![]() |
|
Thursday, August 4, 2005
previous entry | main | next entry | TrackBack (0)
Medicine and the modern pitcher
On his 43rd birthday, Houston Astros pitcher Roger Clemens has become his generation's Nolan Ryan, the Official Hero to American Middle-Aged Men everywhere. No Red Sox fan can have an uncomplicated opinion of Clemens -- however, this Alan Schwarz article in ESPN.com provides a nice illustration of how medical advances made Clemens' long career possible:
posted by Dan on 08.04.05 at 04:51 PM Comments: Pfui. Mister claimed Red Sox fan. How about, 'his generation's Luis Tiant'??? posted by: dave s on 08.04.05 at 04:51 PM [permalink]
And for continuing on and on and on, Atlanta's Julio Franco. 46 and still ticking So why is surgery OK but steroids are not? posted by: Whitehall on 08.04.05 at 04:51 PM [permalink]It's unreasonable to require average players to assume the health risks of steroids in order to be competitive. That isn't the case for surgery, which doesn't come with the same risks, and serves as an attempt to repair an injury in order to restore them to their prior ability (bionic implants to boost performance would be a different matter). posted by: fling93 on 08.04.05 at 04:51 PM [permalink]Modern orthopaedic surgery gets more miraculous by the day, for athletes, trauma injuries, seniors etc.This is improved further by modern physical therapy techniques and procedures.
So if you ever wonder about the good parts of American medicine, this is one of them. posted by: save_the_rustbelt on 08.04.05 at 04:51 PM [permalink]To the contrary, I think most Red Sox fans have an utterly uncomplicated view of Clemens: posted by: alkali on 08.04.05 at 04:51 PM [permalink]I was greatly disappointed when Jose Canseco declined to support the use of steriods before the Congressional commitee as he had in his book. This is not to say that I support their use, or Canseco's position in "Juiced". But I think the argument should be made, particularly because I think there is a strange taboo which hovers over enhancements by way of drugs, and not those by way of surgery. In the long run, this taboo ought to be diffused. As an earlier post argues, the harmful consequences of steriods should justify their prohibition. But what if a company created a steriod with less harmful side-effects? Not to mention other advances in drugs which may help attention, memory and a whole other host of mental abilities. If these should enhance play, ought they to be illegal? posted by: Michael Patrick Gibson on 08.04.05 at 04:51 PM [permalink]Post a Comment: |
Politics, economics, globalization, academia, pop culture... all from a
Main home page Reviews of DanielDrezner.com: "Sharp but informal commentary on politics and foreign policy." -- The New Republic "Dan Drezner is terrific.... Excellent blog." -- Andrew Sullivan "Dan's stuff is always worth reading." -- Eugene Volokh "One of the essential weblogs." -- Gawker.com "Old battle horse of the blogosphere." -- Jewcy.com "Soft porn." -- Amitai Etzioni "Spawned grave atrocities and vast destruction." -- Glenn Greenwald "Monday morning quarterback... conservative robot... the very foundation of troubles in this country." -- not-so-random readers Contact me at: ddrezner@gmail.com (But click here to read my e-mail policy) Search the Site TNR's Open University Jacob Levy Glenn Reynolds Andrew Sullivan Mickey Kaus Virginia Postrel The Volokh Conspiracy Josh Marshall Crooked Timber OxBlog Real Clear Politics Kevin Drum Across the Aisle Economist's Free Exchange TNR's The Plank NRO's The Corner TAP's Tapped America Abroad Duck of Minerva Opinio Juris Brad DeLong Jeff Jarvis Mystery Pollster Mark Kleiman Meryl Yourish Megan McArdle Marginal Revolution Michael Munger Chris Lawrence Matthew Yglesias Hit and Run Cold Spring Shops Stephen Green Outside the Beltway Pejman Yousefzadeh Laura McKenna (11D) Elected Swineherd Phil Carter Joe Gandelman Winds of Change Andrew Samwick Greg Mankiw Dani Rodrik Roger L. Simon Tom Maguire Greg Djerejian The American Scene Post Global Democracy Arsenal Recent articles online "Foreign Policy Goes Glam."The National Interest, November/December 2007 "Rise of the Hipster Statesmen." Newsweek International, November 1, 2007 "The New New World Order." Foreign Affairs, March/April 2007 "Mind the Gap." The National Interest, January/February 2007 "The Grandest Strategy Of Them All." Washington Post, December 17, 2006 U.S. Trade Strategy: Free Versus Fair Council on Foreign Relations Press, September 2006. Complete online article archive Blog Archives June 2008May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 Academia Area studies Book club culture economics fence-sitting from Blogger globalization homeland security international relations law Mediasphere My very important posts New Republic outsourcing personal politics Sports The blog paper the blogosphere thesis ideas Trade and Development U.S. foreign policy website maintenance See full archives listing Recent Entries • Someone keep Fleet Street away from Bill Clinton• It rivals Buckley vs. Vidal, I tell you • So.... are the Clintons morons? • The New York Times didn't ask me, but then again, that's why I have this blog • Monica Crowley's jet black pot • Al Qaeda is losing • Speaking of karma.... • The blog post that writes itself • What made me laugh today • Where should Hillary go? Site Credits |