![]() |
|
Monday, July 9, 2007
previous entry | main | next entry | TrackBack (0)
Why there will never be a reality show about academia
Four years ago (?!!), I blogged the following: [T]he caricature of academia in popular culture is a collection of lecherous white male who inevitably bed one or more of their students.In The American Scholar, William Deresiewicz uses many more paragraphs to make a similar point: Look at recent movies about academics, and a remarkably consistent pattern emerges. In The Squid and the Whale (2005), Jeff Daniels plays an English professor and failed writer who sleeps with his students, neglects his wife, and bullies his children. In One True Thing (1998), William Hurt plays an English professor and failed writer who sleeps with his students, neglects his wife, and bullies his children. In Wonder Boys (2000), Michael Douglas plays an English professor and failed writer who sleeps with his students, has just been left by his third wife, and can’t commit to the child he’s conceived in an adulterous affair with his chancellor. Daniels’s character is vain, selfish, resentful, and immature. Hurt’s is vain, selfish, pompous, and self-pitying. Douglas’s is vain, selfish, resentful, and self-pitying. Hurt’s character drinks. Douglas’s drinks, smokes pot, and takes pills. All three men measure themselves against successful writers (two of them, in Douglas’s case; his own wife, in Daniels’s) whose presence diminishes them further. In We Don’t Live Here Anymore (2004), Mark Ruffalo and Peter Krause divide the central role: both are English professors, and both neglect and cheat on their wives, but Krause plays the arrogant, priapic writer who seduces his students, Ruffalo the passive, self-pitying failure. A Love Song For Bobby Long (2004) divides the stereotype a different way, with John Travolta as the washed-up, alcoholic English professor, Gabriel Macht as the blocked, alcoholic writer.Deresiewicz answers his own question with a Jungian flourish ( "they are a way of articulating the superiority of female values to male ones: of love, community, and self-sacrifice to ambition, success, and fame"). Actually, there are several Jungian flourishes, to match the many answers he provides. Rather than tangle with Deresiewicz, let me offer up an explanation, provided my the Official Blogwife, that Deresiewicz leaves unexplored: "The reason professors sleep with their students in fiction is because any realistic portrayal of your jobs would bore readers out of their skulls within ten minutes." Alas, this is true. I'd like to think I've carved out an interesting career, but a diary of a typical working day for me would probably run as follows: 9:00 A.M.: Dan turns on computer.And so on. UPDATE: Jeez, even the librarians have more fun. At least, however, professors retain their mighty fun advantage over either economic journalists or graduate students. Comments: "Why are these professors all men...?" Well, there was Garp's wife, but IIRC she didn't have tenure, so maybe that doesn't count. posted by: Incompetence Dodger on 07.09.07 at 09:36 AM [permalink]"The reason professors sleep with their students in fiction is because any realistic portrayal of your jobs would bore readers out of their skulls within ten minutes." Right, but there are other ways to make things unrealistically interesting. For example, Harrison Ford's Indiana Jones character doesn't sleep with his students -- not even the ones who write "Love" "You" on their eyelids. Instead, he crawls out his office window to escape the attention and takes off for adventure. Of course, in real life, male professors *do* marry their younger students. As it happens, right across the street from me are two houses owned by male professors who married younger ex-students (though they're both great guys and in neither case did they cheat on and divorce a first wife). posted by: Slocum on 07.09.07 at 09:36 AM [permalink]Yah. We could tell your basic thinking/investigation skills were slipping when you needed help deciphering the cartoonist's tag... Personally, I blame the cushy soft entitlement mentality -- no genders or races necessarily advantaged: "Um, can you do my 'work' for me?" Catches up, you know? (Maybe you need a spanking for blowing past the 10-day deadline? Now that might have racial/gender traits in common, but I'm not going there today. :) "Mommy!") posted by: anonymous on 07.09.07 at 09:36 AM [permalink]The alternative portrayal the article notes is the Dead Poets Society version. Given the choice, I'll stick with the lecherous version, because most of the movies named in the paragraphs above are very, very good and the regular remakes of Dead Poets Society (which are really remakes of Goodbye, Mr. Chips) are almost always terrible. The article's about movies, and Dan's blogged about it before with respect to television, but the stereotype is in novels, too-- not only "academic novels," which take