Thursday, August 9, 2007
previous entry | main | next entry | TrackBack (0)
Is Nick Kristof insane?
A popular definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results (intriguingly, the same website attributes this definition to both Benjamin Franklin and Albert Einstein).
That definition came back to me after reading the opening of Nick Kristof's NYT ($$) column today:
Almost nobody has campaigned so energetically for the poor in Africa as Bono, but when Bono spoke at a conference in Africa recently, he was heckled. Several Africans scolded him for demanding more foreign aid, saying that’s not what Africa needs.You can see why I would question Kristof's mental status.
To be fair, however, Kristof would argue that he's not proposing doing the same thing again. The rest of his essay basically argues that while the macro picture suggests aid does not work, the concentration of aid into certain sectors (health and education) and focused programs (the Millennium Challenge Account) has yielded greater gains (eradication of smallpox, etc.).
He has a point, but it's not as big a point as he thinks. Yes, health initiatives have yielded some impressive results, but they're often subject to similar screw-ups. As William Easterly pointed out in The White Man's Burden, foreign aid has distorted efforts to combat the spread of AIDS. By focusing on treatment of those already suffering from HIV, there has been underinvestment in public goods that would get a bigger bang for the buck -- like efforts to prevent the spread of AIDS or to encourage vaccination for other diseases.
So Kristof is not insane... but he might be a little funny in the head.
posted by Dan on 08.09.07 at 02:01 PM
I don't think it's just an issue of concentration. Kristoff is using metrics other than economic growth, e.g. health. Such an assertion is still falsifiable.
William Easterly's argument is on point but isn't doesn't have the same level of support that arguments against an aid-growth connection do.posted by: Greg Sanders on 08.09.07 at 02:01 PM [permalink]
It's Kristof - one f.
Neil: Oops. Thanks. Consider the extra F redacted.posted by: Greg Sanders on 08.09.07 at 02:01 PM [permalink]
Post a Comment: