![]() |
|
Friday, October 20, 2006
previous entry | main | next entry | TrackBack (0)
North Korea says they don't need no stinking tests
Despite reports earlier this week that North Korea had been planning three more nuclear tests, there are fresh reports that North Korea is saying there will be no more tests. From the Korea Times: North Korean leader Kim Jong-il told a ranking Chinese envoy that his country has no plan to conduct additional nuclear tests, the Yonhap News Agency reported on Friday (Oct. 20).Reacting to the news, Glenn Reynolds asks: "Is it because diplomacy worked? (Yay, Condi!) Or is it because his scientists told him there was no chance of a pulling off a successful test any time soon?" I'd say the answer is "none of the above." I'd have to go with "threats of Chinese economic coercion": China is weighing tough measures to curb North Korea's nuclear ambitions, with government experts calling for the reduction of critical supplies of oil and food that have helped sustain its isolated, impoverished neighbor.I shiuld confess that I have a theoretical stake in this answer -- but I don't think eirther diplomacy alone or Kim's worries about technical screw-ups are sufficient to explain this climbdown. Indeed, on the latter moltivation, one of the reasons to conduct nuclear tests is to figure out how to prevent mistakes in the future. The DPRK's first test -- which was a partial failure -- increased the incentive to conduct more tests. Whether the DPRK returns to six-party talks remains to be seen. Developing.... posted by Dan on 10.20.06 at 11:54 AMComments: When Glenn suggests that it may be diplomacy that is working with the North Koreans, I believe that he means that Bush's strategy of attacking the problem multilaterally, dragging the Chinese into the fray and forcing the Chinese to act in their own self interest (if for no other reason to keep Jpan non-nuclear), is a successful diplomatic strategy! Much better that diplomatic approach than the pursuit of bilateral talks with the North Koreans where the Chinese are not part of the process! posted by: RAZ on 10.20.06 at 11:54 AM [permalink]I doubt this is a case of Bush "dragging the Chinese" into anything. The Bush Administration, as far as I can tell, has been running in a circle wringing its hands trying to figure out what it can do about NK. Basically, it is--as one commentator here put it earlier--the Chinese are getting fed up with their weird little pet on the border and are doing calculations as to whether supporting him hasn't been more trouble then it's worth in developing local power. And with a "hardliner" in Japan who is quite stiff about NK, the last thing the Chinese want is to have Japan spooked into starting their own nuclear program. It's very good to play the wise old power in Asia, but if you want to gain authority, you gotta show you have it. So the financial cutbacks are the yank on NK's chain. posted by: tzs on 10.20.06 at 11:54 AM [permalink]This is really pretty unbelievable and ought to have a major impact. The question is whether it will cause NK to start acting reasonably or to go off and attack Japan or South Korea. posted by: China Law Blog on 10.20.06 at 11:54 AM [permalink]Why isn't "threats of sanctions" a form of diplomacy?
No one is happy about North Korea having an atomic weapon, but we should not delude ourselves. We do not know if they designed their test chamber to minimize the shock wave. Most of their plutonium is reactor grade. There is a fair chance that they would not use their limited stock the weapons grade plutonium for an inital test. A test done with reactor grade material will almost certainly result in some type of a fizzle detonation. This test will still verify that their implosion design is sound and probably yield a lot of other usful information. posted by: Bill D on 10.20.06 at 11:54 AM [permalink]Post a Comment: |
Politics, economics, globalization, academia, pop culture... all from a
Main home page Reviews of DanielDrezner.com: "Sharp but informal commentary on politics and foreign policy." -- The New Republic "Dan Drezner is terrific.... Excellent blog." -- Andrew Sullivan "Dan's stuff is always worth reading." -- Eugene Volokh "One of the essential weblogs." -- Gawker.com "Old battle horse of the blogosphere." -- Jewcy.com "Soft porn." -- Amitai Etzioni "Spawned grave atrocities and vast destruction." -- Glenn Greenwald "Monday morning quarterback... conservative robot... the very foundation of troubles in this country." -- not-so-random readers Contact me at: ddrezner@gmail.com (But click here to read my e-mail policy) Search the Site TNR's Open University Jacob Levy Glenn Reynolds Andrew Sullivan Mickey Kaus Virginia Postrel The Volokh Conspiracy Josh Marshall Crooked Timber OxBlog Real Clear Politics Kevin Drum Across the Aisle Economist's Free Exchange TNR's The Plank NRO's The Corner TAP's Tapped America Abroad Duck of Minerva Opinio Juris Brad DeLong Jeff Jarvis Mystery Pollster Mark Kleiman Meryl Yourish Megan McArdle Marginal Revolution Michael Munger Chris Lawrence Matthew Yglesias Hit and Run Cold Spring Shops Stephen Green Outside the Beltway Pejman Yousefzadeh Laura McKenna (11D) Elected Swineherd Phil Carter Joe Gandelman Winds of Change Andrew Samwick Greg Mankiw Dani Rodrik Roger L. Simon Tom Maguire Greg Djerejian The American Scene Post Global Democracy Arsenal Recent articles online "Foreign Policy Goes Glam."The National Interest, November/December 2007 "Rise of the Hipster Statesmen." Newsweek International, November 1, 2007 "The New New World Order." Foreign Affairs, March/April 2007 "Mind the Gap." The National Interest, January/February 2007 "The Grandest Strategy Of Them All." Washington Post, December 17, 2006 U.S. Trade Strategy: Free Versus Fair Council on Foreign Relations Press, September 2006. Complete online article archive Blog Archives June 2008May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 Academia Area studies Book club culture economics fence-sitting from Blogger globalization homeland security international relations law Mediasphere My very important posts New Republic outsourcing personal politics Sports The blog paper the blogosphere thesis ideas Trade and Development U.S. foreign policy website maintenance See full archives listing Recent Entries • Someone keep Fleet Street away from Bill Clinton• It rivals Buckley vs. Vidal, I tell you • So.... are the Clintons morons? • The New York Times didn't ask me, but then again, that's why I have this blog • Monica Crowley's jet black pot • Al Qaeda is losing • Speaking of karma.... • The blog post that writes itself • What made me laugh today • Where should Hillary go? Site Credits |