Monday, April 3, 2006

previous entry | main | next entry | TrackBack (0)


So how's it going in Lebanon?

Christine Spolar takes a look in the Chicago Tribune at what's happened in Lebanon since Syrian troops left the country. Spolar takes a pesimistic view of politicians dithering while the people suffer -- but after reading the article, I didn't see a lot of heft to that claim.

The interesting part of the story was about how Hezbollah is coping with normal politics:

The pressure is on the Lebanese political class to recapture the promise of a lost spring. Leaders from all parties in parliament are in round-table talks, the first national dialogue in decades, in hopes of translating last year's street protests for "freedom, sovereignty, independence" into some kind of progress.

After bitter delays, they are debating whether President Emile Lahoud, a former commander of the Lebanese armed forces allied with Syria, should be forced from office. They are also questioning for the first time whether the militant group Hezbollah needs its decades-old armed wing.

The discussions are difficult but necessary, according to those involved in the talks and observers keen to see results.

"We never even sat with some of these people before," said Galeb Abou Zeinab, a Hezbollah strategist. "Just sitting and talking is positive . . . and opens people up to a natural give-and-take."....

The United States and France are sponsors of a UN Security Council resolution that calls for the disarming of Lebanese militia, including Hezbollah. But Hezbollah says it needs to maintain its fighters to guard against possible Israeli incursions.

When others argue that weapons are unnecessary since Israeli troops withdrew from southern Lebanon in 2000, Hezbollah leaders point to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as evidence of Israeli ambition, and they see no reason that Israel would not return to the south if Hezbollah forces disappeared.

Such words appeal to many Arabs in Lebanon, who view Israel as an enemy, and the estimated 350,000 Palestinians who live in refugee camps in Lebanon.

Like other Islamist parties in the Middle East, Hezbollah made inroads in recent elections, claiming 14 seats in the 128-member parliament. Party members are heading ministries for the first time.

But Hezbollah's strength in these internal talks also is due to its history. It has been one of the few political forces in Lebanon to connect with people over the issue of land and sovereignty. When Israeli troops left, Hezbollah leaders were quick to claim credit.

"Everyone will be looking to maneuver," political scientist Makdisi said about the historic dialogue. "Hezbollah may know that at some point they will give up the arms--but the question is: How do you use them as a bargaining chip?"

I'm not holding my breath waiting for Hezbollah to disarm -- but then again, I never thought I would have ever heard a Hezbollah strategist praising the "natural give-and-take" of politics.

posted by Dan on 04.03.06 at 09:11 AM




Comments:

Dan,
just so you know, there is noone in lebanon that is actually calling on Hizbullah to disarm. The nature of that aspect of those talks are on how to legitimize their military wing. the trouble is that those who are against syria and want Hizbullah "give up their arms" are asking that the Hizbullah military wing become a regular part of the army under the traditional military leadership, while Hizbullah officials want to be considered a completely independent wing of the lebanese military. No one in Lebanon is seriously calling for them to give up their weapons, and no one will do so until Israel gives back the Golan Hights and gives some justice to the Palestinian refugees in Lebanon.

Anyway, not that you are interested in internal Lebanese political issues, but Hizbullah is really a nationalist and stabilizing force in Lebanon. All other parties were involved in killing each other during the civil war, while Hizbullah fought a legitimate resistance. Also, because of the nature of its social services and the resistance, the article is right when it said, "It has been one of the few political forces in Lebanon to connect with people..." anyway, moral of the story is that Hizbullah represents a large portion of the Lebanese population, and only got 14 in the parliament because they are restricted to that many based on a power sharing argeement. in reality they probably represent 40-50% of the population.

lastly and directly related, dan, i wonder whether you would be willing to blog about the latest article by the Palestinian Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh. You are extremely willing to criticize the Arabs and Palestinians and everything and blame them for everything, but i wonder whether you have even considered their opinions. so, yeah, i wonder about your opinions on his latest article, you can find it here:
http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article4608.shtml

posted by: joe m. on 04.03.06 at 09:11 AM [permalink]



Joe M. has no clue what he is talking about, and clearly doesn't live in the same Lebanon you are talking about, Dan.

The majority of the Lebanese want Hezbollah to disarm. Perhaps Joe should diversify his news coverage beyond Al Manar (the Hezbollah news network), and check out some real, independent coverage from http://www.YaLibnan.com.

posted by: Ahmad Farhat on 04.03.06 at 09:11 AM [permalink]



Pairs of comments like this give me the impression that lebanon doesn't have an established mainstream media. When a country has an MSM like we do, everybody knows what the MSM says, and if you say something that sounds radically different people will say you're crazy or a conspiracy theorist or something.

But here we have two different people with wildly different views of lebanon, and chances are they're both right. Without a MSM to tell people what the consensus of opinion is, there is no consensus of opinion. There are people who think the discussion is about how to disarm Hizbollah, and there are people who say there's no possibility of disarming Hizbollah and the discussion is about how to rebrand it. Both are true among different groups, and they have to figure out what consensus they can get later, when they try to make a deal. And afterward they can disagree about what the deal means.

