![]() |
|
Monday, August 27, 2007
previous entry | main | next entry | TrackBack (0)
John Dickerson sums it up for me
In the wake of Alberto Gonzales' resignation, John Dickerson has a Slate column that nicely summarizes a big deficit in Bush's managerial style: The personnel failures make it very hard for Bush fans to defend the president because they so deeply undermine the tenets of his management style as he articulates it. Bush has often talked in almost mystical terms about his ability to take the measure of people by looking them in the eye. His most infamous snap judgment, early in his first term, was peeking into the soul of Vladimir Putin and finding goodness. But even with years of presidential experience, he continues to make terrible judgments about the aptitudes of his own staffers. Harriet Miers and Alberto Gonzales may be very nice people, but they were never competent for the jobs Bush wanted them to have.This has undoubtedly been a key failing of Bush's managerial style. But it's hardly the only one. posted by Dan on 08.27.07 at 02:20 PM Comments: Alberto Gonzalez, one of the cabal who gave 'legal' cover for the gov't to constantly violate our rights: And it only seems like yesterday that this administration was being lauded as the most MBA heavy in history - the first president with an MBA! From my experience in the topsy turvy real world of capitalism in the private sector, GW doesn't seem that atypical from a lot of MBA types I've worked with and for. They almost to a person have the same divergence between their image - i.e. an emotionless, analytical decision making machine - and the reality - i.e. heavily invested in their carefully manicured networks, basing decisions about things they cannot possibly comprehend on what the crop of sycophants that they have unconsciously accumulated whisper in their ears. I don't think this is a failing of Bush so much as the religious like belief that conservatives put into the whole "running government like a business" mythos. He's simply a product of his environment. Y'all should really own up to this crap... Facing failures rather than pawning them off on scapegoats is the only way to improve the system, after all. Sloughing this off as merely Bush's failure seems like a rather blinkered and tragically limited view of reality. But what the hey. It's not like this isn't a constant feature. posted by: Hal on 08.27.07 at 02:20 PM [permalink]These are criticisms from people who've done what? posted by: Thomas Esmond Knox on 08.27.07 at 02:20 PM [permalink]Tom, That's not really a rebuttal. "I'd like to see you be a better President" is hardly fit for anything outside the schoolyard. -Troll posted by: Troll on 08.27.07 at 02:20 PM [permalink]I'm with Hal, in my long experience the more elite the MBA........... 1) the bigger the ego John Dickerson writes "Donald Rumsfeld, Harriet Miers, and Michael Brown—animated failures who could not be controlled or improved with good public relations". In my opinion an administration that can "control" it's members or can use "public relations" to improve them are bigger failures than an administration that sticks by imperfect people acting in a time of crisis. As for his choice of targets Rumsfeld and Gonzales made tough decisions to fight the war on terror. Both are intelligent and accomplished (Rumsfeld much more so) men. We can never prove if they were more right than wrong. Michael Brown was stuck with a giant mess not only from Katrina (a rare category 5 hurricane) but an infrastructure laid waste by local officials corruption and incompetence. Look at the post Brown FEMA--millions of dollars disappeared through fraud, corruption and incompetence. Harriet Meirs was not proven incompetent only that she did not have commonly acceptable qualifications for the supreme court. This kind of critique is just part of the game of journalists versus politicians. Where the journalists always win because the journalists make up the rules. Good politicians play to win the real game. What does "animated failure" mean anyway? posted by: Tim H on 08.27.07 at 02:20 PM [permalink]test posted by: Zathras on 08.27.07 at 02:20 PM [permalink]Let's keep in mind, shall we, that anyone capable of making that cretinous statement about Putin is capable of damn near any kind of irrational misjudgment? posted by: Bruce Moomaw on 08.27.07 at 02:20 PM [permalink]Post a Comment: |
Politics, economics, globalization, academia, pop culture... all from a
Main home page Reviews of DanielDrezner.com: "Sharp but informal commentary on politics and foreign policy." -- The New Republic "Dan Drezner is terrific.... Excellent blog." -- Andrew Sullivan "Dan's stuff is always worth reading." -- Eugene Volokh "One of the essential weblogs." -- Gawker.com "Old battle horse of the blogosphere." -- Jewcy.com "Soft porn." -- Amitai Etzioni "Spawned grave atrocities and vast destruction." -- Glenn Greenwald "Monday morning quarterback... conservative robot... the very foundation of troubles in this country." -- not-so-random readers Contact me at: ddrezner@gmail.com (But click here to read my e-mail policy) Search the Site TNR's Open University Jacob Levy Glenn Reynolds Andrew Sullivan Mickey Kaus Virginia Postrel The Volokh Conspiracy Josh Marshall Crooked Timber OxBlog Real Clear Politics Kevin Drum Across the Aisle Economist's Free Exchange TNR's The Plank NRO's The Corner TAP's Tapped America Abroad Duck of Minerva Opinio Juris Brad DeLong Jeff Jarvis Mystery Pollster Mark Kleiman Meryl Yourish Megan McArdle Marginal Revolution Michael Munger Chris Lawrence Matthew Yglesias Hit and Run Cold Spring Shops Stephen Green Outside the Beltway Pejman Yousefzadeh Laura McKenna (11D) Elected Swineherd Phil Carter Joe Gandelman Winds of Change Andrew Samwick Greg Mankiw Dani Rodrik Roger L. Simon Tom Maguire Greg Djerejian The American Scene Post Global Democracy Arsenal Recent articles online "Foreign Policy Goes Glam."The National Interest, November/December 2007 "Rise of the Hipster Statesmen." Newsweek International, November 1, 2007 "The New New World Order." Foreign Affairs, March/April 2007 "Mind the Gap." The National Interest, January/February 2007 "The Grandest Strategy Of Them All." Washington Post, December 17, 2006 U.S. Trade Strategy: Free Versus Fair Council on Foreign Relations Press, September 2006. Complete online article archive Blog Archives June 2008May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 Academia Area studies Book club culture economics fence-sitting from Blogger globalization homeland security international relations law Mediasphere My very important posts New Republic outsourcing personal politics Sports The blog paper the blogosphere thesis ideas Trade and Development U.S. foreign policy website maintenance See full archives listing Recent Entries • Someone keep Fleet Street away from Bill Clinton• It rivals Buckley vs. Vidal, I tell you • So.... are the Clintons morons? • The New York Times didn't ask me, but then again, that's why I have this blog • Monica Crowley's jet black pot • Al Qaeda is losing • Speaking of karma.... • The blog post that writes itself • What made me laugh today • Where should Hillary go? Site Credits |