![]() |
|
Sunday, February 26, 2006
previous entry | main | next entry | TrackBack (0)
Al Qaeda defines victory down
If this Associated Press report by Donna Abu-Nasr is correct, then Al Qaeda's spokesman is starting to sound a lot like the publicist for the Tampa Bay Devil Rays. Both are all too eager to declare moral victories when real ones aren't happening: Al-Qaida on Saturday vowed more attacks on Saudi oil facilities, a day after an attempt to bomb the world's biggest oil processing complex showed the group still can strike inside the kingdom....I look forward to future Al Qaeda posting claiming that, "it was a good operation today, we just caught a bad break," and "With our farm system, we are confident in our ability to be a powerful terrorist group in 2010." posted by Dan on 02.26.06 at 01:11 AM Comments: Perhaps, in today's Saudi Arabia, being able to plan and partially execute such an action without getting nailed before the fact counts as a victory for al Qaeda. Let's hope they're continually forced to lower the bar on what constitutes a "successful operation." posted by: bartman on 02.26.06 at 01:11 AM [permalink]Don't forget that they're gonna have high placement in the draft to get some more talented prospects... posted by: Matthew on 02.26.06 at 01:11 AM [permalink]I'm not so sure, that that attack on the oil facilities was simply a moral victory. Wasn't one of the stated purpose is of such attacks to raise hell with the world's finances? Look closely and you may discover that the price of crude went up by $2.00 a barrel immediately following that attack. That seems to me a very concrete result toward the end goal. I grant that the price increase was fairly temporary. But one can't help but wonder if there isn't some market manipulation going on here. posted by: Bithead on 02.26.06 at 01:11 AM [permalink]Sure, Bithead - maybe the Saudis staged the whole thing to get a temporary bump in the price, to swell their coffers a little bit more. They probably faked the al Qaeda press release too. posted by: bartman on 02.26.06 at 01:11 AM [permalink]"Don't forget that they're gonna have high placement in the draft to get some more talented prospects..." Ha! I got a good laugh from that. Thanks. Honestly I think Al Qaeda is required to declare victory after every attack. If Osama came out and said "We faught a good game but in the end we just could make the shots (no pun intended)" I would imagine recruiting would take a serious hit. Claiming failure in attacks it not the type of thing which gets people to sign up. Nobody wants to be a the Bode Miller of martyrdom. posted by: Chris Albon on 02.26.06 at 01:11 AM [permalink]No, Bartman... not the Saudis. "The authenticity of the statements could not be independently confirmed." We don't know what happened. We don't know to what extent the attack failed, yet. Depending on how many al Qaeda observers got away, al Qaeda might not know what happened. al Qaeda in saudi arabia needs to be very careful with their symbolism. They might not have to do very well at that to be more popular than the saudi monarchy, a low bar, but they want to be popular enough they get volunteers to do suicide bombing. So they need targets that people agree are good symbolic targets. Schools and hospitals are no good for that. Wasting the nation's oil is probably not particularly good symbolically. But reducing exports, when every saudi knows their dwindling oil is more valuable the longer they leave it in the ground.... This seems to be as good a place for any for the greatest quote of all time, from Tampa Bay Devil Rays ex-GM Chuck LaMar: Bithead: I doubt al Qaeda has some sort of profit sharing deal with any OPEC nation. It's more likely they're operating on (a) bin Laden's residual fortune - he did have many millions, and (b) the money the Taliban looted from the Kabul treasury before they left town - estimated to be in the area of $110 million. posted by: bartman on 02.26.06 at 01:11 AM [permalink]The problem with the farm system is that you simply can't get good coaches! Experience counts, and when we're talking about successful suicide bombers..... Well, let's just say that Mohammed Atta isn't available any more.... posted by: Don S on 02.26.06 at 01:11 AM [permalink]The problem with the farm system is that you simply can't get good coaches! Experience counts, and when we're talking about successful suicide bombers..... Well, let's just say that Mohammed Atta isn't available any more.... posted by: Don S on 02.26.06 at 01:11 AM [permalink]Matthew, re: draft position...nice point. And they're going to need the high draft choices, because I'm pretty sure that due to the vagaries of the free agent market, al qaeda is way above the salary cap of 1800 virgins a year. Quote Osama, "do I look like f---ing steinbrenner?!!! You think I just pluck virgins off my virgin tree and send them up to heaven so all you dead bastards can collect on this sh**?!!!" Later on, feeling more collected, Osama pointed out that everyone deals with the cap system, and, in the end, it helps to achieve parity. "there's a a lot of small market teams that don't have our financial resources and market share." He went on to point out that smaller market teams, like Hamas, and Hezbollah had been consistently good year after year despite lesser resources. Bin Laden ended his news conference early before he was able to address the upcoming collective bargaining agreement talks, although recent statements indicate owners have reached tentative agreements with zealots, militants, and true believers, but that radicals were holding out for an extra four virgins upon ascension.
