Monday, July 9, 2007

previous entry | main | next entry | TrackBack (0)


Why there will never be a reality show about academia

Four years ago (?!!), I blogged the following:

[T]he caricature of academia in popular culture is a collection of lecherous white male who inevitably bed one or more of their students.
In The American Scholar, William Deresiewicz uses many more paragraphs to make a similar point:
Look at recent movies about academics, and a remarkably consistent pattern emerges. In The Squid and the Whale (2005), Jeff Daniels plays an English professor and failed writer who sleeps with his students, neglects his wife, and bullies his children. In One True Thing (1998), William Hurt plays an English professor and failed writer who sleeps with his students, neglects his wife, and bullies his children. In Wonder Boys (2000), Michael Douglas plays an English professor and failed writer who sleeps with his students, has just been left by his third wife, and can’t commit to the child he’s conceived in an adulterous affair with his chancellor. Daniels’s character is vain, selfish, resentful, and immature. Hurt’s is vain, selfish, pompous, and self-pitying. Douglas’s is vain, selfish, resentful, and self-pitying. Hurt’s character drinks. Douglas’s drinks, smokes pot, and takes pills. All three men measure themselves against successful writers (two of them, in Douglas’s case; his own wife, in Daniels’s) whose presence diminishes them further. In We Don’t Live Here Anymore (2004), Mark Ruffalo and Peter Krause divide the central role: both are English professors, and both neglect and cheat on their wives, but Krause plays the arrogant, priapic writer who seduces his students, Ruffalo the passive, self-pitying failure. A Love Song For Bobby Long (2004) divides the stereotype a different way, with John Travolta as the washed-up, alcoholic English professor, Gabriel Macht as the blocked, alcoholic writer.

Not that these figures always teach English. Kevin Spacey plays a philosophy professor — broken, bitter, dissolute — in The Life of David Gale (2003). Steve Carell plays a self-loathing, suicidal Proust scholar in Little Miss Sunshine (2006). Both characters fall for graduate students, with disastrous results. And while the stereotype has gained a new prominence of late, its roots go back at least a few decades. Many of its elements are in place in Oleanna (1994), in Surviving Desire (1991), and, with John Mahoney’s burnt-out communications professor, in Moonstruck (1987). In fact, all of its elements are in place in Terms of Endearment (1983), where Jeff Daniels took his first turn playing a feckless, philandering English professor. And of course, almost two decades before that, there was Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf?

What’s going on here? If the image of the absent-minded professor stood for benevolent unworldliness, what is the meaning of the new academic stereotype? Why are so many of these failed professors also failed writers? Why is professional futility so often connected with sexual impropriety? (In both Terms of Endearment and We Don’t Live Here Anymore, “going to the library” becomes a euphemism for “going to sleep with a student.”) Why are these professors all men, and why are all the ones who are married such miserable husbands?

Deresiewicz answers his own question with a Jungian flourish ( "they are a way of articulating the superiority of female values to male ones: of love, community, and self-sacrifice to ambition, success, and fame"). Actually, there are several Jungian flourishes, to match the many answers he provides.

Rather than tangle with Deresiewicz, let me offer up an explanation, provided my the Official Blogwife, that Deresiewicz leaves unexplored: "The reason professors sleep with their students in fiction is because any realistic portrayal of your jobs would bore readers out of their skulls within ten minutes."

Alas, this is true. I'd like to think I've carved out an interesting career, but a diary of a typical working day for me would probably run as follows:

9:00 A.M.: Dan turns on computer.

9:01 A.M.: Dan checks e-mail.

9:10 A.M.: Dan surfs news sites.

9:30 A.M.: Dan considers writing referee report that was due ten days ago; decides it's better tackled after lunch.

9:31 A.M.: Dan opens up Word document containing manuscript du jour and stares blankly at it for a while.

9:41 A.M.: Dan decides that he's really itching to work on the other manuscript du jour, because this is where his mind is wandering. He opens up that document and stares blankly at it for a while.

9:51 A.M.: On a good day, Dan gets a small piece of inspiration that he quickly converts into a paragraph of prose that will buttress his thesis.

9:56 A.M.: Dan scratches his ass.

And so on.

UPDATE: Jeez, even the librarians have more fun. At least, however, professors retain their mighty fun advantage over either economic journalists or graduate students.

posted by Dan on 07.09.07 at 09:36 AM




Comments:

"Why are these professors all men...?"

