![]() |
|
Monday, September 17, 2007
previous entry | main | next entry | TrackBack (0)
What will Iran do in Iraq?
A common objection to any kind of U.S. withdrawal from Iraq is that it's a gift to Iran. Iran is actively meddling in Iraq's politics as we speak. Should U.S. forces go over the horizon, the prospect of a powerful Iran and a subordinate Iraq stokes fears of a Shiite superstate in the region. Is this how things will actually play out? Consider what is heppening now in Basra. The Christian Science Monitor's Sam Dagher reports on how Iraq's second-largest city is doing in the wake of the British exit from the city earlier this month. To get a sense of how fractious the place is, here's Dagher's guide to the key players in the region: Sadrists and Mahdi Army: The movement of radical cleric Moqtada al-Sadr is a formidable force in Basra. The Mahdi Army is estimated to number 17,000 in the province. Security officials say that some of the Basra militia are infiltrated by Iran and beholden to Tehran. It opposes a super-Shiite region, but supports the ouster of the Fadhila governor.Read the whole thing. A few facts are quite clear: 1) Iran is playing a very active supporting role; 2) Iran does not appear to be playing a unifying role. The Monitor story suggests that this is because it lacks the capacity to do so: Although Iran is closest to the council and its affiliate parties like Badr and Sayed al-Shuhada, it's also backing many other Shiite groups in southern Iraq including those that are openly using violence to oppose British and coalition troops, according to Ali Ansari, an Iran specialist at London's Chatham House.There's an alternative interpretation -- it's possible that Iran lacks the interest. A fractious Iraq can serve as a buffer for Iran without triggering a security dilemma with Saudi Arabia or other Sunni states. The Basra story is still developing, of course. Still, one wonders whether Tehran will be any more adept at nation-building in Iraq than the United States. posted by Dan on 09.17.07 at 08:13 AMComments:
If the limiting factor to Iran's influence is the fractiousness of Iraqi Shiites, then an event that served to dampen those differences and rally pro-Iranian / anti-American sentiment among Iraqis might give Iran considerably more freedom of action. A very key question would be the reaction of al-Sadr and of the Maliki government itself. They'd be in a position to facilitate plenty of Iranian mischief if they decided to do so in the wake of US military strikes on Iran. The answer might be that there wouldn't be much sympathy from Iraqi Shiites, but then again, there might be. I've seen other news accounts that suggest forces in DC have concluded the Iranians can't do much more than they are already, but I'd be very cautious in assumign the same constraints apply _after_ the US has unleashed Son-of-Shock-And-Awe on Tehran. posted by: anIRprof on 09.17.07 at 08:13 AM [permalink]How confident should we be that the Iranian government has a single, unified policy on Iraq, complete with strategic objectives and plans for all likely contingencies? Were I confident myself I would not have posed the question. Confidence in the existence of such a unified Iranian policy toward Iraq would require that one believe the Iranians had a better idea than everyone else in 2003 what a mess Iraq would become in 2007. It would require the assumption that policy toward Iran's neighbor and traditional enemy was not a major factor in Iranian domestic politics (which are more than a little opaque to non-Iranians). And it would require one to believe that an Iranian consensus exists as to what kind of Iraqi state is a) possible and b) in Iran's best interests. There seems no good reason to think that any of these things is true. What other possibilities are there? Lots of them, and I attempt to guess which one is closest to the truth. But Iran would not be the first country in history (or the only one today) to react to what appears to be a short-term opportunity on behalf of short-term objectives, with some parts of its government engaged in activities of which the others are only partially aware, and with all political players preoccupied by how their own domestic position is affected by what happens beyond their country's borders. It is not unusual, historically speaking, for countries in that position to find themselves reacting to events and the importunities of nominal clients. posted by: Zathras on 09.17.07 at 08:13 AM [permalink]I do NOT attempt to guess which possibility is most likely. No way. No guessing allowed, ever. Only the untimely coincidence of my writing the initial post here with my attempt to steam broccoli without enough water in the pot produced the appearance of guessing. posted by: Zathras on 09.17.07 at 08:13 AM [permalink]Of course Iran would be better at nation building. They'd set up a dictatorship and kill everyone who doesn't agree with them. posted by: David Pinto on 09.17.07 at 08:13 AM [permalink]Post a Comment: |
Politics, economics, globalization, academia, pop culture... all from a
Main home page Reviews of DanielDrezner.com: "Sharp but informal commentary on politics and foreign policy." -- The New Republic "Dan Drezner is terrific.... Excellent blog." -- Andrew Sullivan "Dan's stuff is always worth reading." -- Eugene Volokh "One of the essential weblogs." -- Gawker.com "Old battle horse of the blogosphere." -- Jewcy.com "Soft porn." -- Amitai Etzioni "Spawned grave atrocities and vast destruction." -- Glenn Greenwald "Monday morning quarterback... conservative robot... the very foundation of troubles in this country." -- not-so-random readers Contact me at: ddrezner@gmail.com (But click here to read my e-mail policy) Search the Site TNR's Open University Jacob Levy Glenn Reynolds Andrew Sullivan Mickey Kaus Virginia Postrel The Volokh Conspiracy Josh Marshall Crooked Timber OxBlog Real Clear Politics Kevin Drum Across the Aisle Economist's Free Exchange TNR's The Plank NRO's The Corner TAP's Tapped America Abroad Duck of Minerva Opinio Juris Brad DeLong Jeff Jarvis Mystery Pollster Mark Kleiman Meryl Yourish Megan McArdle Marginal Revolution Michael Munger Chris Lawrence Matthew Yglesias Hit and Run Cold Spring Shops Stephen Green Outside the Beltway Pejman Yousefzadeh Laura McKenna (11D) Elected Swineherd Phil Carter Joe Gandelman Winds of Change Andrew Samwick Greg Mankiw Dani Rodrik Roger L. Simon Tom Maguire Greg Djerejian The American Scene Post Global Democracy Arsenal Recent articles online "Foreign Policy Goes Glam."The National Interest, November/December 2007 "Rise of the Hipster Statesmen." Newsweek International, November 1, 2007 "The New New World Order." Foreign Affairs, March/April 2007 "Mind the Gap." The National Interest, January/February 2007 "The Grandest Strategy Of Them All." Washington Post, December 17, 2006 U.S. Trade Strategy: Free Versus Fair Council on Foreign Relations Press, September 2006. Complete online article archive Blog Archives June 2008May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 Academia Area studies Book club culture economics fence-sitting from Blogger globalization homeland security international relations law Mediasphere My very important posts New Republic outsourcing personal politics Sports The blog paper the blogosphere thesis ideas Trade and Development U.S. foreign policy website maintenance See full archives listing Recent Entries • Someone keep Fleet Street away from Bill Clinton• It rivals Buckley vs. Vidal, I tell you • So.... are the Clintons morons? • The New York Times didn't ask me, but then again, that's why I have this blog • Monica Crowley's jet black pot • Al Qaeda is losing • Speaking of karma.... • The blog post that writes itself • What made me laugh today • Where should Hillary go? Site Credits |