Wednesday, August 1, 2007

previous entry | main | next entry | TrackBack (0)


At least the Club for Growth is realistic

The Washington Post reports that Congress is preparing to pass a really stupid, counterprouctive bill to punish China.

In the meanwhile, over a thousand economists have signed the following:

We, the undersigned, have serious concerns about the recent protectionist sentiments coming from Congress, especially with regards to China.

By the end of this year, China will most likely be the United States' second largest trading partner. Over the past six years, total trade between the two countries has soared, growing from $116 billion in 2000 to almost $343 billion in 2006. That's an average growth rate of almost 20% a year.

This marvelous growth has led to more affordable goods, higher productivity, strong job growth, and a higher standard of living for both countries. These economic benefits were made possible in large part because both China and the United States embraced freer trade.

As economists, we understand the vital and beneficial role that free trade plays in the world economy. Conversely, we believe that barriers to free trade destroy wealth and benefit no one in the long run. Because of these fundamental economic principles, we sign this letter to advise Congress against imposing retaliatory trade measures against China.

There is no foundation in economics that supports punitive tariffs. China currently supplies American consumers with inexpensive goods and low-interest rate loans. Retaliatory tariffs on China are tantamount to taxing ourselves as a punishment. Worse, such a move will likely encourage China to impose its own tariffs, increasing the possibility of a futile and harmful trade war. American consumers and businesses would pay the price for this senseless war through higher prices, worse jobs, and reduced economic growth.

We urge Congress to discard any plans for increased protectionism, and instead urge lawmakers to work towards fostering stronger global economic ties through free trade.

This also appears in an ad today in the Wall Street Journal.

As Greg Mankiw sadly observes, petitions like this have very little political effect. Indeed, by linking to this older petition, the Club for Growth recognizes this as well.

posted by Dan on 08.01.07 at 08:27 AM




Comments:

I'm a "Reagan Republican," and I think The Club for Growth is a bunch of dittohead hacks.

Shouting cliches has replaced conservative thought.

Freer trade has not worked as advertised, except for perhaps the top 20% of Americans.
As long as the free traders refuse to admit this, there will be poltical problems.

posted by: save_the_rustbelt on 08.01.07 at 08:27 AM [permalink]



There's a difference between "Freer trade has not worked as advertised" and Freer trades does not work at all and therefore the US should resort to protectionism. There's an interesting podcast that touches on some of these issues: http://www.econtalk.org/archives/2007/07/henderson_on_di.html.

Many manufacturing jobs were likely "outsourced" to automation by technology, not to China. If you want those jobs back, you will have a more convincing case proposing barriers to technology. Perhaps a high innovation tax and quotas on the amount of efficiency a business can employ.

While people often claim that the US stopped making things, the GDP data shows otherwise: http://www.bea.gov/bea/newsrel/gdpind05_revchart2.gif. Less manufacturing jobs, but a growing output of domestic goods. That's a productivity issue, not a trade issue.

posted by: Jason on 08.01.07 at 08:27 AM [permalink]



I'd just like to know how free trade is going to "solve" China. I've heard arguments that as prosperity comes they will naturally figure out things like free speech and not repressing people, but I don't buy it. So what to do? Not that tariffs are the way to go, but it seems reasonable to me that before we happily give them a helping hand in overtaking us as the world superpower we'd better know what we're doing. Maybe it's worth harming our economy to harm theirs, for political reasons. Seriously, I'm hoping to be corrected, but despite the apparent ignorance of politicians' economic meddling, economists don't seem to have answers to the questions we actually care about.

Relatedly, are there any organizations devoted to recommending how to use economic policy wisely? e.g. Is it ever appropriate to use tariffs? Is there something else that would do the intended trick? What's good about EITC? etc.

posted by: Mike on 08.01.07 at 08:27 AM [permalink]



I'd just like to know how free trade is going to "solve" China. I've heard arguments that as prosperity comes they will naturally figure out things like free speech and not repressing people, but I don't buy it. So what to do? Not that tariffs are the way to go, but it seems reasonable to me that before we happily give them a helping hand in overtaking us as the world superpower we'd better know what we're doing. Maybe it's worth harming our economy to harm theirs, for political reasons. Seriously, I'm hoping to be corrected, but despite the apparent ignorance of politicians' economic meddling, economists don't seem to have answers to the questions we actually care about.

