 |
|
Saturday, January 14, 2006
previous entry | main | next entry | TrackBack (0)
And the dumbest thing said by a Senator is.....
The hardworking staff here at danieldrezner.com would like to thank the members of the Senate Judiciary Committee for their performance this past week. They provided a lot of grist for contest-entrants and commentators alike. It's telling that the week ended with numerous pieces on how to improve the confirmation process -- even though Alito proved relatively forthcoming in his answers. Dahlia Lithwick reminds Democratic Senators that members of the Federalist Society are not teeming with hate and rage; T.A. Frank suggested at TNR Online that the way to rescue the dignity of the hearings is to remove television from the equation. My one good government suggestion -- give both the majority and minority counsel for the Judiciary Committee an hour or two to question the nominee. That'll never happen, of course, but it might actually generate some useful back-and-forth. Now, on to the contest -- on Monday, readers were encouraged to submit "the single dumbest thing a Senator says during the hearings." A lot of very worthy entrants were submitted. In the end however, there can be only one. And the Senator who said the dumbest thing is..... Congratulations to Senator Diane Feinstein of California for this exchange with Alito: FEINSTEIN: So if I understand this, you essentially said that you wanted to follow precedent, newly established law in this area. And you left a little hedge that if Congress made findings in that law, then that might be a different situation.Feinstein had some tough competition -- The Kennedy/Specter exchange over mail delivery, Tom Coburn's auto accident metaphor, anything that came out of Chuck Schumer's mouth, and what I can only figure was Joe Biden's attempt to win a bet in which he could use the word "Princeton" in every sentence he used for an hour. And I confess I might be biased in favor of Feinstein because of her runner-up status during the Roberts confirmation. Let me stress that dumber things might have been said this week -- but the folks here at danieldrezner.com could only judge the submissions we received. In the end, Feinstein's ability to deny the existence of a hypothetical in her question about... a hypothetical was what swayed the judges. To be fair, Feinstein was talking about a counterfactual, but I think it's safe to say that counterfactuals were included in Altio's definition of hypotheticals. Congratulations to Millers Time for being the first to submit the winning entry! [What's his prize?--ed. What all bloggers desire -- links and attention! Plus, you gotta check out this other post of his -- it's the funniest blonde joke I've ever seen. posted by Dan on 01.14.06 at 10:44 AMComments: Am I the only one out here who wasn't amused by the "funniest blonde joke"? BO-ring. posted by: Sissy Willis on 01.14.06 at 10:44 AM [permalink]I am honored... Thanks for the links. posted by: Miller's Time on 01.14.06 at 10:44 AM [permalink]God you overlooked Lindsay Grahams stated hope that scalito would beleive the R's when they claimed never to have heard of Abramoff. I like the idea of allowing the counsels to question the nominee. Questioning by counsels is done at investigative hearings; why not at confirmation hearings? Another improvement, I think, would be to have the panels with law professors appear before the nominee, as a means of setting the agenda as seen in the legal professoriate. Yet another idea: Just get rid of the direct questioning of the nominee altogether. It really is a relatively recent innovation, and perhpas not a necessary one. But the best thing we could do to improve the confirmation process is to require a 2/3 vote on the Senate floor to confirm. posted by: Matthew Shugart on 01.14.06 at 10:44 AM [permalink]The Alito hearings reminded me of a job search website commercial. Alito was the man among the monkeys. chsw posted by: chsw on 01.14.06 at 10:44 AM [permalink]I must thank you again... My blog averages 40-50 hits on a good day. I have had almost 600 hits today... WOW! posted by: Miller's Time on 01.14.06 at 10:44 AM [permalink]As a Californian I am honored that you think so lightly on the merits of Sen. Feinstein's intellect, but it would have been a real contestif the other differently-abled California senator was also on the Judiciary Committee. That would have been an interesting race to