![]() |
|
Sunday, October 1, 2006
previous entry | main | next entry | TrackBack (0)
The CPI bias at work in Burger King
For the past six weeks or so there' been an egaging, intermittent blog debate about CPI bias. That is, to what extent has technological innovation improved standards of living so much that the effects are understated in measuring year-to-year or decade-to-decade comparisons of the U.S. economy -- and whether, concomitantly, inflation measures lke the Consumer Price Index are overstated. The debate is less about whether CPI bias exists, but how big it is, whether its effect diffuses across all income strata within the economy, and its political implications. See this Megan McArdle post for the libertarian take, and this Brad DeLong post for the social democratic take. My take is similar to Megan's, but I haven't blogged about it because it can be very difficult to articulate the extent to which technology has converted what used to be luxury goods into normal goods. And the I opened my son's BK Kids Meal.... The toy in my son's meal was an Open Season-themed radio. Not just an ordinary radio, but one that hooked around the ear, making it look like a kids version of a cell phone earpiece. The battery is included. You can take a gander at it by clicking here and then clicking on "Toys". Thirty years ago, when I was a child, this would have been a $20 ($68.71 in 2006 dollars) birthday gift that would have made me the coolest kid on the block. It is now an afterthought, a free, promotional gift as part of a $4.00 kids meal that is affordable to 99% of all American households. If that seems hard to grasp, here's another way of looking at it -- I predict that by the time my son is my age, Burger King will include the equivalent of an IPod Nano in every kids meal. Does the CPI incorporate some of the effects discussed in this parable? Certainly it does, in the form of the declining cost of radios. Does it incorporate all of them? No -- the increasing sophistication of the toys contained within kids meals is not included. Readers are invited to submit other examples on a par with my son's kids meal as examples of how previously exotic technologies have become practically throwaway commodities. posted by Dan on 10.01.06 at 02:12 PMComments: At the area waterpark they sell one-use waterproof cameras. posted by: Jammer on 10.01.06 at 02:12 PM [permalink]Calculators -- a scientific calculator that cost $250 when I was in college is a giveaway item now. Long-distance telephone calls -- calls that used to cost several dollars a minute are now free and unlimited with a $25/month Vonage plan, and not just within the United States, but also to Mexico, Canada, UK, Ireland, France, Spain, and Italy. Broadband Internet -- we're in the middle of the transition to free or nearly free universal broadband access, with the multiplication of free WiFi hotspots and citywide free WiFi networks. I stayed at a hotel last week that charged $15/day for Internet access; this week I'm in a hotel that costs less and gives highspeed access away. We know which way prices are going. posted by: Gary Imhoff on 10.01.06 at 02:12 PM [permalink]Letters: the cost of stamps and paper and envelopes and all that might have risen, but the cost of sending a letter is now exactly zero cents. Travel: gasoline costs a lot, but how much does one have to spend to travel 100 miles? With air-conditioning? Newspapers: how much did it cost to read The NYT, the WaPo and the WSJ every day if you lived in the country? Even if you pay for the content online, how much does it cost now? Medicine: there's lots of stuff that used to be treated with surgery and can now be treated with pills. Copying: how much did it cost to make five copies of your dissertation, 50 years ago? posted by: Cisco on 10.01.06 at 02:12 PM [permalink]Just another example of China exporting deflation?? posted by: aruna urs on 10.01.06 at 02:12 PM [permalink]But let's put these changes in a different perspective by trying to apply some weights. Currently cell phone services have a weight in the CPI of 0.587%. In 1998 their weight was 0.059%. This means a 10% drop in the price of cell phone service now has the same weight as a 100% drop had in 1998. In 1946-48 when I was in the first -second grade my family did not have a phone. We got our first telephone in 1948. Now, which was the larger increase in standard of living -- my family getting a party line in 1948 or someone getting a cell phone in 1998? I do not