Wednesday, October 19, 2005

previous entry | main | next entry | TrackBack (0)


So explain this to me about Harriet Miers....

The positive trait that appeared most often in early press accounts about Harriet Miers was her meticulous attention to every detail. Say what you will about Miers, all the i's were dotted and all the t's were crossed on her watch.

One could quibble about whether this is the most useful trait in a Supreme Court Justice, but it is certainly a positive trait in its own right -- one that many Americans wish they had in greater stock. And, at this stage of the game, I suspect the Bush administration will take whatever positive memes about Miers it can get.

Which makes this Knight-Ridder story by James Kuhnhenn all the more disturbing:

Senate Republicans and Democrats said Wednesday that Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers' written answers to Senate questions were incomplete and inadequate and demanded that she and the White House provide more details, particularly about her work as White House counsel.

Judiciary Committee Chairman Arlen Specter, R-Pa., and the committee's top Democrat, Patrick Leahy of Vermont, took the unusual step of asking Miers by letter to amplify her responses. Specter described Miers' nomination process as "chaotic."

"We do not have much paperwork. We do not have much of a record," Specter said.

"I don't know of anybody who would tell you in that committee that they were satisfied with the responses," Leahy said....

White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said Miers intended to respond soon.

"From the first day when she was nominated, Ms. Miers told Sen. Specter that she had years of files to go through and that she would work to complete the questionnaire as quickly as possible, but that it was likely she would have to send follow-ups to provide additional information," Perino said.

To be fair to Miers, a lot of the incomplete answers are likely due to Bush's reluctance to do anything that event hints at a waiver of executive privilege.

Still, there's this very odd end of the story:

Specter, whose handling of Roberts' confirmation was praised by both Democrats and Republicans, voiced bewilderment at how Miers' nomination has unfolded, and he alluded to his 100-minute encounter with Miers on Monday, where she ended up disputing his account of their meeting to the press.

Specter initially said Miers had expressed the view that the Constitution contains a right to privacy, a key element in the Roe v. Wade case that established a woman's right to an abortion. Miers, however, said Specter misunderstood her, and Specter said he accepted her statement.

But on Wednesday, he said: "I've never walked out of a room and had a disagreement as to what was said."

UPDATE: Patrick Belton points out that Miers has given an embarrassing answer to an embarrassing question.

In NRO, Byron York notes that her supporters have admitted that, "The meetings with the senators are going terribly. On a scale of one to 100, they are in negative territory."

Orin Kerr thinks the tipping point on Miers has been reached.

posted by Dan on 10.19.05 at 08:54 PM




Comments:

This is not a comment on Harriet Miers, but I don't think Sen. Specter expressed himself as well as he might have. He's been a Senator since 1981 and has sat in thousands of meetings. He must have walked out of some of them with a disagreement as to what was said. Maybe his staff were afraid to tell him.

posted by: Zathras on 10.19.05 at 08:54 PM [permalink]



If she's so detail oriented how'd she forget to pay her dues to the District of Columbia bar? The right to practice law of the chief counsel to the President of the United States was suspended in Waashington. Yes, this is a technicality maybe even a trivial one, but it gives me pause since this is supposed to be Ms. Miers's strength.

posted by: Howard Green on 10.19.05 at 08:54 PM [permalink]



Bush is probably the most incompetent human on the planet. He was incompetent on the first day of his presidency, he still is today, and he will be in the future. He is basically a shaved monkey (though probably not as good with tools as a monkey). As sad as this fact is for our country and the world, the ridiculous part is that republicans and conservatives are just realizing it now.

For God’s sake, will somebody give him a blow job so we can finally have him impeached!

posted by: bill jones on 10.19.05 at 08:54 PM [permalink]



For me the most fascinating aspect of the Miers confirmation will be how the Democrats deal with this.

Do they support her and watch the Republicans tear each other apart thereby appearing opportunistic or do they reject her on principle and risk a more right-wing appointment? I'm personally leaning towards the latter but I wouldn't criticise anyone for going the first route.

posted by: reformist muslim on 10.19.05 at 08:54 PM [permalink]



When someone mentions "attention to detail" as a great virtue--unless it's accompanied by something more definitive, like "powerful insight" or "unquenchable curiosity"--my mind's eye conjures up an image of Reese Witherspoon in "Election", sharpening pencil after pencil with mind-numbing precision.

Attention to detail and "discretion" (another fraught word when applied to high-level apparatchiks) are the booby prizes of the lonely and the untalented. Real people don't have time to be unremitting perfectionists and people who have honest attachments to friends and family cannot dedicate their lives, vestal-virgin style, to a political hack of any stripe.

Lose this nominee. Blame it on Scooter Libby as he sinks helplessly to the bottom of the Potomac, a warning to all who would be discreet at the expense of integrity.

posted by: Kelli on 10.19.05 at 08:54 PM [permalink]



Specter didn't say there were typos in the responses, just that they were inadequate. I think he means from a political point of view. Seeing as how Miers has also be touted as someone who plays with her cards glued to her chest, I can see how opening up now might be a hard habit to break.

posted by: Brock on 10.19.05 at 08:54 PM [permalink]



If Byron York's sources are correct, Meiers has flunked her second test as well: the interviews on the hill are going so badly they're being cut back.
Will she next flunk the big test and during the hearings see not only her ignorance of constitutional issues exposed but also a rather severe deficiency in what the British call cleverness?
How did Bush contrive this doozy?
Another Carswell? But did Nixon know what he was doing, and intend to demean the court?

posted by: Flabbergasted on 10.19.05 at 08:54 PM [permalink]



