Sunday, October 1, 2006

previous entry | main | next entry | TrackBack (0)


The CPI bias at work in Burger King

For the past six weeks or so there' been an egaging, intermittent blog debate about CPI bias. That is, to what extent has technological innovation improved standards of living so much that the effects are understated in measuring year-to-year or decade-to-decade comparisons of the U.S. economy -- and whether, concomitantly, inflation measures lke the Consumer Price Index are overstated.

The debate is less about whether CPI bias exists, but how big it is, whether its effect diffuses across all income strata within the economy, and its political implications. See this Megan McArdle post for the libertarian take, and this Brad DeLong post for the social democratic take.

My take is similar to Megan's, but I haven't blogged about it because it can be very difficult to articulate the extent to which technology has converted what used to be luxury goods into normal goods.

And the I opened my son's BK Kids Meal....

The toy in my son's meal was an Open Season-themed radio. Not just an ordinary radio, but one that hooked around the ear, making it look like a kids version of a cell phone earpiece. The battery is included. You can take a gander at it by clicking here and then clicking on "Toys".

Thirty years ago, when I was a child, this would have been a $20 ($68.71 in 2006 dollars) birthday gift that would have made me the coolest kid on the block. It is now an afterthought, a free, promotional gift as part of a $4.00 kids meal that is affordable to 99% of all American households.

If that seems hard to grasp, here's another way of looking at it -- I predict that by the time my son is my age, Burger King will include the equivalent of an IPod Nano in every kids meal.

Does the CPI incorporate some of the effects discussed in this parable? Certainly it does, in the form of the declining cost of radios. Does it incorporate all of them? No -- the increasing sophistication of the toys contained within kids meals is not included.

Readers are invited to submit other examples on a par with my son's kids meal as examples of how previously exotic technologies have become practically throwaway commodities.

posted by Dan on 10.01.06 at 02:12 PM




Comments:

At the area waterpark they sell one-use waterproof cameras.

posted by: Jammer on 10.01.06 at 02:12 PM [permalink]



Calculators -- a scientific calculator that cost $250 when I was in college is a giveaway item now.

Long-distance telephone calls -- calls that used to cost several dollars a minute are now free and unlimited with a $25/month Vonage plan, and not just within the United States, but also to Mexico, Canada, UK, Ireland, France, Spain, and Italy.

Broadband Internet -- we're in the middle of the transition to free or nearly free universal broadband access, with the multiplication of free WiFi hotspots and citywide free WiFi networks. I stayed at a hotel last week that charged $15/day for Internet access; this week I'm in a hotel that costs less and gives highspeed access away. We know which way prices are going.

posted by: Gary Imhoff on 10.01.06 at 02:12 PM [permalink]



Letters: the cost of stamps and paper and envelopes and all that might have risen, but the cost of sending a letter is now exactly zero cents.

Travel: gasoline costs a lot, but how much does one have to spend to travel 100 miles? With air-conditioning?

Newspapers: how much did it cost to read The NYT, the WaPo and the WSJ every day if you lived in the country? Even if you pay for the content online, how much does it cost now?

Medicine: there's lots of stuff that used to be treated with surgery and can now be treated with pills.

Copying: how much did it cost to make five copies of your dissertation, 50 years ago?

posted by: Cisco on 10.01.06 at 02:12 PM [permalink]



Just another example of China exporting deflation??

posted by: aruna urs on 10.01.06 at 02:12 PM [permalink]



But let's put these changes in a different perspective by trying to apply some weights.

Currently cell phone services have a weight in the CPI of 0.587%. In 1998 their weight was 0.059%.

This means a 10% drop in the price of cell phone service now has the same weight as a 100% drop had in 1998.

In 1946-48 when I was in the first -second grade my family did not have a phone. We got our first telephone in 1948. Now, which was the larger increase in standard of living -- my family getting a party line in 1948 or someone getting a cell phone in 1998?

