Monday, October 16, 2006

previous entry | main | next entry | TrackBack (0)


The economics of worlds colliding

I have never played World of Warcraft, Second Life, or any other simulated online game -- the closest I've come was my year-long semi-addiction to Civilization II.

However, for some reason I'm in the middle of one of those punctuated equilibrium in which I become inundated with information about a phenomenon that I was only dimly aware of before the equilibrium was achieved.

So I'm going to inflict all these links on you.

1) Reuters' Adam Pasick reports that the market for virtual goods is beginning to draw the attention of real-world tax authorities (hat tip: Greg Mankiw):

Users of online worlds such as Second Life and World of Warcraft transact millions of dollars worth of virtual goods and services every day, and these virtual economies are beginning to draw the attention of real-world authorities.

"Right now we're at the preliminary stages of looking at the issue and what kind of public policy questions virtual economies raise -- taxes, barter exchanges, property and wealth," said Dan Miller, senior economist for the Joint Economic Committee of the U.S. Congress.

The increasing size and public profile of virtual economies, the largest of which have millions of users and gross domestic products that rival those of small countries, have made them increasingly difficult for lawmakers and regulators to ignore.

Second Life, for example, was specifically designed by San Francisco-based Linden Lab to have a free-flowing market economy. Its internal currency, the Linden dollar, can be converted into U.S. dollars through an open currency exchange, making it effectively "real" money.

Inside Second Life, users can buy and sell virtual objects from T-shirts to helicopters, develop virtual real estate, or hire out services ranging from architecture to exotic dancing. Up to $500,000 in user-to-user transactions take place every day, and the Second Life economy is growing by 10 to 15 percent a month....

The rapid emergence of virtual economies has outstripped current tax law in many areas, but there are some clear-cut guidelines that already apply. For example, people who cash out of virtual economies by converting their assets into real-world currencies are required to report their incomes to the U.S. Internal Revenue Service or the tax authority where they live in the real world.

It is less clear how to deal with income and capital gains that never leave the virtual economy, income and capital gains that in the real world would be subject to taxes.

2) Indiana University's Joshua Fairfield and Edward Castronova have a draft paper entitled, "Dragon Kill Points: A Summary Whitepaper.":
This piece briefly describes the self-enforcing and non-pecuniary resource allocation system used by players in virtual worlds to allocate goods produced by a combination of player effort (the effort required to organize a group and overcome challenges) and the game itself (which “generates the good” – the input here is the time of the design staff).
3) Finally, I stumbled upon the South Park take on the whole World of Warcraft phenomenon. I got to see the entire episode before it was deleted for copyright reasons. This clip provides a nice precis of the show, however:

That is all.
posted by Dan on 10.16.06 at 10:39 AM




Comments:

Leeroy Jenkins!

posted by: Johnny Upton on 10.16.06 at 10:39 AM [permalink]



Brad DeLong: "There was a time when I had to decide whether to be a Civilization addict or an economics professor"

posted by: Polybius on 10.16.06 at 10:39 AM [permalink]



Oh, wait, it gets much better.

Adam Pasick is actually now Reuters's virtual correspondent in Second Life. As in, Reuters has opened a bureau there.

Story, ironically, via BBC News:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6054352.stm

posted by: JMB on 10.16.06 at 10:39 AM [permalink]



The episode is still actually availanle from Google video:

http://www.kotaku.com/gaming/south-park/world-of-warcraft-meets-south-park-the-complete-episode-205493.php

posted by: JS on 10.16.06 at 10:39 AM [permalink]



Our civil servants and it looks like our economists seem to have nothing better to do that think about taxing "virtual worlds".

I played Stock Ticker as a kid and NEVER did the SEC think that they should get involved. I played Risk and the Atomic Energy Commission nor International Court think that they needed to check on my weapons or treatment of captives. I play monopoly and collected rent and it was actually paper not "virtual" money and the IRS never had anyone (that I know of) think that they should tax my profits.

IT IS A GAME. IF IT GETS CONVERTED TO REAL MONEY THEN IT SHOULD BE TAXED.

posted by: Ian Power on 10.16.06 at 10:39 AM [permalink]



Erm... it does get taxed.

All of those 'virtual worlds' require a subscription fee. Those fees are paid with taxed income, and the company being paid pays taxes on it's revenue.

While I am confident that if there is anything there to tax, the IRS will find it, I am more than a little unclear on exactly what is there to tax.