adultery and sleeping with students as their usual plot engines, but in, e.g., Disgrace, or The Corrections-- the latter a novel that gets much of its traction from he clever manipulation of massively-overfamiliar cultural tropes and zeitgeist references. The pathetic lecherous white male prof is in the Corrections Cultural Trope Hall Of Fame. posted by: Jacob T. Levy on 07.09.07 at 09:36 AM [permalink]9:56 A.M.: Dan scratches ass. Your own? One belonging to one of your students? You need to be more clear if you are attacking the stereotype or supporting it. posted by: AB on 07.09.07 at 09:36 AM [permalink]I think we have to exempt anything based on a John Irving Novel; heaven forbid they ever make "The 158-Pound Marriage" into a film. (My also-an-academic spouse points out that, in the TV show "Jack and Bobby," it's a female (history) prof who sleeps with her (male) graduate student. Of course, there's always "Third Rock from the Sun"...). I think we have to exempt anything based on a John Irving Novel; heaven forbid they ever make "The 158-Pound Marriage" into a film. (My also-an-academic spouse points out that, in the TV show "Jack and Bobby," it's a female (history) prof who sleeps with her (male) graduate student. Of course, there's always "Third Rock from the Sun"...). A profession is pretty boring movie-wise, when the camera guys seeking action shots to go with the interviews take video of either you typing on a computer or flipping through a book. We may have interesting things to say, but not so much to do/watch. posted by: Steve Saideman on 07.09.07 at 09:36 AM [permalink]At least after all that Jungian analysis you are also safe in knowing that there will never be a "reality show" about psychiatrists either. (In the movies they are either crazy or sleep with their patients or their patients relatives.) posted by: Mikeyes on 07.09.07 at 09:36 AM [permalink]I realize that I now await the movie which features a cute woman shrink falling in bed with the crusty aging professor who she is both: (i) psychoanalyzing and (ii) taking a class from. Or has that already been done? posted by: Appalled Moderate on 07.09.07 at 09:36 AM [permalink]A creature of my time, the first film I thought of when Dan mentioned academia in the movies was "Knute Rockne, All-American." I mean, even students who can't remember the name of their own English professors know who the football coach is. Here in Madison they erected a statue to the last one. There are not too many poli-sci professors memorialized in that way. posted by: Zathras on 07.09.07 at 09:36 AM [permalink]Wait, the rest of you don't sleep with your students? Not even before you were married? It's not even unethical if you restrict yourself to strong "A" students (that way you and they know there is nothing to gain/lose). posted by: Anonymouse on 07.09.07 at 09:36 AM [permalink]Thanks for the insipration in your daily schedule. 9:30 A.M.: Dan considers writing referee report that was due ten days ago; decides it's better tackled after lunch. Read this after perusing your post on pop culture (and watching the videos too). Got me inspired to finish the draft of a grant report that I've been putting off. posted by: Nikolas Gvosdev on 07.09.07 at 09:36 AM [permalink]I seem to recall that Saul Bellow, and Phillip Roth have novels like that also. Herzog, The Ghost Writer,.... I'm sure that there are others posted by: chris on 07.09.07 at 09:36 AM [permalink]Michael Caine & Julie Walters, "Educating Rita." 1983. But, then, Dan, you probably don't remember than far back... posted by: Donald A. Coffin on 07.09.07 at 09:36 AM [permalink]"It's not only English professors." Nope. It's mostly English professors, but the rest of the Humanities have some representation. It looks like social scientists + scientists are safe though. I guess it's easy to dramatize Research in a movie, so scientists can just focus on that. Dramatizing literary analysis is rather more difficult. posted by: Alex F on 07.09.07 at 09:36 AM [permalink]Other movies with 'wacky' academics ... 'Under the Tuscan Sun' and 'A Beautiful Mind'. btw ... I think a road trip movie with Professors I think the stereotype exists because it is true. At undergrad, masters and PhD level, and afterwards on faculty, I knew of male profs who slept with female students. And my wife as an undergrad had affair with her 47 year old English prof. As for why are English profs and humanities in general over-represented? Two reasons Well, well how could we all forget the noted Harvard Symbologist Dr. Robert Langdon, who cracks ancient mysteries and remains totally cool in the presence of delicate Sophie Neveu! Are Dr. Langdon's books even peer-reviewed? Does he obsessively check his emails to see if there is any word from the editor? Does he crumble when he sees referee reports that are longer than his essay? Hmmm....I don't think so. I am sure he is tenured and at Harvard. That's why he