![]() |
|
Thursday, September 28, 2006
previous entry | main | next entry | TrackBack (0)
Why are there no anti-Borat riots in Kazakhstan?
The New York Times' Steven Lee Myers looks at a question that I've wondered about from time to time -- what do the people of Kazakhstan think about Borat? The answer appears to be surprisingly liberal: There is no Running of the Jews here. No one greets you with the expression “Jagshemash,” which is either nonsense, garbled Polish or mangled Czech; it’s hard to say. The country’s national drink is not made from horse urine, though fermented horse milk, or kumys, is considered a delicacy. (It tastes like effervescent yogurt.)It is interesting that this Muslim country can take Borat with a grain of salt, whereas other jibes at Middle Eastern values provoke a more... frenzied response. [Borat does not poke fun at Islam, whereas Mohammed cartoons do. You're comparing apples and oranges!!--ed. Maybe... except that nationalism can provoke just as much passion as religion, so I think the similarities are more important than the differences.] Oh, and you can see the trailer for Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan by clicking here. As for Borat's reaction to the Kazakh government's denunciations, click here. posted by Dan on 09.28.06 at 02:45 PMComments: It seems to me that viewers understand Borat to be tongue-in-cheek and even endearing. If anything, the Cohen satire is great publicity for Kazakhstan, which is not exactly well-known in much of the developed world. posted by: Anon on 09.28.06 at 02:45 PM [permalink]it may help that borat's version of kazakhstan bears no resemblance to the real thing. the joke in every borat skit i've seen is not on kazakhstan, it's on the americans he interviews who display a profound bigotry and ignorance about the world. the lack of reaction may also be because most kazakhs have never heard of borat. finally, kazakhstan is not a majority muslim country (it is 47% muslim). not that i think that is why there aren't any borat riots. but i thought i should still point it out posted by: upyernoz on 09.28.06 at 02:45 PM [permalink]I doubt Borat engenders any interest in Kazakhstan, any more than Polish jokes made people interested in Poland. Borat is like a modern version of Ubu Roi, the demented play by Alfred Jarry about the king of "Poland". Kazakhstan is like Poland in Jarry's play--it represents no place... Kazakhstan should resonate with us in the West because of it's oil. It's an important country and worth learning about. Borat is hilarious, but he's more about AMerica than Kazakhstan...
Dan, I lived in Kazakhstan for three years and loved it. It ain't the Middle East. Sure it is corrupt as hell, but the people are lovely and the scenery around Almaty ss stunning - my office was a 20 minute drive from the wonderful ski slopes. Plus, the women are the most beautiful in the world (even my wife agrees and she is from Kyrgyzstan) and they dress accordingly. You are far, far more likely to see a MaxMara miniskirt in Almaty or Astana than you are to see a woman in a veil. In much of Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan, historically Islam had a pretty light touch arriving only in the 18th century. In the villages animist traditions remain strong. The Saudis pumped a lot of money into mosque building in the 90s and made some inroads among disaffected youth, but by and large the population is pretty secular. Russian and Soviet traditions are probably as strong as any Muslim traditions.
"except that nationalism can provoke just as much passion as religion" I don't think that applies to Arab and Central Asian countries. In these countries folks are more passionate about religion than about the rather new and artificial nations. Turkey and Iran might be the only Muslim country with a strong nationalism. posted by: Atlantiker on 09.28.06 at 02:45 PM [permalink]I lived in Kyrgyzstan for 2 years, and SteveinVT gets it exactly right. The Kyrgyz and Kazakh (basically mountain and steppe elements of the same group) tend not to be at all passionate about Islam. While the Arabs made it to the area in the 8th c., they didn't last long and didn't leave much behind. Also, add Bishkek to the list of wonderful places for miniskirt-watching... posted by: Jake on 09.28.06 at 02:45 PM [permalink]
I used the Borat trailer during a blogging workshop in Almaty I was at a couple weeks ago and everyone seemed to find it funny. The other most common opinion, I was told by some folks who have lived there for a while, is to not understand what is supposed to be funny about it. posted by: Nathan Hamm on 09.28.06 at 02:45 PM [permalink]"Borat is hilarious, but he's more about AMerica than Kazakhstan" It is more about America - and British snobbery. Borat is one of Sacha Cohen's characters that exist to incite "plain American" reactions that are fit, or are edited to fit, in the tv format which appeal to British senses of snobbery and superiority. Borat in himself is funny because Cohen plays it hammily to the live US subjects in turn playing to British expectations. Part of the humor is implicit British misuderstanding of American cultural cues, such as politeness. Another cultural factor not explained is the presence of the camera and how Americans react in social situations with that presence - they play along. For example, his oft shown scene in a honky tonk prompting the locals to respond to an anti-semitic Kazakh song. If the filming was hidden there would be another reaction - first a bottle in the mouth for bad singing. Still Borat is funny in his own right. Not funny is Cohen's American rapper persona Ali G. If he didn't try to pull off the imitation as a serious immitation in America it might work. The failed cultural cues are evident to most Americans. If you are British, how do you react to an American trying to imitate a Scottish accent? Borat has a degree of self-deprecation, Ali G. is smug superiority. That's why he bombed on MTV and elsewhere. The American appeal is to narrow elites uncomfortable with the majority of Americans. The type of people who don't like country but who feel obliged to dictate or opine that Americans should listen to the Dixie Chicks. Last night after Jake Tapper's love piece for Borat it was interesting to see Craig Ferguson's show. He is Scottish and has a recurring bit where he imitates a