Wednesday, October 31, 2007

previous entry | main | next entry | TrackBack (0)


A hidden utility of sports globalization?

Dani Rodrik posts about the migration of talented African football soccer players to European club teams. Here's how he tallies up the costs and benefits:

Consider that soccer fans have loyalties not only towards individual clubs but also to their national teams. So one question is what has the presence of foreign players in Europe done to the quality of the national teams. Following the disappointments of the English national team in recent games, some have suggested that the culprit is the dominance of foreign players in the Premier League and have recommended reintroducing quotas.

Or consider the quality of domestic leagues in Africa proper. The complaint that the exodus of players has hurt these leagues has been around since the 1970s. But I do not know of any serious evidence on this, and I would love to know.

In any case, it is likely that the globalization of the industry has (a) increased the quality of African national teams relative to European national teams; and (b) reduced the quality of domestic leagues in African leagues relative to club play in Europe. So how do we evaluate these outcomes in terms of what ultimately counts: the enjoyment of the fans?

If we're really thinking about the fans, then I think Rodrik is omitting a missing utility. Clearly, the migration has improved the quality of the play of European club teams. Furthermore, for most fans, the consumption of sports is a nonrival good -- i.e., I don't lose any utility from others watching or listening to a game. If African fans value high-quality play, then the decline in African domestic leagues can be offset by paying more attention to the European leagues, much like Rodrik himself.

This certainly happened with baseball, as the importation of players like Ichiro Suzuki, Hideki Matsui and Daisuke Matsuzaka have caused Japanese baseball fans to pay more attention to American baseball.

Admittedly, an improvement in the quality of a foreign sports league is not a perfect substitute for a domestic sports league. African soccer fans are much less likely to be able to attend a UEFA game than one from their local league. However, for those not actually attending the game, it's not clear to me that the consumption process is affected by where the good games are played. Indeed, the globalization of consumption suggests that the fans do not suffer as much from a decline in local sports leagues as Rodrik suggests.

Of course, I don't know if Africans actually have paid more attention to the European leagues, and this is an important data point. I hereby request all African readers of danieldrezner.com to submit comments about whether their athletic attention has migrated, along with their players, to northern latitudes.

posted by Dan on 10.31.07 at 08:56 AM




Comments:

Well i'm not African but I think the experience of Irish soccer supports your argument.

In Ireland, soccer is the most popular sport and in theory we offer very favourable conditions for players and fans alike. However, our domestic soccer league is in complete tatters. The sports institutions and organisations (the FAI and others) that deal with soccer here are incredibly badly run. It is quite a puzzle our our football league is so badly organised yet our other popular sports - Gaelic and Rugby don't suffer this fate. Our Rugby players are happy to remain in Ireland and play in domestic leagues here.

What has happened is that all our good players have left for English teams and so have the fans. It has gotten to the point that some UK clubs now have more Irish fans than English ones! This is quite unusual considering that many Irish people hold very hostile views towards England (inherited from the war of independence and the IRAs terrorist campaign). Some hardcore Irish nationalists happily follow English soccer teams and regularly travel to attend games. Institutions matter.

posted by: Michael Breen on 10.31.07 at 08:56 AM [permalink]



One of the side benefits is the exposure core fans have to other cultures, in other words I'd be real curious how much awareness of Africa and it's issues in Europe has been influenced by these imported players and as an extension what influence say Thierry Henry ( top Arsenal scorer ever ) has had on the Arsenal fans opinions of France & the French.

posted by: Nigel on 10.31.07 at 08:56 AM [permalink]



I think the remittance issue is relevant here. Dikembe Mutombo has made far more money in the NBA than he would have made had he stayed home, and this has enabled him to build a hospital (funded largely with his own money) in his home country, among other things.

posted by: nodakdude on 10.31.07 at 08:56 AM [permalink]



This was such an interesting discussion that I've addressed this post (as well as Dani Rodrik's original post and the follow-up on The Plank) on my soccer blog, The Run of Play (http://www.runofplay.com). Briefly, as an American fan of the English Premier League, I argue that there are more inhibiting factors than Dan addresses in using the quality of a foreign sports league as a replacement for a domestic one. The loss of peripheral cultural identification, I think, means that the enjoyment fans derive from watching a foreign league (and there's a lot of enjoyment, as I know very well) is always to some extent mitigated by an intangible alienation.