I do not know, but there has always been changes in technology that was not fully reflected in the data. The real question is was there a sudden change in the inability of the data to capture these changes in the late 1970s so that the sharp slowing of real percapita income growth that emerged around this time is incorrect? In other words, has the data become more inaccurate in recent years then it use to be?

posted by: spencer on 10.01.06 at 02:12 PM [permalink]



Will this comment also have lines through all the text except the first line? Will it also be posted at 2:12 PM? This seems to be a recurrent problem, or is it just me?

posted by: lee on 10.01.06 at 02:12 PM [permalink]



I too am trapped in 2:12pm, or AM I?!?!

posted by: Bob on 10.01.06 at 02:12 PM [permalink]



DVD players are dirt cheap. My wife is a teacher and the one in her classroom just got stolen. She bought a new one for $40. The last VCR I bought was more than twice that much

posted by: Doug on 10.01.06 at 02:12 PM [permalink]



Don't forget laptop computers. My parents paid $1500 for a mid-range laptop for me for college a little over six years ago. Now, a mid-range laptop from Dell is around $700, and it is fantastically better in every way than my original college laptop. If you want to spend $1500, you can get a truly amazing machine, and if you want to spend whatever $1500 dollars in 1999 would be in 2006, you can get virtually anything you want.

posted by: I'llbeyou on 10.01.06 at 02:12 PM [permalink]



My robot (Scooba) that cleans my floors cost $350. How much is never having to buy another mop (or Swiffer) and never having to use it worth, CPI-wise?

posted by: mrsizer on 10.01.06 at 02:12 PM [permalink]






Post a Comment:

Name:


Email Address:


URL:




Comments:


Remember your info?





Politics, economics, globalization, academia, pop culture... all from a untenured tenured perspective

Main home page
Main blog page
About Me
Search My Blog
Favorite Blogs
Book Recommendations
Books of the Month (Summer 2008)






Reviews of DanielDrezner.com:

"Sharp but informal commentary on politics and foreign policy." -- The New Republic

"Dan Drezner is terrific.... Excellent blog." -- Andrew Sullivan

"Dan's stuff is always worth reading." -- Eugene Volokh

"One of the essential weblogs." -- Gawker.com

"Old battle horse of the blogosphere." -- Jewcy.com

"Soft porn." -- Amitai Etzioni

"Spawned grave atrocities and vast destruction." -- Glenn Greenwald

"Monday morning quarterback... conservative robot... the very foundation of troubles in this country." -- not-so-random readers


Contact me at:
ddrezner@gmail.com
(But click here to read my e-mail policy)









Search the Site


Try advanced site search









Favorite Blogs

TNR's Open University
Jacob Levy
Glenn Reynolds
Andrew Sullivan
Mickey Kaus
Virginia Postrel
The Volokh Conspiracy
Josh Marshall
Crooked Timber
OxBlog
Real Clear Politics
Kevin Drum
Across the Aisle
Economist's Free Exchange
TNR's The Plank
NRO's The Corner
TAP's Tapped
America Abroad
Duck of Minerva
Opinio Juris
Brad DeLong

Jeff Jarvis
Mystery Pollster
Mark Kleiman
Meryl Yourish
Megan McArdle
Marginal Revolution
Michael Munger
Chris Lawrence
Matthew Yglesias
Hit and Run
Cold Spring Shops
Stephen Green
Outside the Beltway
Pejman Yousefzadeh
Laura McKenna (11D)
Elected Swineherd
Phil Carter
Joe Gandelman
Winds of Change
Andrew Samwick
Greg Mankiw
Dani Rodrik
Roger L. Simon
Tom Maguire
Greg Djerejian
The American Scene
Post Global
Democracy Arsenal




Recent articles online

"Foreign Policy Goes Glam."
The National Interest, November/December 2007

"Rise of the Hipster Statesmen."
Newsweek International, November 1, 2007

"The New New World Order."
Foreign Affairs, March/April 2007

"Mind the Gap."
The National Interest, January/February 2007

"The Grandest Strategy Of Them All."
Washington Post, December 17, 2006

U.S. Trade Strategy: Free Versus Fair
Council on Foreign Relations Press, September 2006.

Complete online article archive




Blog Archives

June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002

Academia
Area studies
Book club
culture
economics
fence-sitting
from Blogger
globalization
homeland security
international relations
law
Mediasphere
My very important posts
New Republic
outsourcing
personal
politics
Sports
The blog paper
the blogosphere
thesis ideas
Trade and Development
U.S. foreign policy
website maintenance

See full archives listing




Recent Entries

Someone keep Fleet Street away from Bill Clinton
It rivals Buckley vs. Vidal, I tell you
So.... are the Clintons morons?
The New York Times didn't ask me, but then again, that's why I have this blog
Monica Crowley's jet black pot
Al Qaeda is losing
Speaking of karma....
The blog post that writes itself
What made me laugh today
Where should Hillary go?




Site Credits