Tuesday, August 22, 2006

previous entry | main | next entry | TrackBack (0)


That Lopez Obrador has an interesting political strategy

Andrés Manuel López Obrador’s strategy to reverse the results in Mexico's presidential election is starting to confuse me. Consider this Financial Times story by Adam Thomson:

Ever since Mr López Obrador, leftwing candidate in the election for president on July 2, lost by a razor-thin 244,000 votes to Felipe Calderón of the ruling centre-right National Action party, he has been “fighting to save democracy”....

In a rare interview, Mr López Obrador told the Financial Times at the weekend that not only would his struggle continue but that it would also become more radical and incorporate new acts of “civil resistance” to press his case.

All this has come as little surprise to his critics, who brand the silver-haired 52-year-old simply as an unreformed leftist campaigner with an authoritarian streak and scant regard for legal process.

They would probably be unsurprised, too, to learn what Mr López Obrador is reading: Sources on the History of the Mexican Revolution, a large leather-bound book with gold leaf on the spine. “You have to know history to know what to do in circumstances . . .”, he says before tailing off into silence.

Mr López Obrador has been reading about José Vasconcelos, a prominent revolutionary figure who later put down his loss in the 1929 presidential election to fraud and called on supporters to begin an armed struggle. And like that of Vasconcelos, Mr López Obrador is aware that the story of his own struggle might be retold for future generations.

Never in this country’s history has an opposition movement managed to bring together so many people,” he says. “This is a historic moment because the next few days will define the future of democracy in Mexico, the role of the institutions and respect for the constitution.”....

As a political strategy, however, most analysts believe the call for peaceful civil resistance is a big mistake. The resulting traffic chaos from the blockade of Reforma has annoyed many residents in the capital, which is by far Mr López Obrador’s biggest support base. An increasingly radical strategy may also alienate members of his own party, which did well at the legislative level. Before long, they argue, instead of becoming a new Vasconcelos, he may find himself a lonely – and insignificant – character.

Mr López Obrador admits that “there has been a drain of support” since he began his civil resistance campaign. He also accepts that less than half the population supports him in his struggle. In the capital, for example, he believes he now has the backing of 38 per cent of citizens.

But he insists that he had no option but to challenge the authorities. “You can’t stop them unless you take these kinds of steps. The way to fight fraud and to overcome the news blackout is what we are doing now,” he says. “If we hadn’t taken Reforma [the occupied avenue], we would not exist.” (emphases added)

If this Bloomberg report by Patrick Harrington and Adriana Arai is accurate, the sit-in in Mexico City cost his party votes in Chiapas.

If Lopez Obrador knows that his "permanent protest" campaign is causing him to lose support, and there is no indication that the protests to date are affecting the legal part of the electoral process, how is this Mexican standoff going to end?


posted by Dan on 08.22.06 at 07:52 AM




Comments:

Lopez Obrador would sure like to be selected President in 2006. But he likely knows that will not now happen.

He's creating the legend of the stolen election (always useful for a populist complaining about the rotten social order). That way, he can keep the status of "shadow president" until 2012 and keep his forces motivated through 2012. And getting the presidency in 2012 probably means more to this guy than how well his party does in other elections in 2006.

Six years is a long time to forget about traffic jams in Mexico City. Does anyone remember Al Gore's efforts to count just his votes in Florida who isn't otherwise in the tank for Bush?

And since this guy probably has a number of leftist intellectuals and writers in his pocket, those six years can be used to develop plausible conspiracy theories and tales of infamous corruption, backed up by articles in the popular press and the occasional best seller.

It's never too early to run for 2012, if you're young enough.

posted by: Appalled Moderate on 08.22.06 at 07:52 AM [permalink]



I hope I'm wrong, but I don't think AMLO has much respect for the democratic process. I have commented here before than "El Peje" is a threat to democracy in Mexico. His fiery speaches are directed at the most uneducated and poorest Mexicans, who believe every word. In spite of all evidence to the contrary, they genuinely believe that the election was stolen. Whether AMLO himself believes it is irrelevent: It's a means to gain power.