Relatedly, are there any organizations devoted to recommending how to use economic policy wisely? e.g. Is it ever appropriate to use tariffs? Is there something else that would do the intended trick? What's good about EITC? etc.

posted by: Mike on 08.01.07 at 08:27 AM [permalink]



Perhaps you should suggest the US set its own RMB/USD exchange rate at a lower level and duke it out. Let's see how creative the Chinese would be at sneaking money out of China.

posted by: Lord on 08.01.07 at 08:27 AM [permalink]



I'd just like to know how free trade is going to "solve" China. I've heard arguments that as prosperity comes they will naturally figure out things like free speech and not repressing people, but I don't buy it. So what to do?

I'm not sure I buy it either, but surely it is better that the Chinese people are just politically repressed rather than both dirt poor AND politically repressed, isn't it? And, from a geopolitical standpoint, isn't it far better for China to be deeply integrated into the world economy (and, therefore, have much to lose from conflict) than isolated?

posted by: Slocum on 08.01.07 at 08:27 AM [permalink]






Post a Comment:

Name:


Email Address:


URL:




Comments:


Remember your info?





Politics, economics, globalization, academia, pop culture... all from a untenured tenured perspective

Main home page
Main blog page
About Me
Search My Blog
Favorite Blogs
Book Recommendations
Books of the Month (Summer 2008)






Reviews of DanielDrezner.com:

"Sharp but informal commentary on politics and foreign policy." -- The New Republic

"Dan Drezner is terrific.... Excellent blog." -- Andrew Sullivan

"Dan's stuff is always worth reading." -- Eugene Volokh

"One of the essential weblogs." -- Gawker.com

"Old battle horse of the blogosphere." -- Jewcy.com

"Soft porn." -- Amitai Etzioni

"Spawned grave atrocities and vast destruction." -- Glenn Greenwald

"Monday morning quarterback... conservative robot... the very foundation of troubles in this country." -- not-so-random readers


Contact me at:
ddrezner@gmail.com
(But click here to read my e-mail policy)









Search the Site


Try advanced site search









Favorite Blogs

TNR's Open University
Jacob Levy
Glenn Reynolds
Andrew Sullivan
Mickey Kaus
Virginia Postrel
The Volokh Conspiracy
Josh Marshall
Crooked Timber
OxBlog
Real Clear Politics
Kevin Drum
Across the Aisle
Economist's Free Exchange
TNR's The Plank
NRO's The Corner
TAP's Tapped
America Abroad
Duck of Minerva
Opinio Juris
Brad DeLong

Jeff Jarvis
Mystery Pollster
Mark Kleiman
Meryl Yourish
Megan McArdle
Marginal Revolution
Michael Munger
Chris Lawrence
Matthew Yglesias
Hit and Run
Cold Spring Shops
Stephen Green
Outside the Beltway
Pejman Yousefzadeh
Laura McKenna (11D)
Elected Swineherd
Phil Carter
Joe Gandelman
Winds of Change
Andrew Samwick
Greg Mankiw
Dani Rodrik
Roger L. Simon
Tom Maguire
Greg Djerejian
The American Scene
Post Global
Democracy Arsenal




Recent articles online

"Foreign Policy Goes Glam."
The National Interest, November/December 2007

"Rise of the Hipster Statesmen."
Newsweek International, November 1, 2007

"The New New World Order."
Foreign Affairs, March/April 2007

"Mind the Gap."
The National Interest, January/February 2007

"The Grandest Strategy Of Them All."
Washington Post, December 17, 2006

U.S. Trade Strategy: Free Versus Fair
Council on Foreign Relations Press, September 2006.

Complete online article archive




Blog Archives

June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002

Academia
Area studies
Book club
culture
economics
fence-sitting
from Blogger
globalization
homeland security
international relations
law
Mediasphere
My very important posts
New Republic
outsourcing
personal
politics
Sports
The blog paper
the blogosphere
thesis ideas
Trade and Development
U.S. foreign policy
website maintenance

See full archives listing




Recent Entries

Someone keep Fleet Street away from Bill Clinton
It rivals Buckley vs. Vidal, I tell you
So.... are the Clintons morons?
The New York Times didn't ask me, but then again, that's why I have this blog
Monica Crowley's jet black pot
Al Qaeda is losing
Speaking of karma....
The blog post that writes itself
What made me laugh today
Where should Hillary go?




Site Credits