the bottom of the IQ cgart. posted by: Pat Patterson on 01.14.06 at 10:44 AM [permalink]Senator Feinstein deserves a lot of credit for behaving a thoroughly professional manner, even if her questions could hav been better. She was one of the few, if not the only, Senator to sit through the testimony given by Alito's fellow judges. posted by: ROA on 01.14.06 at 10:44 AM [permalink]Senator Feinstein hs been distracted by the burden of drafting the Bill of Censure for President Clinton. She volunteered for the task to dissuade those seeking Impeachment. The task has consumed her every moment for many years. The burden is clearly weighing her down. (I live in Lantos-Land and never miss the opportunity to vote against her) posted by: andy johnson on 01.14.06 at 10:44 AM [permalink]God you overlooked Lindsay Grahams stated hope that scalito would beleive the R's when they claimed never to have heard of Abramoff. I don't think it's fair to count jokes made on purpose. posted by: Charles Martin on 01.14.06 at 10:44 AM [permalink]Feinstein is a mental giant compared with the other senator from LaLa land, Barbara Boxer. I think the Kennedy/Specter exchange was particularly funny...petulant antics to derail the hearings and get some more primetime air... ...niice Teddie... posted by: Orbit Rain on 01.14.06 at 10:44 AM [permalink] nothing beats the congressman in my town. not to mention the wonderful guys at capital hill and the rules they like to practice on their doctors. posted by: Internal Medicine Doctor on 01.14.06 at 10:44 AM [permalink]Post a Comment: |
 Politics, economics, globalization, academia, pop culture... all from a
Main home page  Reviews of DanielDrezner.com: "Sharp but informal commentary on politics and foreign policy." -- The New Republic "Dan Drezner is terrific.... Excellent blog." -- Andrew Sullivan "Dan's stuff is always worth reading." -- Eugene Volokh "One of the essential weblogs." -- Gawker.com "Old battle horse of the blogosphere." -- Jewcy.com "Soft porn." -- Amitai Etzioni "Spawned grave atrocities and vast destruction." -- Glenn Greenwald "Monday morning quarterback... conservative robot... the very foundation of troubles in this country." -- not-so-random readers Contact me at: ddrezner@gmail.com (But click here to read my e-mail policy) Search the Site TNR's Open University Jacob Levy Glenn Reynolds Andrew Sullivan Mickey Kaus Virginia Postrel The Volokh Conspiracy Josh Marshall Crooked Timber OxBlog Real Clear Politics Kevin Drum Across the Aisle Economist's Free Exchange TNR's The Plank NRO's The Corner TAP's Tapped America Abroad Duck of Minerva Opinio Juris Brad DeLong Jeff Jarvis Mystery Pollster Mark Kleiman Meryl Yourish Megan McArdle Marginal Revolution Michael Munger Chris Lawrence Matthew Yglesias Hit and Run Cold Spring Shops Stephen Green Outside the Beltway Pejman Yousefzadeh Laura McKenna (11D) Elected Swineherd Phil Carter Joe Gandelman Winds of Change Andrew Samwick Greg Mankiw Dani Rodrik Roger L. Simon Tom Maguire Greg Djerejian The American Scene Post Global Democracy Arsenal Recent articles online "Foreign Policy Goes Glam."The National Interest, November/December 2007 "Rise of the Hipster Statesmen." Newsweek International, November 1, 2007 "The New New World Order." Foreign Affairs, March/April 2007 "Mind the Gap." The National Interest, January/February 2007 "The Grandest Strategy Of Them All." Washington Post, December 17, 2006 U.S. Trade Strategy: Free Versus Fair Council on Foreign Relations Press, September 2006. Complete online article archive Blog Archives May 2008April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 Academia Area studies Book club culture economics fence-sitting from Blogger globalization homeland security international relations law Mediasphere My very important posts New Republic outsourcing personal politics Sports The blog paper the blogosphere thesis ideas Trade and Development U.S. foreign policy website maintenance See full archives listing Recent Entries • Hillary Clinton's inexcusable bigotry• So Tuesday was a pretty good day.... • The best commencement address you'll never hear • Some final thoughts on Hillary Clinton • America's awesome influence over the G8 • Hillary Clinton's contribution to the all-purpose excuse genre • What I said at the London conference • Why I'll be (relatively) mute this week • Bitter academics, tenure, torture, and pie • A real policy difference. Yippee!! Site Credits 
|
