![]() |
|
Wednesday, February 6, 2008
previous entry | main | next entry | TrackBack (0)
So you can see why I'm in a good mood today
As near as I can figure, the following people would have to be classified as the "losers" from Super Duper Tuesday: Ted Kennedy, Patrick Kennedy, Caroline Kennedy, John Kerry, and the African-American "establishment" in the Deep South: so much for the Kennedy's pull with either Massachusetts voters or the Hispanic community [UPDATE: Hmmm... Matt Yglesias makes a convincing case that the endorsements had some pull in Massachusetts.] And so much for the endorsements of the "establishment" African-Americans in the South swaying the black community.So it's a Super Wednesday for me. [Wait, what about bad political prognosticators?--ed.] Oh, I'm always a loser in that category posted by Dan on 02.06.08 at 08:48 AMComments: As much as I'd like to agree with you that the MA Kennedy clan were the losers, Obama did somehow make up a substantial amount of ground in MA since the endorsement (10-15 points, depending on what polls you look at). From my copious and serious research (talking to friends and family in MA), Governor Patrick actually seemed to have a bigger negative pull against Obama. Nearly everyone I spoke to said that the voted for Clinton because Patrick has been, in their eyes, a terrible Governor since running a similar campaign to Obama's (poetic rhetoric as a mask for lack of experience). And yes, I'm well aware that the plural of anecdote is not data. posted by: Carmichael Harold on 02.06.08 at 08:48 AM [permalink]Daniel, I'm not sure I get your point about the Deep South. Are you saying the A-A establishment preferred Hillary? Obama won the only two Deep South states in play last night, AL and GA. Or are you considering TN and AR to be Deep South for some reason? FWIW I loathe Kennedy and the Mass Democratic establishment, but loathe Hillary even more. posted by: Philip the Equal Opportunity Cynic on 02.06.08 at 08:48 AM [permalink]http://www.pollster.com/08-MA-Dem-Pres-Primary.php Menino's Boston machine probably helped her hold the line, but Hillary's lucky the election wasn't a week later. Either way, I think the numbers show a fairly substantial Kennedy bump (not to be confused with the trademark Colbert Bump). You could argue a similar line fairly convincingly for Latinos in California -- Obama got a couple late endorsements that helped him eat into Clinton's massive lead here, but it was too little, too late to overcome the huge initial advantage she had along with the support she got from Mayor Villaraigosa and other influential Latino politicians. posted by: Darren on 02.06.08 at 08:48 AM [permalink]Well, apparently Super Tuesday turned Obama into the establishment candidate. That is, if you believe Mark Penn: I think we'll see a lot more attempts by HRC to coopt Obama's message, and it'll be interesting to see how he fends them off. If the primaries are any indicator, roughly a third of Deep South Republicans want McCain. I doubt he has anything in his arsenal that will pry much more than a few dozen Southern Dems from Hillary or Obama. How's McCain gonna pull those states? Having someone to vote against isn't the most reliable vote-getter. posted by: Alan K. Henderson on 02.06.08 at 08:48 AM [permalink]As a Democrat, I'm getting increasingly worried. I think both Clinton and Obama have serious deficiencies as candidate--not substantively but in terms of their ability to win in the Fall. Clinton is extremely disliked by large segments of the population and Obama has little experience and seems to rely on soaring rhetoric. Conservatives might not have gotten what they want but they may have gotten what they need. And, let's face it, you can't really discount the race issue on the margins. I think McCain has a good chance to win in November; I'm torn about whether to root for McCain because he isn't as much of a nut as the other Republicans or to root against him because he might win. posted by: Marc Schneider on 02.06.08 at 08:48 AM [permalink]It isn't that the far right doesn't have pull with conservatives, but that there aren't really that many conservatives to begin with. Post a Comment: |
Politics, economics, globalization, academia, pop culture... all from a
Main home page Reviews of DanielDrezner.com: "Sharp but informal commentary on politics and foreign policy." -- The New Republic "Dan Drezner is terrific.... Excellent blog." -- Andrew Sullivan "Dan's stuff is always worth reading." -- Eugene Volokh "One of the essential weblogs." -- Gawker.com "Old battle horse of the blogosphere." -- Jewcy.com "Soft porn." -- Amitai Etzioni "Spawned grave atrocities and vast destruction." -- Glenn Greenwald "Monday morning quarterback... conservative robot... the very foundation of troubles in this country." -- not-so-random readers Contact me at: ddrezner@gmail.com (But click here to read my e-mail policy) Search the Site TNR's Open University Jacob Levy Glenn Reynolds Andrew Sullivan Mickey Kaus Virginia Postrel The Volokh Conspiracy Josh Marshall Crooked Timber OxBlog Real Clear Politics Kevin Drum Across the Aisle Economist's Free Exchange TNR's The Plank NRO's The Corner TAP's Tapped America Abroad Duck of Minerva Opinio Juris Brad DeLong Jeff Jarvis Mystery Pollster Mark Kleiman Meryl Yourish Megan McArdle Marginal Revolution Michael Munger Chris Lawrence Matthew Yglesias Hit and Run Cold Spring Shops Stephen Green Outside the Beltway Pejman Yousefzadeh Laura McKenna (11D) Elected Swineherd Phil Carter Joe Gandelman Winds of Change Andrew Samwick Greg Mankiw Dani Rodrik Roger L. Simon Tom Maguire Greg Djerejian The American Scene Post Global Democracy Arsenal Recent articles online "Foreign Policy Goes Glam."The National Interest, November/December 2007 "Rise of the Hipster Statesmen." Newsweek International, November 1, 2007 "The New New World Order." Foreign Affairs, March/April 2007 "Mind the Gap." The National Interest, January/February 2007 "The Grandest Strategy Of Them All." Washington Post, December 17, 2006 U.S. Trade Strategy: Free Versus Fair Council on Foreign Relations Press, September 2006. Complete online article archive Blog Archives June 2008May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 Academia Area studies Book club culture economics fence-sitting from Blogger globalization homeland security international relations law Mediasphere My very important posts New Republic outsourcing personal politics Sports The blog paper the blogosphere thesis ideas Trade and Development U.S. foreign policy website maintenance See full archives listing Recent Entries • Someone keep Fleet Street away from Bill Clinton• It rivals Buckley vs. Vidal, I tell you • So.... are the Clintons morons? • The New York Times didn't ask me, but then again, that's why I have this blog • Monica Crowley's jet black pot • Al Qaeda is losing • Speaking of karma.... • The blog post that writes itself • What made me laugh today • Where should Hillary go? Site Credits |