Is the government going to start taking a share of the virtual gold pieces dropped by critters in WoW?

posted by: rosignol on 10.16.06 at 10:39 AM [permalink]



It seems to me that taxing "income and capital gains that never leave the virtual economy" would be exactly equivalent to taxing one's Monopoly winnings. If you pass Go and collect $200, do you have to file a 1040? (Yes, I know there are taxes within the Monopoly world.)

posted by: David Nieporent on 10.16.06 at 10:39 AM [permalink]



Taxing virtual income sounds silly, or at least like an abstruse, tax-review-level concern. However, a few obvious analogies suggest themselves. First, consider how barter for intangibles or services should be taxed. Second, consider whether unrepatriated tax haven income of a US resident should be taxed. In the first case, there's at least some psychological value that may have some economic measure. In the second, there's the psychological value of the unrecognized gain that could occur on conversion.

These examples suggest line-drawing possibilities for virtual economic activity.

One more analogy: virtual economic activity uses a private currency, much like securities transactions. Should there be exceptions to the general rule of conversion-equals-recognition, as with securities?

Just asking.

posted by: CS on 10.16.06 at 10:39 AM [permalink]






Post a Comment:

Name:


Email Address:


URL:




Comments:


Remember your info?





Politics, economics, globalization, academia, pop culture... all from a untenured tenured perspective

Main home page
Main blog page
About Me
Search My Blog
Favorite Blogs
Book Recommendations
Books of the Month (Summer 2008)






Reviews of DanielDrezner.com:

"Sharp but informal commentary on politics and foreign policy." -- The New Republic

"Dan Drezner is terrific.... Excellent blog." -- Andrew Sullivan

"Dan's stuff is always worth reading." -- Eugene Volokh

"One of the essential weblogs." -- Gawker.com

"Old battle horse of the blogosphere." -- Jewcy.com

"Soft porn." -- Amitai Etzioni

"Spawned grave atrocities and vast destruction." -- Glenn Greenwald

"Monday morning quarterback... conservative robot... the very foundation of troubles in this country." -- not-so-random readers


Contact me at:
ddrezner@gmail.com
(But click here to read my e-mail policy)









Search the Site


Try advanced site search









Favorite Blogs

TNR's Open University
Jacob Levy
Glenn Reynolds
Andrew Sullivan
Mickey Kaus
Virginia Postrel
The Volokh Conspiracy
Josh Marshall
Crooked Timber
OxBlog
Real Clear Politics
Kevin Drum
Across the Aisle
Economist's Free Exchange
TNR's The Plank
NRO's The Corner
TAP's Tapped
America Abroad
Duck of Minerva
Opinio Juris
Brad DeLong

Jeff Jarvis
Mystery Pollster
Mark Kleiman
Meryl Yourish
Megan McArdle
Marginal Revolution
Michael Munger
Chris Lawrence
Matthew Yglesias
Hit and Run
Cold Spring Shops
Stephen Green
Outside the Beltway
Pejman Yousefzadeh
Laura McKenna (11D)
Elected Swineherd
Phil Carter
Joe Gandelman
Winds of Change
Andrew Samwick
Greg Mankiw
Dani Rodrik
Roger L. Simon
Tom Maguire
Greg Djerejian
The American Scene
Post Global
Democracy Arsenal




Recent articles online

"Foreign Policy Goes Glam."
The National Interest, November/December 2007

"Rise of the Hipster Statesmen."
Newsweek International, November 1, 2007

"The New New World Order."
Foreign Affairs, March/April 2007

"Mind the Gap."
The National Interest, January/February 2007

"The Grandest Strategy Of Them All."
Washington Post, December 17, 2006

U.S. Trade Strategy: Free Versus Fair
Council on Foreign Relations Press, September 2006.

Complete online article archive




Blog Archives

June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002

Academia
Area studies
Book club
culture
economics
fence-sitting
from Blogger
globalization
homeland security
international relations
law
Mediasphere
My very important posts
New Republic
outsourcing
personal
politics
Sports
The blog paper
the blogosphere
thesis ideas
Trade and Development
U.S. foreign policy
website maintenance

See full archives listing




Recent Entries

Someone keep Fleet Street away from Bill Clinton
It rivals Buckley vs. Vidal, I tell you
So.... are the Clintons morons?
The New York Times didn't ask me, but then again, that's why I have this blog
Monica Crowley's jet black pot
Al Qaeda is losing
Speaking of karma....
The blog post that writes itself
What made me laugh today
Where should Hillary go?




Site Credits