![]() |
|
Monday, July 31, 2006
previous entry | main | next entry | TrackBack (0)
How isolated is Iran right now?
I find it amazing that despite the turmoil in the Middle East -- and the blame that many place on the United States for what's happening -- the Security Council still voted 14-1 to threaten Iran with economic sanctions unless that country suspended its nuclear enrichment and reprocessing activities. posted by Dan on 07.31.06 at 11:22 PMComments: In the first place, and hard as it may be to believe if you watch CNN, not everyone cares about the Middle East. Why should they? Secondly even governments that dislike American policy there and elsewhere have reason to be concerned about the direction Iran appears to be taking in its foreign policy generally. But most important by far is that no one outside Iran really thinks an Iranian nuclear weapons program can lead to anything good, and no one believes Iranian assurances that Tehran is only seeking nuclear energy for civilian uses. The Security Council vote does not mean that Council members are prepared to take real substantive steps to prevent Iran from moving its nuclear program forward. It is, though, a timely reminder that not every action by foreign governments represents a referendum on the United States or its foreign policy. posted by: Zathras on 07.31.06 at 11:22 PM [permalink]Maybe, you should listen to Iran's statement at the Security Council before you go condemning them. And Zathras, you might want to notice that Qatar's explicit and stated reason for voting against the resolution was that it was against the "eruption of another volcano in the region." So, though I know you are vague when you say "even governments that dislike American policy there and elsewhere have reason to be concerned", it might interest you that the country that is in the region did not want any more trouble. Other countries voted for the resolution, not because they agreed with it, but because the USA is really powerful and it is more problematic for a country to go against the USA then to go against a weak country like Iran. you can see the video of Iran's response here if go to this site: (it is the 7th one down, don't be fooled, there is another security Not sure why you'd be amazed by this. Resolution was watered down and main players have staked out relative positions - so backtracking at this point would serve what purpose? I imagine what you're trying to intimate is that anti-American invective over mideast by some is merely rhetorical, tactical and not 'sincere'. No doubt this is true - but also par for course and to be expected. posted by: godismyautodealer on 07.31.06 at 11:22 PM [permalink]They give a deadline of August 31 but I'm worried about August 22. This is meaningless chatter. posted by: John Davies on 07.31.06 at 11:22 PM [permalink]Five seconds and a Google Image search will tell you why, Zathras... Tiny little Qatar, located right at one of the Persian Gulf choke points, guaranteed to get Doha and the ports on which its livelihood depends pounded flat any time Iran decides to do so... posted by: Happycrow on 07.31.06 at 11:22 PM [permalink]A conspiracy theory view (which I don't believe in, but I'm just tossing it out there) is that Iran is encouraging unrest to keep oil prices high to build up cash reserves in anticipation of possible future sanctions. So a little Hezbollah/Israel war is sort of the same as investing in a hedge fund for Iran. posted by: RWB on 07.31.06 at 11:22 PM [permalink]Perhaps the US and Europe don't want the situation in Lebanon to give Iran the impression that the Western powers can be easily distracted. But I would second what Zathras says. The 14-1 vote is a non-binding resolution and not a real threat to impose sanctions. posted by: David Billington on 07.31.06 at 11:22 PM [permalink] RWB - Iran imports 40% of its gasoline. Iran subsidizes its gasoline @ $0.35/gal. Iran is moving to a peacetime rationing system because it had $0 allocated to import gasoline in 2H 2006. This means that September 2006 there will be shortages and a great amount of discontent. Where's the money? It's a combination of down the drain, in mullah's pockets, and in the pockets of the CCP and Putin's crew in St. Petersberg. Both could use the cash and no doubt they whored themselves dear. Iran is courting internal revolution if it imposes that rationing system when its peacetime. Iran needs a war. Iran will have its war. posted by: TM Lutas on 07.31.06 at 11:22 PM [permalink]Wow, the security council has agreed to a deadline to consider threatening sanctions. That ought to work about as well as UN resolution 1559 which called on Lebanon to disarm Lebanese and foreign guerillas, and to expand Lebanese authority to all its territories. posted by: c on 07.31.06 at 11:22 PM [permalink]So What? Iran is laughing behind closed doors. Stop making enriched uranium or what...?! You'll take