Well, there was Garp's wife, but IIRC she didn't have tenure, so maybe that doesn't count.

posted by: Incompetence Dodger on 07.09.07 at 09:36 AM [permalink]



"The reason professors sleep with their students in fiction is because any realistic portrayal of your jobs would bore readers out of their skulls within ten minutes."

Right, but there are other ways to make things unrealistically interesting. For example, Harrison Ford's Indiana Jones character doesn't sleep with his students -- not even the ones who write "Love" "You" on their eyelids. Instead, he crawls out his office window to escape the attention and takes off for adventure.

Of course, in real life, male professors *do* marry their younger students. As it happens, right across the street from me are two houses owned by male professors who married younger ex-students (though they're both great guys and in neither case did they cheat on and divorce a first wife).

posted by: Slocum on 07.09.07 at 09:36 AM [permalink]



Yah. We could tell your basic thinking/investigation skills were slipping when you needed help deciphering the cartoonist's tag...

Personally, I blame the cushy soft entitlement mentality -- no genders or races necessarily advantaged: "Um, can you do my 'work' for me?"

Catches up, you know? (Maybe you need a spanking for blowing past the 10-day deadline? Now that might have racial/gender traits in common, but I'm not going there today. :) "Mommy!")

posted by: anonymous on 07.09.07 at 09:36 AM [permalink]



The alternative portrayal the article notes is the Dead Poets Society version. Given the choice, I'll stick with the lecherous version, because most of the movies named in the paragraphs above are very, very good and the regular remakes of Dead Poets Society (which are really remakes of Goodbye, Mr. Chips) are almost always terrible.

The article's about movies, and Dan's blogged about it before with respect to television, but the stereotype is in novels, too-- not only "academic novels," which take adultery and sleeping with students as their usual plot engines, but in, e.g., Disgrace, or The Corrections-- the latter a novel that gets much of its traction from he clever manipulation of massively-overfamiliar cultural tropes and zeitgeist references. The pathetic lecherous white male prof is in the Corrections Cultural Trope Hall Of Fame.

posted by: Jacob T. Levy on 07.09.07 at 09:36 AM [permalink]



9:56 A.M.: Dan scratches ass.

Your own? One belonging to one of your students? You need to be more clear if you are attacking the stereotype or supporting it.

posted by: AB on 07.09.07 at 09:36 AM [permalink]



I think we have to exempt anything based on a John Irving Novel; heaven forbid they ever make "The 158-Pound Marriage" into a film.

(My also-an-academic spouse points out that, in the TV show "Jack and Bobby," it's a female (history) prof who sleeps with her (male) graduate student. Of course, there's always "Third Rock from the Sun"...).

posted by: PR on 07.09.07 at 09:36 AM [permalink]



I think we have to exempt anything based on a John Irving Novel; heaven forbid they ever make "The 158-Pound Marriage" into a film.

(My also-an-academic spouse points out that, in the TV show "Jack and Bobby," it's a female (history) prof who sleeps with her (male) graduate student. Of course, there's always "Third Rock from the Sun"...).

posted by: PR on 07.09.07 at 09:36 AM [permalink]



A profession is pretty boring movie-wise, when the camera guys seeking action shots to go with the interviews take video of either you typing on a computer or flipping through a book.
Both have happened to me after doing interviews with local media types so that they could have some more active shots to go with the interview.

We may have interesting things to say, but not so much to do/watch.

posted by: Steve Saideman on 07.09.07 at 09:36 AM [permalink]



At least after all that Jungian analysis you are also safe in knowing that there will never be a "reality show" about psychiatrists either. (In the movies they are either crazy or sleep with their patients or their patients relatives.)

posted by: Mikeyes on 07.09.07 at 09:36 AM [permalink]



I realize that I now await the movie which features a cute woman shrink falling in bed with the crusty aging professor who she is both: (i) psychoanalyzing and (ii) taking a class from. Or has that already been done?

posted by: Appalled Moderate on 07.09.07 at 09:36 AM [permalink]



A creature of my time, the first film I thought of when Dan mentioned academia in the movies was "Knute Rockne, All-American."

I mean, even students who can't remember the name of their own English professors know who the football coach is. Here in Madison they erected a statue to the last one. There are not too many poli-sci professors memorialized in that way.

posted by: Zathras on 07.09.07 at 09:36 AM [permalink]



Wait, the rest of you don't sleep with your students? Not even before you were married?

It's not even unethical if you restrict yourself to strong "A" students (that way you and they know there is nothing to gain/lose).

posted by: Anonymouse on 07.09.07 at 09:36 AM [permalink]



Thanks for the insipration in your daily schedule.

9:30 A.M.: Dan considers writing referee report that was due ten days ago; decides it's better tackled after lunch.