Bart; I doubt they do as well. Then again, there's always the open market to invest in... at just the time when they know there's going to be a large price increase.... one they create. All of which can be undertaken by third parties... all without any connection at all between AQ and the house of Saud. Follow? posted by: Bithead on 02.26.06 at 01:11 AM [permalink]Post a Comment: |
Politics, economics, globalization, academia, pop culture... all from a
Main home page Reviews of DanielDrezner.com: "Sharp but informal commentary on politics and foreign policy." -- The New Republic "Dan Drezner is terrific.... Excellent blog." -- Andrew Sullivan "Dan's stuff is always worth reading." -- Eugene Volokh "One of the essential weblogs." -- Gawker.com "Old battle horse of the blogosphere." -- Jewcy.com "Soft porn." -- Amitai Etzioni "Spawned grave atrocities and vast destruction." -- Glenn Greenwald "Monday morning quarterback... conservative robot... the very foundation of troubles in this country." -- not-so-random readers Contact me at: ddrezner@gmail.com (But click here to read my e-mail policy) Search the Site TNR's Open University Jacob Levy Glenn Reynolds Andrew Sullivan Mickey Kaus Virginia Postrel The Volokh Conspiracy Josh Marshall Crooked Timber OxBlog Real Clear Politics Kevin Drum Across the Aisle Economist's Free Exchange TNR's The Plank NRO's The Corner TAP's Tapped America Abroad Duck of Minerva Opinio Juris Brad DeLong Jeff Jarvis Mystery Pollster Mark Kleiman Meryl Yourish Megan McArdle Marginal Revolution Michael Munger Chris Lawrence Matthew Yglesias Hit and Run Cold Spring Shops Stephen Green Outside the Beltway Pejman Yousefzadeh Laura McKenna (11D) Elected Swineherd Phil Carter Joe Gandelman Winds of Change Andrew Samwick Greg Mankiw Dani Rodrik Roger L. Simon Tom Maguire Greg Djerejian The American Scene Post Global Democracy Arsenal Recent articles online "Foreign Policy Goes Glam."The National Interest, November/December 2007 "Rise of the Hipster Statesmen." Newsweek International, November 1, 2007 "The New New World Order." Foreign Affairs, March/April 2007 "Mind the Gap." The National Interest, January/February 2007 "The Grandest Strategy Of Them All." Washington Post, December 17, 2006 U.S. Trade Strategy: Free Versus Fair Council on Foreign Relations Press, September 2006. Complete online article archive Blog Archives June 2008May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 Academia Area studies Book club culture economics fence-sitting from Blogger globalization homeland security international relations law Mediasphere My very important posts New Republic outsourcing personal politics Sports The blog paper the blogosphere thesis ideas Trade and Development U.S. foreign policy website maintenance See full archives listing Recent Entries • Someone keep Fleet Street away from Bill Clinton• It rivals Buckley vs. Vidal, I tell you • So.... are the Clintons morons? • The New York Times didn't ask me, but then again, that's why I have this blog • Monica Crowley's jet black pot • Al Qaeda is losing • Speaking of karma.... • The blog post that writes itself • What made me laugh today • Where should Hillary go? Site Credits |