Most Mexicans feel great relief that he lost, given that he has only since the election shown his true colors. According to polls, that includes many of the people who voted for him. But there are roughly 10 million Mexicans who are angry about the allegedly stolen election, many of whom have no problems camping out on Paseo de la Reforma because they have no jobs and the mayor is giving them free food and shelter.

How will this end? AMLO clearly wants to provoke a confrontation with the army. This would enhance his martyr image and (he thinks) enhance his support among the middle class. Pres Fox has meticulously avoided sending troups near the protesters, but the army is in the airport. My prediction is that AMLO will try to "occupy" the airport during the Independence Day celebration in 3 weeks. In my opinion, it's unlikely that solders will fire on protesters. The solders are also from the poorest segment of society. But they are also unlikely to side with the protesters, since the army is by far the best job available to them. Most likely AMLO will succeed in closing down the airport for a time, but lose most of his remaining support in the process.

posted by: OpenBorderMan on 08.22.06 at 07:52 AM [permalink]



It does appear AMLO is reliving his past. From Tropical Messiah By Enrique Krauze, New Republic 19/6/06:

To a large extent, López Obrador built the PRD in Tabasco from the ground up: sleeping in poor communities, traveling through towns and villages, editing a combative newspaper. His first great success was the midterm elections of 1991. The PRI claimed complete victory, as always, but López Obrador protested the fraud and led an "exodus for democracy" to Mexico City. Five thousand peasants set out for the capital and camped in the Zócalo. The government of Carlos Salinas de Gortari succumbed to the pressure. López Obrador returned to Tabasco with a good harvest: three municipalities recognized for the PRD and the governor's imminent resignation...

...Two years later, following in the steps of Garrido and Madrazo, he ran for the governorship of Tabasco....He visited every municipality and met hundreds of thousands of citizens. "The people were fired up," he remembers. The elections were disputed, and, by a margin of barely 20,000 votes, victory was declared for Madrazo. López Obrador's sympathizers refused to accept the results. They occupied the Villahermosa town square, called for civil disobedience, and installed a parallel government.

...Faced with the imminent danger of repression, López Obrador dissolved the waiting masses in the town square of Villahermosa. Shortly afterward, he once again fled to Mexico City, where he displayed boxes of documents that contained proof of the electoral fraud in Tabasco.

What does this say about the future? Not sure. But a dramatic climb down, for the purpose of protecting his people, and a promise to always be around when there is injustice, seems like the likely approach after some more chest thumping. I can't imagine the guy believes he can take power -- he seems very versed on the history of his country and how it works, whatever his regard for the rule of law. The central government in Mexico has been remarkably stable since the 20s, and the military is not known for its interest in golpe del estado.

posted by: Appalled Moderate on 08.22.06 at 07:52 AM [permalink]




I'm not sure that Lopez Obrador is aware (or wants to be aware for that matter) of the fact that more than 67% of those who voted for him regret having done so. If elections were held today, he would most probably loose even against Madrazo (PRI’s candidate). His position is simply: "Democracy = President Lopez Obrador". Anything and everything else is FASCISM. He took the lead over his opponents before the July elections by insisting on his most absolute disapproval of other political parties' practices concerning abusing power, violating and making "tailored maid" laws, among other things. Today, the only reason for his being able to do what he is doing, is precisely his abuse of power. Mexico City is governed by Alejandro Encinas; a "Perredista" appointed by Lopez who allows and gives him every thinkable political support to do as he sees fit, regardless of the law. Any other group or citizens, wouldn't even had been allowed to take the city or would have been removed and turned to the authorities very, very long ago. However, Mexico City is the ONLY city, and Distrito Federal is the ONLY state where he can get away with this, as he has practically no followers anywhere else and makes more and more enemies as time goes by.

posted by: Cecilia Torres on 08.22.06 at 07:52 AM [permalink]