Western American Cowboy car salesman type. He doesn't play it serious, plays it camp and the audience loves him - their is not an iota of anti-American or class hostility to him. Saying that, Sacha is a smart guy and may be laughing to himself how he has suckered the British public by appealing to their biases and priggishness. The Kazakhs are convenient foil because none they are far away, there is little fear of retribution. ... Let's see Sacha play the role as an Arab... posted by: Karl on 09.28.06 at 02:45 PM [permalink]Sure it's funny to use Borat to make fun of Americans, but does Cohen even realize that his character is nothing like a Kazakh - it's just a rehash of every Eastern European stereotype? Some people don't realize Kazakhstan is in Asia. posted by: b. phillips on 09.28.06 at 02:45 PM [permalink]Sure it's funny to use Borat to make fun of Americans, but does Cohen even realize that his character is nothing like a Kazakh - it's just a rehash of every Eastern European stereotype? I always thought that was part of the joke, though - most Americans/Britons just hear the "-stan" at the end and kind of squish it into one vague, Eastern European mush. The character wouldn't work well against anyone who actually knew anything about Kazakhstan, because he's really at his best when he's playing off the ignorance and eccentricities we take for granted in the West. posted by: Christmas on 09.28.06 at 02:45 PM [permalink]"Turkey and Iran might be the only Muslim country with a strong nationalism." You should add Egypt to that list, too. posted by: Adam on 09.28.06 at 02:45 PM [permalink]I spent a month in the hinterlands of Kazakhstan (Kostenai) adopting my son, and have another story of religion there. In downtown of the regional capital, there's a huge mosque, and a huge Russian Orthodox church, both built in the early 1990's just after independence. Our translator explained that as soon as the Soviets left, international religious organiations started sponsoring these huge building projects. One of them allegedly altered its architectural plans so it would be a few feet taller than the other. So they're on the same block, just like the Methodists and Presbyterians in my New England home town, and in another parallel to New England, according to our translator, hardly anyone goes to either or them. Kazakhstan also refused to join the International Red Cross for many years because it refused to choose between the Red Cross and the Red Crescent symbols. The Borat character will annoy only the few Kazakhs who travel in the West. He may, however, make life difficult for my three-year-old proud Kazakh son in a few years when the character becomes known within the peer group. posted by: arthur on 09.28.06 at 02:45 PM [permalink]I think Mr. Drezner just flaunted that seem deep understanding of "Muslim" culture that led him to endorse our glorious adventure in Iraq. Huzzah! posted by: sglover on 09.28.06 at 02:45 PM [permalink]I wonder how a character who protrays Kazakhstan as populated by irredemably savage barbarians can possibly be considered funny against a historical background of multiple genocides committed against the Kazakhs over the 20th century, motivated by, well, the belief that the ethnos was irredeemably savage and barbarian. I'll laugh at Borat when I start laughing at jokes about Jews, Asians, and women. (Not gays; that's my in-group.) posted by: Randy McDonald on 09.28.06 at 02:45 PM [permalink]In the service of comedy, some wrongs are permitted. posted by: perianwyr on 09.28.06 at 02:45 PM [permalink]Post a Comment: |
Politics, economics, globalization, academia, pop culture... all from a
Main home page Reviews of DanielDrezner.com: "Sharp but informal commentary on politics and foreign policy." -- The New Republic "Dan Drezner is terrific.... Excellent blog." -- Andrew Sullivan "Dan's stuff is always worth reading." -- Eugene Volokh "One of the essential weblogs." -- Gawker.com "Old battle horse of the blogosphere." -- Jewcy.com "Soft porn." -- Amitai Etzioni "Spawned grave atrocities and vast destruction." -- Glenn Greenwald "Monday morning quarterback... conservative robot... the very foundation of troubles in this country." -- not-so-random readers Contact me at: ddrezner@gmail.com (But click here to read my e-mail policy) Search the Site TNR's Open University Jacob Levy Glenn Reynolds Andrew Sullivan Mickey Kaus Virginia Postrel The Volokh Conspiracy Josh Marshall Crooked Timber OxBlog Real Clear Politics Kevin Drum Across the Aisle Economist's Free Exchange TNR's The Plank NRO's The Corner TAP's Tapped America Abroad Duck of Minerva Opinio Juris Brad DeLong Jeff Jarvis Mystery Pollster Mark Kleiman Meryl Yourish Megan McArdle Marginal Revolution Michael Munger Chris Lawrence Matthew Yglesias Hit and Run Cold Spring Shops Stephen Green Outside the Beltway Pejman Yousefzadeh Laura McKenna (11D) Elected Swineherd Phil Carter Joe Gandelman Winds of Change Andrew Samwick Greg Mankiw Dani Rodrik Roger L. Simon Tom Maguire Greg Djerejian The American Scene Post Global Democracy Arsenal Recent articles online "Foreign Policy Goes Glam."The National Interest, November/December 2007 "Rise of the Hipster Statesmen." Newsweek International, November 1, 2007 "The New New World Order." Foreign Affairs, March/April 2007 "Mind the Gap." The National Interest, January/February 2007 "The Grandest Strategy Of Them All." Washington Post, December 17, 2006 U.S. Trade Strategy: Free Versus Fair Council on Foreign Relations Press, September 2006. Complete online article archive Blog Archives June 2008May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 Academia Area studies Book club culture economics fence-sitting from Blogger globalization homeland security international relations law Mediasphere My very important posts New Republic outsourcing personal politics Sports The blog paper the blogosphere thesis ideas Trade and Development U.S. foreign policy website maintenance See full archives listing Recent Entries • Someone keep Fleet Street away from Bill Clinton• It rivals Buckley vs. Vidal, I tell you • So.... are the Clintons morons? • The New York Times didn't ask me, but then again, that's why I have this blog • Monica Crowley's jet black pot • Al Qaeda is losing • Speaking of karma.... • The blog post that writes itself • What made me laugh today • Where should Hillary go? Site Credits |