attorney. posted by: Debbie on 06.18.05 at 09:45 PM [permalink]Post a Comment: |
Politics, economics, globalization, academia, pop culture... all from a
Main home page Reviews of DanielDrezner.com: "Sharp but informal commentary on politics and foreign policy." -- The New Republic "Dan Drezner is terrific.... Excellent blog." -- Andrew Sullivan "Dan's stuff is always worth reading." -- Eugene Volokh "One of the essential weblogs." -- Gawker.com "Old battle horse of the blogosphere." -- Jewcy.com "Soft porn." -- Amitai Etzioni "Spawned grave atrocities and vast destruction." -- Glenn Greenwald "Monday morning quarterback... conservative robot... the very foundation of troubles in this country." -- not-so-random readers Contact me at: ddrezner@gmail.com (But click here to read my e-mail policy) Search the Site TNR's Open University Jacob Levy Glenn Reynolds Andrew Sullivan Mickey Kaus Virginia Postrel The Volokh Conspiracy Josh Marshall Crooked Timber OxBlog Real Clear Politics Kevin Drum Across the Aisle Economist's Free Exchange TNR's The Plank NRO's The Corner TAP's Tapped America Abroad Duck of Minerva Opinio Juris Brad DeLong Jeff Jarvis Mystery Pollster Mark Kleiman Meryl Yourish Megan McArdle Marginal Revolution Michael Munger Chris Lawrence Matthew Yglesias Hit and Run Cold Spring Shops Stephen Green Outside the Beltway Pejman Yousefzadeh Laura McKenna (11D) Elected Swineherd Phil Carter Joe Gandelman Winds of Change Andrew Samwick Greg Mankiw Dani Rodrik Roger L. Simon Tom Maguire Greg Djerejian The American Scene Post Global Democracy Arsenal Recent articles online "Foreign Policy Goes Glam."The National Interest, November/December 2007 "Rise of the Hipster Statesmen." Newsweek International, November 1, 2007 "The New New World Order." Foreign Affairs, March/April 2007 "Mind the Gap." The National Interest, January/February 2007 "The Grandest Strategy Of Them All." Washington Post, December 17, 2006 U.S. Trade Strategy: Free Versus Fair Council on Foreign Relations Press, September 2006. Complete online article archive Blog Archives June 2008May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 Academia Area studies Book club culture economics fence-sitting from Blogger globalization homeland security international relations law Mediasphere My very important posts New Republic outsourcing personal politics Sports The blog paper the blogosphere thesis ideas Trade and Development U.S. foreign policy website maintenance See full archives listing Recent Entries • Someone keep Fleet Street away from Bill Clinton• It rivals Buckley vs. Vidal, I tell you • So.... are the Clintons morons? • The New York Times didn't ask me, but then again, that's why I have this blog • Monica Crowley's jet black pot • Al Qaeda is losing • Speaking of karma.... • The blog post that writes itself • What made me laugh today • Where should Hillary go? Site Credits |