I'm not sure that Lopez Obrador is aware (or wants to be aware for that matter) of the fact that more than 67% of those who voted for him regret having done so. If elections were held today, he would most probably loose even against Madrazo (PRI’s candidate). His position is simply: "Democracy = President Lopez Obrador". Anything and everything else is FASCISM. He took the lead over his opponents before the July elections by insisting on his most absolute disapproval of other political parties' practices concerning abusing power, violating and making "tailored maid" laws, among other things. Today, the only reason for his being able to do what he is doing, is precisely his abuse of power. Mexico City is governed by Alejandro Encinas; a "Perredista" appointed by Lopez who allows and gives him every thinkable political support to do as he sees fit, regardless of the law. Any other group or citizens, wouldn't even had been allowed to take the city or would have been removed and turned to the authorities very, very long ago. However, Mexico City is the ONLY city, and Distrito Federal is the ONLY state where he can get away with this, as he has practically no followers anywhere else and makes more and more enemies as time goes by.

posted by: Cecilia Torres on 08.22.06 at 07:52 AM [permalink]



Paciencia. It'll blow over, and Mexico will be a better country for it.

posted by: St. James the Lesser on 08.22.06 at 07:52 AM [permalink]






Post a Comment:

Name:


Email Address:


URL:




Comments:


Remember your info?





Politics, economics, globalization, academia, pop culture... all from a untenured tenured perspective

Main home page
Main blog page
About Me
Search My Blog
Favorite Blogs
Book Recommendations
Books of the Month (Summer 2008)






Reviews of DanielDrezner.com:

"Sharp but informal commentary on politics and foreign policy." -- The New Republic

"Dan Drezner is terrific.... Excellent blog." -- Andrew Sullivan

"Dan's stuff is always worth reading." -- Eugene Volokh

"One of the essential weblogs." -- Gawker.com

"Old battle horse of the blogosphere." -- Jewcy.com

"Soft porn." -- Amitai Etzioni

"Spawned grave atrocities and vast destruction." -- Glenn Greenwald

"Monday morning quarterback... conservative robot... the very foundation of troubles in this country." -- not-so-random readers


Contact me at:
ddrezner@gmail.com
(But click here to read my e-mail policy)









Search the Site


Try advanced site search









Favorite Blogs

TNR's Open University
Jacob Levy
Glenn Reynolds
Andrew Sullivan
Mickey Kaus
Virginia Postrel
The Volokh Conspiracy
Josh Marshall
Crooked Timber
OxBlog
Real Clear Politics
Kevin Drum
Across the Aisle
Economist's Free Exchange
TNR's The Plank
NRO's The Corner
TAP's Tapped
America Abroad
Duck of Minerva
Opinio Juris
Brad DeLong

Jeff Jarvis
Mystery Pollster
Mark Kleiman
Meryl Yourish
Megan McArdle
Marginal Revolution
Michael Munger
Chris Lawrence
Matthew Yglesias
Hit and Run
Cold Spring Shops
Stephen Green
Outside the Beltway
Pejman Yousefzadeh
Laura McKenna (11D)
Elected Swineherd
Phil Carter
Joe Gandelman
Winds of Change
Andrew Samwick
Greg Mankiw
Dani Rodrik
Roger L. Simon
Tom Maguire
Greg Djerejian
The American Scene
Post Global
Democracy Arsenal




Recent articles online

"Foreign Policy Goes Glam."
The National Interest, November/December 2007

"Rise of the Hipster Statesmen."
Newsweek International, November 1, 2007

"The New New World Order."
Foreign Affairs, March/April 2007

"Mind the Gap."
The National Interest, January/February 2007

"The Grandest Strategy Of Them All."
Washington Post, December 17, 2006

U.S. Trade Strategy: Free Versus Fair
Council on Foreign Relations Press, September 2006.

Complete online article archive




Blog Archives

June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002

Academia
Area studies
Book club
culture
economics
fence-sitting
from Blogger
globalization
homeland security
international relations
law
Mediasphere
My very important posts
New Republic
outsourcing
personal
politics
Sports
The blog paper
the blogosphere
thesis ideas
Trade and Development
U.S. foreign policy
website maintenance

See full archives listing




Recent Entries

Someone keep Fleet Street away from Bill Clinton
It rivals Buckley vs. Vidal, I tell you
So.... are the Clintons morons?
The New York Times didn't ask me, but then again, that's why I have this blog
Monica Crowley's jet black pot
Al Qaeda is losing
Speaking of karma....
The blog post that writes itself
What made me laugh today
Where should Hillary go?




Site Credits