know, but there has always been changes in technology that was not fully reflected in the data. The real question is was there a sudden change in the inability of the data to capture these changes in the late 1970s so that the sharp slowing of real percapita income growth that emerged around this time is incorrect? In other words, has the data become more inaccurate in recent years then it use to be? posted by: spencer on 10.01.06 at 02:12 PM [permalink]Will this comment also have lines through all the text except the first line? Will it also be posted at 2:12 PM? This seems to be a recurrent problem, or is it just me? posted by: lee on 10.01.06 at 02:12 PM [permalink]I too am trapped in 2:12pm, or AM I?!?! posted by: Bob on 10.01.06 at 02:12 PM [permalink]DVD players are dirt cheap. My wife is a teacher and the one in her classroom just got stolen. She bought a new one for $40. The last VCR I bought was more than twice that much posted by: Doug on 10.01.06 at 02:12 PM [permalink]Don't forget laptop computers. My parents paid $1500 for a mid-range laptop for me for college a little over six years ago. Now, a mid-range laptop from Dell is around $700, and it is fantastically better in every way than my original college laptop. If you want to spend $1500, you can get a truly amazing machine, and if you want to spend whatever $1500 dollars in 1999 would be in 2006, you can get virtually anything you want. posted by: I'llbeyou on 10.01.06 at 02:12 PM [permalink]My robot (Scooba) that cleans my floors cost $350. How much is never having to buy another mop (or Swiffer) and never having to use it worth, CPI-wise? posted by: mrsizer on 10.01.06 at 02:12 PM [permalink]Post a Comment: |
Politics, economics, globalization, academia, pop culture... all from a
Main home page Reviews of DanielDrezner.com: "Sharp but informal commentary on politics and foreign policy." -- The New Republic "Dan Drezner is terrific.... Excellent blog." -- Andrew Sullivan "Dan's stuff is always worth reading." -- Eugene Volokh "One of the essential weblogs." -- Gawker.com "Old battle horse of the blogosphere." -- Jewcy.com "Soft porn." -- Amitai Etzioni "Spawned grave atrocities and vast destruction." -- Glenn Greenwald "Monday morning quarterback... conservative robot... the very foundation of troubles in this country." -- not-so-random readers Contact me at: ddrezner@gmail.com (But click here to read my e-mail policy) Search the Site TNR's Open University Jacob Levy Glenn Reynolds Andrew Sullivan Mickey Kaus Virginia Postrel The Volokh Conspiracy Josh Marshall Crooked Timber OxBlog Real Clear Politics Kevin Drum Across the Aisle Economist's Free Exchange TNR's The Plank NRO's The Corner TAP's Tapped America Abroad Duck of Minerva Opinio Juris Brad DeLong Jeff Jarvis Mystery Pollster Mark Kleiman Meryl Yourish Megan McArdle Marginal Revolution Michael Munger Chris Lawrence Matthew Yglesias Hit and Run Cold Spring Shops Stephen Green Outside the Beltway Pejman Yousefzadeh Laura McKenna (11D) Elected Swineherd Phil Carter Joe Gandelman Winds of Change Andrew Samwick Greg Mankiw Dani Rodrik Roger L. Simon Tom Maguire Greg Djerejian The American Scene Post Global Democracy Arsenal Recent articles online "Foreign Policy Goes Glam."The National Interest, November/December 2007 "Rise of the Hipster Statesmen." Newsweek International, November 1, 2007 "The New New World Order." Foreign Affairs, March/April 2007 "Mind the Gap." The National Interest, January/February 2007 "The Grandest Strategy Of Them All." Washington Post, December 17, 2006 U.S. Trade Strategy: Free Versus Fair Council on Foreign Relations Press, September 2006. Complete online article archive Blog Archives June 2008May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 Academia Area studies Book club culture economics fence-sitting from Blogger globalization homeland security international relations law Mediasphere My very important posts New Republic outsourcing personal politics Sports The blog paper the blogosphere thesis ideas Trade and Development U.S. foreign policy website maintenance See full archives listing Recent Entries • Someone keep Fleet Street away from Bill Clinton• It rivals Buckley vs. Vidal, I tell you • So.... are the Clintons morons? • The New York Times didn't ask me, but then again, that's why I have this blog • Monica Crowley's jet black pot • Al Qaeda is losing • Speaking of karma.... • The blog post that writes itself • What made me laugh today • Where should Hillary go? Site Credits |