away our birthday? Sanctions don't mean a thing, thanks to Russia and Syria etc at the back door. I agree with Newt and all this talk about sanctions etc. is meaningless. Wake up people! posted by: Ron on 07.31.06 at 11:22 PM [permalink]I will just add one more thing. And this is in respect to Zathras' first comment on this thread: "In the first place, and hard as it may be to believe if you watch CNN, not everyone cares about the Middle East. Why should they?" Actually, I agree with you on this. I don't think the average American should care, just as they don't care about any African or Asian war. Americans have pretty well proven not to care about anything, especially the suffering of poor people or the oppression of the weak. But, the amount of press coverage on this war is specifically because it is Israel. Israel has a (to say the least) privileged position in American diplomatic and media society. Israel is an unimportant country on a emotional piece of land. It, generally, has almost no relevance to the USA. Lately it has a lot more relevance because the USA has because an arm of Israeli foreign policy, but overall, for the people of the USA, there is no reason to give a damn. I will just say though, the Jewish people have done an amazing job of placing themselves within the halls of power. I have to hand it to them, maybe they are smarter then the rest of us. My guess is that if Israel bombed a gathering of Nobel Peace Prize winners tomorrow, the American congress would declare 410-8 that Israel was defending itself from terrorism, while CNN and the rest of the media might be so bold as to report that the famlies of the dead said it was a "disproportionate" use of force. posted by: Joe M. on 07.31.06 at 11:22 PM [permalink]See this recent piece on Iran: posted by: a on 07.31.06 at 11:22 PM [permalink]" will just say though, the Jewish people have done an amazing job of placing themselves within the halls of power. I have to hand it to them, maybe they are smarter then the rest of us. " Res ipso loquitur posted by: liberalhawk on 07.31.06 at 11:22 PM [permalink]Post a Comment: |
Politics, economics, globalization, academia, pop culture... all from a
Main home page Reviews of DanielDrezner.com: "Sharp but informal commentary on politics and foreign policy." -- The New Republic "Dan Drezner is terrific.... Excellent blog." -- Andrew Sullivan "Dan's stuff is always worth reading." -- Eugene Volokh "One of the essential weblogs." -- Gawker.com "Old battle horse of the blogosphere." -- Jewcy.com "Soft porn." -- Amitai Etzioni "Spawned grave atrocities and vast destruction." -- Glenn Greenwald "Monday morning quarterback... conservative robot... the very foundation of troubles in this country." -- not-so-random readers Contact me at: ddrezner@gmail.com (But click here to read my e-mail policy) Search the Site TNR's Open University Jacob Levy Glenn Reynolds Andrew Sullivan Mickey Kaus Virginia Postrel The Volokh Conspiracy Josh Marshall Crooked Timber OxBlog Real Clear Politics Kevin Drum Across the Aisle Economist's Free Exchange TNR's The Plank NRO's The Corner TAP's Tapped America Abroad Duck of Minerva Opinio Juris Brad DeLong Jeff Jarvis Mystery Pollster Mark Kleiman Meryl Yourish Megan McArdle Marginal Revolution Michael Munger Chris Lawrence Matthew Yglesias Hit and Run Cold Spring Shops Stephen Green Outside the Beltway Pejman Yousefzadeh Laura McKenna (11D) Elected Swineherd Phil Carter Joe Gandelman Winds of Change Andrew Samwick Greg Mankiw Dani Rodrik Roger L. Simon Tom Maguire Greg Djerejian The American Scene Post Global Democracy Arsenal Recent articles online "Foreign Policy Goes Glam."The National Interest, November/December 2007 "Rise of the Hipster Statesmen." Newsweek International, November 1, 2007 "The New New World Order." Foreign Affairs, March/April 2007 "Mind the Gap." The National Interest, January/February 2007 "The Grandest Strategy Of Them All." Washington Post, December 17, 2006 U.S. Trade Strategy: Free Versus Fair Council on Foreign Relations Press, September 2006. Complete online article archive Blog Archives June 2008May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 Academia Area studies Book club culture economics fence-sitting from Blogger globalization homeland security international relations law Mediasphere My very important posts New Republic outsourcing personal politics Sports The blog paper the blogosphere thesis ideas Trade and Development U.S. foreign policy website maintenance See full archives listing Recent Entries • Someone keep Fleet Street away from Bill Clinton• It rivals Buckley vs. Vidal, I tell you • So.... are the Clintons morons? • The New York Times didn't ask me, but then again, that's why I have this blog • Monica Crowley's jet black pot • Al Qaeda is losing • Speaking of karma.... • The blog post that writes itself • What made me laugh today • Where should Hillary go? Site Credits |