 |
|
Sunday, February 11, 2007
previous entry | main | next entry | TrackBack (5)
So that's how a competent Secretary of Defense acts
Yesterday Russian President Vladimir Putin went to town on the United States at the Munich Conference on Security Policy, according to the Financial Times: Vladimir Putin threw down the gauntlet to the west in a confrontational speech on Saturday, attacking what he called “illegal” US unilateral military action and arguing it had made the world more dangerous.Indeed, Putin says the following in his speech: Unilateral and frequently illegitimate actions have not resolved any problems. Moreover, they have caused new human tragedies and created new centres of tension. Judge for yourselves: wars as well as local and regional conflicts have not diminished.I wonder if any of Putin's advisors have the stones to tell him that, actually, he's wrong. That's not what this post is about, however. No, this post is about how the Secretary of Defense responded to Putin's rhetorical blast. Here's the opening of Bob Gates's speech: [A]s an old Cold Warrior, one of yesterday’s speeches almost filled me with nostalgia for a less complex time. Almost.Gates' deft deflection of Putin's charges seem to be going down well in the press. It's been so long since an American official reacted so correctly to empty bluster that I'd almost forgotten how it should be done. UPDATE: In Slate, Phil Carter finds other elements to praise in Gates. posted by Dan on 02.11.07 at 11:09 PMComments: A big story was indeed Gate's response & indeed his entire speech, here is a Sec. of Def. now who understands diplomacy & portrays strength ( His four wars analysis seems very solid ). Nigel P.S. To be honest, I don't think the speech was about directly about the subject as such, it was about testing reactions, positioning & testing public support for Russia's foreign policy ( domestic & overseas ), with perhaps the motivation of provoking the US into really over spending on defense ( or causing even more splitting of priorities ), whatever I don't see it as a minor play, it was a very calculated & deliberate speech IMHO, the motivations for which could take some time to reveal themselves. posted by: Nigel on 02.11.07 at 11:09 PM [permalink]...with perhaps the motivation of provoking the US into really over spending on defense... I'd hate to see what that looks like. We're already at 6%+ of GDP. No doubt, though, this was a combination probe/shot across the bow. I'd add, also, the opening salvo in a product rollout campaign: Russia as global power, v2.0 posted by: Headline Junky on 02.11.07 at 11:09 PM [permalink]Compare Cheney snubbing Kyuma, the Japanese Defense Minister, eh? posted by: todmc on 02.11.07 at 11:09 PM [permalink]I don't think Putin's remarks are ominous, rather, like the majority of foreign policy posturing they are intended for domestic consumption. There is almost no political down-side to publicly dressing down the US right now. posted by: Pete on 02.11.07 at 11:09 PM [permalink]Hmm... I guess everyone knows that the best way to deal with a bully is to let him continue to bully you. posted by: blue on 02.11.07 at 11:09 PM [permalink]Putin is in no position to "bully" the United States. Thus, he is not a bully since none of his threats to the US are creditable. posted by: msj on 02.11.07 at 11:09 PM [permalink]Yep... no position to bully. Hmm... wonder where all those nukes are? Wonder who is helping Iran? Wonder who is threatening to cut gas and oil off to our NATO allies. posted by: blue on 02.11.07 at 11:09 PM [permalink]I don't see why Dan makes the implicit contrast to Rumsfeld. He was hardly a bomb-thrower against Putin or Russia. It was France and Italy he pissed off. Gates is following the same pattern--shrug off Putin's provocations and scold the Continentals for their wavering support of the war on terror. posted by: srp on 02.11.07 at 11:09 PM [permalink]Post a Comment: |
 Politics, economics, globalization, academia, pop culture... all from a
Main home page  Reviews of DanielDrezner.com: "Sharp but informal commentary on politics and foreign policy." -- The New Republic "Dan Drezner is terrific.... Excellent blog." -- Andrew Sullivan "Dan's stuff is always worth reading." -- Eugene Volokh "One of the essential weblogs." -- Gawker.com "Old battle horse of the blogosphere." -- Jewcy.com "Soft porn." -- Amitai Etzioni "Spawned grave atrocities and vast destruction." -- Glenn Greenwald "Monday morning quarterback... conservative robot... the very foundation of troubles in this country." -- not-so-random readers Contact me at: ddrezner@gmail.com (But click here to read my e-mail policy) Search the Site TNR's Open University Jacob Levy Glenn Reynolds Andrew Sullivan Mickey Kaus Virginia Postrel The Volokh Conspiracy Josh Marshall Crooked Timber OxBlog Real Clear Politics Kevin Drum Across the Aisle Economist's Free Exchange TNR's The Plank NRO's The Corner TAP's Tapped America Abroad Duck of Minerva Opinio Juris Brad DeLong Jeff Jarvis Mystery Pollster Mark Kleiman Meryl Yourish Megan McArdle Marginal Revolution Michael Munger Chris Lawrence Matthew Yglesias Hit and Run Cold Spring Shops Stephen Green Outside the Beltway Pejman Yousefzadeh Laura McKenna (11D) Elected Swineherd Phil Carter Joe Gandelman Winds of Change Andrew Samwick Greg Mankiw Dani Rodrik Roger L. Simon Tom Maguire Greg Djerejian The American Scene Post Global Democracy Arsenal Recent articles online "Foreign Policy Goes Glam."The National Interest, November/December 2007 "Rise of the Hipster Statesmen." Newsweek International, November 1, 2007 "The New New World Order." Foreign Affairs, March/April 2007 "Mind the Gap." The National Interest, January/February 2007 "The Grandest Strategy Of Them All." Washington Post, December 17, 2006 U.S. Trade Strategy: Free Versus Fair Council on Foreign Relations Press, September 2006. Complete online article archive Blog Archives June 2008May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 Academia Area studies Book club culture economics fence-sitting from Blogger globalization homeland security international relations law Mediasphere My very important posts New Republic outsourcing personal politics Sports The blog paper the blogosphere thesis ideas Trade and Development U.S. foreign policy website maintenance See full archives listing Recent Entries • Someone keep Fleet Street away from Bill Clinton• It rivals Buckley vs. Vidal, I tell you • So.... are the Clintons morons? • The New York Times didn't ask me, but then again, that's why I have this blog • Monica Crowley's jet black pot • Al Qaeda is losing • Speaking of karma.... • The blog post that writes itself • What made me laugh today • Where should Hillary go? Site Credits 
|