Yes, I said "intangible alienation." But really, it's a laugh a minute over at my blog, I promise.

posted by: Brian on 10.31.07 at 08:56 AM [permalink]




I have no personal knowledge of Africans and football, but the Economist had an article on that topic this very day...

http://www.economist.com/world/africa/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10064522

posted by: Will on 10.31.07 at 08:56 AM [permalink]



Thierry Henry is not African is West Indian.

posted by: JLS on 10.31.07 at 08:56 AM [permalink]






Post a Comment:

Name:


Email Address:


URL:




Comments:


Remember your info?





Politics, economics, globalization, academia, pop culture... all from a untenured tenured perspective

Main home page
Main blog page
About Me
Search My Blog
Favorite Blogs
Book Recommendations
Books of the Month (Summer 2008)






Reviews of DanielDrezner.com:

"Sharp but informal commentary on politics and foreign policy." -- The New Republic

"Dan Drezner is terrific.... Excellent blog." -- Andrew Sullivan

"Dan's stuff is always worth reading." -- Eugene Volokh

"One of the essential weblogs." -- Gawker.com

"Old battle horse of the blogosphere." -- Jewcy.com

"Soft porn." -- Amitai Etzioni

"Spawned grave atrocities and vast destruction." -- Glenn Greenwald

"Monday morning quarterback... conservative robot... the very foundation of troubles in this country." -- not-so-random readers


Contact me at:
ddrezner@gmail.com
(But click here to read my e-mail policy)









Search the Site


Try advanced site search









Favorite Blogs

TNR's Open University
Jacob Levy
Glenn Reynolds
Andrew Sullivan
Mickey Kaus
Virginia Postrel
The Volokh Conspiracy
Josh Marshall
Crooked Timber
OxBlog
Real Clear Politics
Kevin Drum
Across the Aisle
Economist's Free Exchange
TNR's The Plank
NRO's The Corner
TAP's Tapped
America Abroad
Duck of Minerva
Opinio Juris
Brad DeLong

Jeff Jarvis
Mystery Pollster
Mark Kleiman
Meryl Yourish
Megan McArdle
Marginal Revolution
Michael Munger
Chris Lawrence
Matthew Yglesias
Hit and Run
Cold Spring Shops
Stephen Green
Outside the Beltway
Pejman Yousefzadeh
Laura McKenna (11D)
Elected Swineherd
Phil Carter
Joe Gandelman
Winds of Change
Andrew Samwick
Greg Mankiw
Dani Rodrik
Roger L. Simon
Tom Maguire
Greg Djerejian
The American Scene
Post Global
Democracy Arsenal




Recent articles online

"Foreign Policy Goes Glam."
The National Interest, November/December 2007

"Rise of the Hipster Statesmen."
Newsweek International, November 1, 2007

"The New New World Order."
Foreign Affairs, March/April 2007

"Mind the Gap."
The National Interest, January/February 2007

"The Grandest Strategy Of Them All."
Washington Post, December 17, 2006

U.S. Trade Strategy: Free Versus Fair
Council on Foreign Relations Press, September 2006.

Complete online article archive




Blog Archives

June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002

Academia
Area studies
Book club
culture
economics
fence-sitting
from Blogger
globalization
homeland security
international relations
law
Mediasphere
My very important posts
New Republic
outsourcing
personal
politics
Sports
The blog paper
the blogosphere
thesis ideas
Trade and Development
U.S. foreign policy
website maintenance

See full archives listing




Recent Entries

Someone keep Fleet Street away from Bill Clinton
It rivals Buckley vs. Vidal, I tell you
So.... are the Clintons morons?
The New York Times didn't ask me, but then again, that's why I have this blog
Monica Crowley's jet black pot
Al Qaeda is losing
Speaking of karma....
The blog post that writes itself
What made me laugh today
Where should Hillary go?




Site Credits