 |
|
Monday, March 3, 2008
previous entry | main | next entry | TrackBack (0)
Those naïve Brits
Via Andrew Sullivan, I see that the London Times' Sarah Baxter gets face time with Barack Obama. Some fascinating nuggets come out: Obama is hoping to appoint cross-party figures to his cabinet such as Chuck Hagel, the Republican senator for Nebraska and an opponent of the Iraq war, and Richard Lugar, leader of the Republicans on the Senate foreign relations committee.Now besides the virtue of poking Paul Kruigman with a sharp stick, I have to think that this is just one of those "let's have some fun with Fleet Street" moments in an otherwise exhausting campaign. To be sure, I suspect Obama actually will appoint at least one Republican to an important Cabinet department -- but there is zero chance of both Hagel and Lugar becoming cabinet secretaries in an Obama administration. There are simply too many Democrats who desire high-ranking positions at the Pentagon and Foggy Bottom for this to happen. Not to mention the fact that if Obama is smart, he wants Hagel and Lugar exactly where they are. They might be Republicans, but they are also GOP Senators willing to "do business" with an Obama administration in the Senate. Unless the fall election is a complete blowout (a possibility to be sure), these politicians are scarce commodities. Comments: Isn't Chuck Hagel retiring this year? A cabinet position wouldn't be that bad then. I would like to see Sam Nunn as veep. posted by: Dquartner on 03.03.08 at 08:40 AM [permalink]"Korb recalled that President John F Kennedy appointed Robert McNamara" Well, yes, and look how beautifully that worked out... I do have a good deal of respect for Hagel, however. posted by: Tony C. on 03.03.08 at 08:40 AM [permalink]There should be only one criteria for possible "defense" secretaries: Who will do the best job of reducing the size and aggressiveness of the American military? If Hagel can do that because he is a republican, then he should be at the Pentagon. If you need a peacenik-leftie, then pick someone like that. But the US military-industrial complex, and its resultant rampage of wars and destruction is such a problem for America and the world, that someone has to stop it. Hopefully Obama has the sense to see that. posted by: Joe M. on 03.03.08 at 08:40 AM [permalink]That is garbage. That is like McCain picking Lieberman for Secretary of State. Hagel, for purposes of foreign policy, is not a Republican and thus this indicates that Obama's version of bi-partisan is finding disgruntled Republicans and calling that bi-partisanship. True bi-partisanship would be an exchange of ideas and actually appointing someone who disagrees with you. posted by: Anon on 03.03.08 at 08:40 AM [permalink]Hagel could be every bit the disaster Macnamara was, but as a dove being a highly decorated vertern does not mean anything in itself whether were talking about John McCain or John Kerry (in the later's case a high suspect decorated veteran) posted by: Jozef on 03.03.08 at 08:40 AM [permalink]In addition to McNamara, JFK appointed another Republican, Douglas Dillon, to Treasury (and a third, McGeorge Bundy, as security advisor). And there were planty oif Dems looking for jobs then, too. posted by: Mr Punch on 03.03.08 at 08:40 AM [permalink]Senator Hagel might well be a worthy choice for Secretary of Defense. Franklin Roosevelt appointed Republican (and former Secretary of State) Henry Stimson Secretary of War in 1940. Stimson took a lot of heat for it from his party, but I'd say it worked out fairly well for the Red White and Blue. posted by: joelopines on 03.03.08 at 08:40 AM [permalink]Er, is everyone forgetting that that paragon of partisanship, Bill Clinton himself, appointed Bill Cohen (R-ME), as his secretary of defense? posted by: temoc94 on 03.03.08 at 08:40 AM [permalink]Why wouldn't Hagel and Lugar shoot down any such rumors during the general election. They are moderate senate republicans -- can't they basically be expected to support McCain? posted by: J Mann on 03.03.08 at 08:40 AM [permalink]Post a Comment: |
 Politics, economics, globalization, academia, pop culture... all from a
Main home page  Reviews of DanielDrezner.com: "Sharp but informal commentary on politics and foreign policy." -- The New Republic "Dan Drezner is terrific.... Excellent blog." -- Andrew Sullivan "Dan's stuff is always worth reading." -- Eugene Volokh "One of the essential weblogs." -- Gawker.com "Old battle horse of the blogosphere." -- Jewcy.com "Soft porn." -- Amitai Etzioni "Spawned grave atrocities and vast destruction." -- Glenn Greenwald "Monday morning quarterback... conservative robot... the very foundation of troubles in this country." -- not-so-random readers Contact me at: ddrezner@gmail.com (But click here to read my e-mail policy) Search the Site TNR's Open University Jacob Levy Glenn Reynolds Andrew Sullivan Mickey Kaus Virginia Postrel The Volokh Conspiracy Josh Marshall Crooked Timber OxBlog Real Clear Politics Kevin Drum Across the Aisle Economist's Free Exchange TNR's The Plank NRO's The Corner TAP's Tapped America Abroad Duck of Minerva Opinio Juris Brad DeLong Jeff Jarvis Mystery Pollster Mark Kleiman Meryl Yourish Megan McArdle Marginal Revolution Michael Munger Chris Lawrence Matthew Yglesias Hit and Run Cold Spring Shops Stephen Green Outside the Beltway Pejman Yousefzadeh Laura McKenna (11D) Elected Swineherd Phil Carter Joe Gandelman Winds of Change Andrew Samwick Greg Mankiw Dani Rodrik Roger L. Simon Tom Maguire Greg Djerejian The American Scene Post Global Democracy Arsenal Recent articles online "Foreign Policy Goes Glam."The National Interest, November/December 2007 "Rise of the Hipster Statesmen." Newsweek International, November 1, 2007 "The New New World Order." Foreign Affairs, March/April 2007 "Mind the Gap." The National Interest, January/February 2007 "The Grandest Strategy Of Them All." Washington Post, December 17, 2006 U.S. Trade Strategy: Free Versus Fair Council on Foreign Relations Press, September 2006. Complete online article archive Blog Archives June 2008May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 Academia Area studies Book club culture economics fence-sitting from Blogger globalization homeland security international relations law Mediasphere My very important posts New Republic outsourcing personal politics Sports The blog paper the blogosphere thesis ideas Trade and Development U.S. foreign policy website maintenance See full archives listing Recent Entries • Someone keep Fleet Street away from Bill Clinton• It rivals Buckley vs. Vidal, I tell you • So.... are the Clintons morons? • The New York Times didn't ask me, but then again, that's why I have this blog • Monica Crowley's jet black pot • Al Qaeda is losing • Speaking of karma.... • The blog post that writes itself • What made me laugh today • Where should Hillary go? Site Credits 
|