can get away by publishing with Random House and not with Princeton and Chicago. Now, I am back to drafting another obscure article that nobody will read or cite (assuming it ever gets published) and I don’t even dream of sending it to APSR (do you know they reject 88 percent of the articles). i recall 4 UC poli sci profs fitting the philandering stereotype in the pre-drezner era. posted by: david on 07.09.07 at 09:36 AM [permalink]You left out Donald Sutherland as the lecherous professor in Animal House! posted by: bud on 07.09.07 at 09:36 AM [permalink]You don't turn on your computer until 9am? It's been a while since the workstudy in my gradschool's budget office, although I still remember the sound of pens hitting desktops at 5pm. Don't forget Dr. Jonathan "I'd Like to Climb All Over Him" Hemlock in the Eiger Sanction. Baddest Movie Professor of All Time until Indiana Jones brought the box office. An a gentleman, too, sending the naughtly little grade-grubbing minx away with only a pat on the fanny to get her out the door. --furious I'm kinda late to this thread but I was just reading a book review from a couple of years back by Joseph Epstein that hits it just about right. He was reviewing a book called, "Faculty Towers: The Academic Novel and Its Discontents" by Elaine Showalter. Epstein writes: 'Professor Showalter does not go in much for discussing the sex that is at the center of so many academic novels. Which reminds me that the first time I met Edward Shils, he asked me what I was reading. When I said The War Between the Tates by Alison Lurie, he replied, "Academic screwing, I presume." He presumed rightly. How could it be otherwise with academic novels? Apart from the rather pathetic power struggles over department chairmanships, or professorial appointments, love affairs, usually adulterous or officially outlawed ones, provide the only thing resembling drama on offer on the contemporary university campus.' posted by: craig mclaughlin on 07.09.07 at 09:36 AM [permalink]cqxeh pastb cqektzair ekza dlpob jmsvetf zkta posted by: tqxlcvhp tfsrxqkao on 07.09.07 at 09:36 AM [permalink]Post a Comment: |
Politics, economics, globalization, academia, pop culture... all from a
Main home page Reviews of DanielDrezner.com: "Sharp but informal commentary on politics and foreign policy." -- The New Republic "Dan Drezner is terrific.... Excellent blog." -- Andrew Sullivan "Dan's stuff is always worth reading." -- Eugene Volokh "One of the essential weblogs." -- Gawker.com "Old battle horse of the blogosphere." -- Jewcy.com "Soft porn." -- Amitai Etzioni "Spawned grave atrocities and vast destruction." -- Glenn Greenwald "Monday morning quarterback... conservative robot... the very foundation of troubles in this country." -- not-so-random readers Contact me at: ddrezner@gmail.com (But click here to read my e-mail policy) Search the Site TNR's Open University Jacob Levy Glenn Reynolds Andrew Sullivan Mickey Kaus Virginia Postrel The Volokh Conspiracy Josh Marshall Crooked Timber OxBlog Real Clear Politics Kevin Drum Across the Aisle Economist's Free Exchange TNR's The Plank NRO's The Corner TAP's Tapped America Abroad Duck of Minerva Opinio Juris Brad DeLong Jeff Jarvis Mystery Pollster Mark Kleiman Meryl Yourish Megan McArdle Marginal Revolution Michael Munger Chris Lawrence Matthew Yglesias Hit and Run Cold Spring Shops Stephen Green Outside the Beltway Pejman Yousefzadeh Laura McKenna (11D) Elected Swineherd Phil Carter Joe Gandelman Winds of Change Andrew Samwick Greg Mankiw Dani Rodrik Roger L. Simon Tom Maguire Greg Djerejian The American Scene Post Global Democracy Arsenal Recent articles online "Foreign Policy Goes Glam."The National Interest, November/December 2007 "Rise of the Hipster Statesmen." Newsweek International, November 1, 2007 "The New New World Order." Foreign Affairs, March/April 2007 "Mind the Gap." The National Interest, January/February 2007 "The Grandest Strategy Of Them All." Washington Post, December 17, 2006 U.S. Trade Strategy: Free Versus Fair Council on Foreign Relations Press, September 2006. Complete online article archive Blog Archives June 2008May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 Academia Area studies Book club culture economics fence-sitting from Blogger globalization homeland security international relations law Mediasphere My very important posts New Republic outsourcing personal politics Sports The blog paper the blogosphere thesis ideas Trade and Development U.S. foreign policy website maintenance See full archives listing Recent Entries • Someone keep Fleet Street away from Bill Clinton• It rivals Buckley vs. Vidal, I tell you • So.... are the Clintons morons? • The New York Times didn't ask me, but then again, that's why I have this blog • Monica Crowley's jet black pot • Al Qaeda is losing • Speaking of karma.... • The blog post that writes itself • What made me laugh today • Where should Hillary go? Site Credits |