If the White House council is so sharp and gives such sage legal advice, how in the f#%! did she get the Valerie Plame and Special Prosecutor thing so absolutely wrong? Um, don't you think the wise decision, a decision that could only protect the White House for a variety of potential outcomes down the road, would be to let Libby and Rove go when this stuff happened. Just say they acted alone and are being let go. Why keep them on, stonewall the press about it, have your the press secretary say they did not do anything wrong and then have everything blow up 2 years down the road. Wow, she is really bright! Exactly the type of person you want on the Supreme Court for twenty years.

posted by: Matt on 10.19.05 at 08:54 PM [permalink]



If the White House council is so sharp and gives such sage legal advice, how in the f#%! did she get the Valerie Plame and Special Prosecutor thing so absolutely wrong? Um, don't you think the wise decision, a decision that could only protect the White House for a variety of potential outcomes down the road, would be to let Libby and Rove go when this stuff happened. Just say they acted alone and are being let go. Why keep them on, stonewall the press about it, have your the press secretary say they did not do anything wrong and then have everything blow up 2 years down the road. Wow, she is really bright! Exactly the type of person you want on the Supreme Court for twenty years.

posted by: Matt on 10.19.05 at 08:54 PM [permalink]



One of the strangest things to emerge from the hearings on Brownie Miers just came out of her financial information. this post at Slate via of Tapped by Henry Blodget came out today: http://slate.msn.com/id/2128418/nav/tap1/

Now this is the same Blodget of Internet infamy so I hope he really is telling the truth. that said he points out that Miers' is essentially broke because she is the sole caretaker of her mother and has spent down her IRA and played the mortgage game to do so. If the intersection of issues Social Security, healthcare, retirement and the bankruptcy laws are not fortune smiling on the progressive movement nothing is for this is a situation all to many of us are or will face in the very near future. It should also go to debunk the idea that the Boomers are looking forward to some wad of cash from their parents.

posted by: Robert M on 10.19.05 at 08:54 PM [permalink]



Yes! The tipping point has been reached and for the love please end this and put all of us out of our misery. It seems to be the President is being poorly served during these recent months in office. After the Mike Brown FEMA fiascoe how could he have blundered into this mess...

posted by: Jeremy on 10.19.05 at 08:54 PM [permalink]






Post a Comment:

Name:


Email Address:


URL:




Comments:


Remember your info?





Politics, economics, globalization, academia, pop culture... all from a untenured tenured perspective

Main home page
Main blog page
About Me
Search My Blog
Favorite Blogs
Book Recommendations
Books of the Month (Summer 2008)






Reviews of DanielDrezner.com:

"Sharp but informal commentary on politics and foreign policy." -- The New Republic

"Dan Drezner is terrific.... Excellent blog." -- Andrew Sullivan

"Dan's stuff is always worth reading." -- Eugene Volokh

"One of the essential weblogs." -- Gawker.com

"Old battle horse of the blogosphere." -- Jewcy.com

"Soft porn." -- Amitai Etzioni

"Spawned grave atrocities and vast destruction." -- Glenn Greenwald

"Monday morning quarterback... conservative robot... the very foundation of troubles in this country." -- not-so-random readers


Contact me at:
ddrezner@gmail.com
(But click here to read my e-mail policy)









Search the Site


Try advanced site search









Favorite Blogs

TNR's Open University
Jacob Levy
Glenn Reynolds
Andrew Sullivan
Mickey Kaus
Virginia Postrel
The Volokh Conspiracy
Josh Marshall
Crooked Timber
OxBlog
Real Clear Politics
Kevin Drum
Across the Aisle
Economist's Free Exchange
TNR's The Plank
NRO's The Corner
TAP's Tapped
America Abroad
Duck of Minerva
Opinio Juris
Brad DeLong

Jeff Jarvis
Mystery Pollster
Mark Kleiman
Meryl Yourish
Megan McArdle
Marginal Revolution
Michael Munger
Chris Lawrence
Matthew Yglesias
Hit and Run
Cold Spring Shops
Stephen Green
Outside the Beltway
Pejman Yousefzadeh
Laura McKenna (11D)
Elected Swineherd
Phil Carter
Joe Gandelman
Winds of Change
Andrew Samwick
Greg Mankiw
Dani Rodrik
Roger L. Simon
Tom Maguire
Greg Djerejian
The American Scene
Post Global
Democracy Arsenal




Recent articles online

"Foreign Policy Goes Glam."
The National Interest, November/December 2007

"Rise of the Hipster Statesmen."
Newsweek International, November 1, 2007

"The New New World Order."
Foreign Affairs, March/April 2007

"Mind the Gap."
The National Interest, January/February 2007

"The Grandest Strategy Of Them All."
Washington Post, December 17, 2006

U.S. Trade Strategy: Free Versus Fair
Council on Foreign Relations Press, September 2006.

Complete online article archive




Blog Archives

June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002

Academia
Area studies
Book club
culture
economics
fence-sitting
from Blogger
globalization
homeland security
international relations
law
Mediasphere
My very important posts
New Republic
outsourcing
personal
politics
Sports
The blog paper
the blogosphere
thesis ideas
Trade and Development
U.S. foreign policy
website maintenance

See full archives listing




Recent Entries

Someone keep Fleet Street away from Bill Clinton
It rivals Buckley vs. Vidal, I tell you
So.... are the Clintons morons?
The New York Times didn't ask me, but then again, that's why I have this blog
Monica Crowley's jet black pot
Al Qaeda is losing
Speaking of karma....
The blog post that writes itself
What made me laugh today
Where should Hillary go?




Site Credits