No MSM to set them straight and tell them what it really means.

posted by: J Thomas on 04.03.06 at 09:11 AM [permalink]



My guess is that most other groups would like to disarm Hezbollah, but the Shiite groups would not.

posted by: erg on 04.03.06 at 09:11 AM [permalink]



Lebanon needs more independent news outlets. We have enough "mainstream media" outlets, the problem is they are practically all politician owned and controlled.

Most recently Michel Aoun is trying to get a TV station for his political party, citing the need since his competitors all have TV stations.

The emergence of smaller, independent news outlets like Ya Libnan has been the one sign of progression. For one, their perspectives are not aligned to any particular political group.

erg is right... most groups would like to disarm Hezbollah, but many shiites side with them. I, for one, am a shiite that wants them disarmed and dismantled. They have hijacked my religion to benefit their political agenda.

posted by: Ahmad Farhat on 04.03.06 at 09:11 AM [permalink]



My impression is the Daily Star is pretty independent. However, I am not really well-informed on Lebanon, so maybe I'm wrong about that.

http://www.dailystar.com.lb/home2.asp

posted by: Les Brunswick on 04.03.06 at 09:11 AM [permalink]



A former high ranking staffer of the Daily Star informed the blogger of www.beirutbeltway.com about how he was threatened by Syrian intelligence to publish articles written by a sympathetic/biased reporter.

Several Daily Star staff memebers are known to be in cahoots with some of the worst politicans, and it shows in the paper... it's weak and not very credible on the street in Lebanon.

posted by: Tony Joe on 04.03.06 at 09:11 AM [permalink]






Post a Comment:

Name:


Email Address:


URL:




Comments:


Remember your info?





Politics, economics, globalization, academia, pop culture... all from a untenured tenured perspective

Main home page
Main blog page
About Me
Search My Blog
Favorite Blogs
Book Recommendations
Books of the Month (Summer 2008)






Reviews of DanielDrezner.com:

"Sharp but informal commentary on politics and foreign policy." -- The New Republic

"Dan Drezner is terrific.... Excellent blog." -- Andrew Sullivan

"Dan's stuff is always worth reading." -- Eugene Volokh

"One of the essential weblogs." -- Gawker.com

"Old battle horse of the blogosphere." -- Jewcy.com

"Soft porn." -- Amitai Etzioni

"Spawned grave atrocities and vast destruction." -- Glenn Greenwald

"Monday morning quarterback... conservative robot... the very foundation of troubles in this country." -- not-so-random readers


Contact me at:
ddrezner@gmail.com
(But click here to read my e-mail policy)









Search the Site


Try advanced site search









Favorite Blogs

TNR's Open University
Jacob Levy
Glenn Reynolds
Andrew Sullivan
Mickey Kaus
Virginia Postrel
The Volokh Conspiracy
Josh Marshall
Crooked Timber
OxBlog
Real Clear Politics
Kevin Drum
Across the Aisle
Economist's Free Exchange
TNR's The Plank
NRO's The Corner
TAP's Tapped
America Abroad
Duck of Minerva
Opinio Juris
Brad DeLong

Jeff Jarvis
Mystery Pollster
Mark Kleiman
Meryl Yourish
Megan McArdle
Marginal Revolution
Michael Munger
Chris Lawrence
Matthew Yglesias
Hit and Run
Cold Spring Shops
Stephen Green
Outside the Beltway
Pejman Yousefzadeh
Laura McKenna (11D)
Elected Swineherd
Phil Carter
Joe Gandelman
Winds of Change
Andrew Samwick
Greg Mankiw
Dani Rodrik
Roger L. Simon
Tom Maguire
Greg Djerejian
The American Scene
Post Global
Democracy Arsenal




Recent articles online

"Foreign Policy Goes Glam."
The National Interest, November/December 2007

"Rise of the Hipster Statesmen."
Newsweek International, November 1, 2007

"The New New World Order."
Foreign Affairs, March/April 2007

"Mind the Gap."
The National Interest, January/February 2007

"The Grandest Strategy Of Them All."
Washington Post, December 17, 2006

U.S. Trade Strategy: Free Versus Fair
Council on Foreign Relations Press, September 2006.

Complete online article archive




Blog Archives

June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002

Academia
Area studies
Book club
culture
economics
fence-sitting
from Blogger
globalization
homeland security
international relations
law
Mediasphere
My very important posts
New Republic
outsourcing
personal
politics
Sports
The blog paper
the blogosphere
thesis ideas
Trade and Development
U.S. foreign policy
website maintenance

See full archives listing




Recent Entries

Someone keep Fleet Street away from Bill Clinton
It rivals Buckley vs. Vidal, I tell you
So.... are the Clintons morons?
The New York Times didn't ask me, but then again, that's why I have this blog
Monica Crowley's jet black pot
Al Qaeda is losing
Speaking of karma....
The blog post that writes itself
What made me laugh today
Where should Hillary go?




Site Credits