Read this after perusing your post on pop culture (and watching the videos too). Got me inspired to finish the draft of a grant report that I've been putting off.

posted by: Nikolas Gvosdev on 07.09.07 at 09:36 AM [permalink]



I seem to recall that Saul Bellow, and Phillip Roth have novels like that also. Herzog, The Ghost Writer,.... I'm sure that there are others

posted by: chris on 07.09.07 at 09:36 AM [permalink]



Michael Caine & Julie Walters, "Educating Rita." 1983. But, then, Dan, you probably don't remember than far back...

posted by: Donald A. Coffin on 07.09.07 at 09:36 AM [permalink]



"It's not only English professors."

Nope. It's mostly English professors, but the rest of the Humanities have some representation.

It looks like social scientists + scientists are safe though. I guess it's easy to dramatize Research in a movie, so scientists can just focus on that. Dramatizing literary analysis is rather more difficult.

posted by: Alex F on 07.09.07 at 09:36 AM [permalink]



Other movies with 'wacky' academics ...

'Under the Tuscan Sun' and 'A Beautiful Mind'.

btw ... I think a road trip movie with Professors
Churchill, Finkelstein and Chomsky would outsell
"Sicko" ... or perhaps be named "Sicko II - just
when you thought it was safe to send your children
to College!"

posted by: LordActon on 07.09.07 at 09:36 AM [permalink]



I think the stereotype exists because it is true. At undergrad, masters and PhD level, and afterwards on faculty, I knew of male profs who slept with female students. And my wife as an undergrad had affair with her 47 year old English prof.

As for why are English profs and humanities in general over-represented? Two reasons
1. sciences et al had far fewer female students for creepy male profs to prey on
2. authors, screenwriters etc. more likely to have been English/humanities/film students and observed this behavior.

posted by: anonymous2 on 07.09.07 at 09:36 AM [permalink]



Well, well how could we all forget the noted Harvard Symbologist Dr. Robert Langdon, who cracks ancient mysteries and remains totally cool in the presence of delicate Sophie Neveu!

Are Dr. Langdon's books even peer-reviewed? Does he obsessively check his emails to see if there is any word from the editor? Does he crumble when he sees referee reports that are longer than his essay? Hmmm....I don't think so. I am sure he is tenured and at Harvard. That's why he can get away by publishing with Random House and not with Princeton and Chicago.

Now, I am back to drafting another obscure article that nobody will read or cite (assuming it ever gets published) and I don’t even dream of sending it to APSR (do you know they reject 88 percent of the articles).

posted by: Academic Troller on 07.09.07 at 09:36 AM [permalink]



i recall 4 UC poli sci profs fitting the philandering stereotype in the pre-drezner era.

posted by: david on 07.09.07 at 09:36 AM [permalink]



You left out Donald Sutherland as the lecherous professor in Animal House!

posted by: bud on 07.09.07 at 09:36 AM [permalink]



You don't turn on your computer until 9am? It's been a while since the workstudy in my gradschool's budget office, although I still remember the sound of pens hitting desktops at 5pm.

Don't forget Dr. Jonathan "I'd Like to Climb All Over Him" Hemlock in the Eiger Sanction. Baddest Movie Professor of All Time until Indiana Jones brought the box office. An a gentleman, too, sending the naughtly little grade-grubbing minx away with only a pat on the fanny to get her out the door.

--furious

posted by: furious on 07.09.07 at 09:36 AM [permalink]



I'm kinda late to this thread but I was just reading a book review from a couple of years back by Joseph Epstein that hits it just about right. He was reviewing a book called, "Faculty Towers: The Academic Novel and Its Discontents" by Elaine Showalter. Epstein writes:

'Professor Showalter does not go in much for discussing the sex that is at the center of so many academic novels. Which reminds me that the first time I met Edward Shils, he asked me what I was reading. When I said The War Between the Tates by Alison Lurie, he replied, "Academic screwing, I presume." He presumed rightly. How could it be otherwise with academic novels? Apart from the rather pathetic power struggles over department chairmanships, or professorial appointments, love affairs, usually adulterous or officially outlawed ones, provide the only thing resembling drama on offer on the contemporary university campus.'

posted by: craig mclaughlin on 07.09.07 at 09:36 AM [permalink]



cqxeh pastb cqektzair ekza dlpob jmsvetf zkta

posted by: tqxlcvhp tfsrxqkao on 07.09.07 at 09:36 AM [permalink]






Post a Comment:

Name:


Email Address:


URL:




Comments:


Remember your info?