![]() |
|
Monday, September 22, 2003
previous entry | main | next entry | TrackBack (1)
Your John Edwards moment
Whatever the merits of Wesley Clark's decision to seek the Democratic nomination for President, Clark did succed in one area -- hogging the spotlight from John Edwards' formal announcement that he was also seeking the nomination. I don't care what Edwards says about this -- though no fault of the Edwards campaign, the timing sucked. We here at DanielDrezner.com don't think that's fair. [We don't? Does this mean we're endorsing Edwards?--ed. Absolutely not. However, I've admired some of the things he's done during the past year, and I do think the Dems are prematurely slighting his candidacy.] In response, we bring you this cornucopia of John Edwards information: Enjoy!! posted by Dan on 09.22.03 at 06:16 PMComments: I'm not sure if this is normal, but blogs from canidates really dont seem to get me as excited as maybe I should be. It's nice looking and all, but it smells of a place to post comments like "Senator Edwards this morning spoke about the issues he cares about -- the issues that face all Americans today -- on CBS Face The Nation."
The September 15th entry with pictures was rather striking to me. When I saw Mr. Edwards holding the megaphone, I immediately thought of the current President at Ground Zero a week after 9/11 and how he looked holding a megaphone. There is no comparison between the two in my opinion. Man vs. Marshmallow. posted by: King of Fools on 09.22.03 at 06:16 PM [permalink]I agree that it's unfortunate that Edwards hasn't done better. But you never know who's going to catch fire and who isn't. Edwards sure looked to me like he had a pretty good package, with only inexperience going against him (and that didn't hurt Bush in 2000) -- but something hasn't clicked. I'm not sure what. On the other hand, he's got a lot of money, so I guess I wouldn't count him out yet. How about a Clark/Edwards ticket? I bet that would keep Karl Rove up nights. I pretty much agree that candidate blogs are worthless. Dean's isn't bad, but no one else has managed to make a go of it. posted by: Kevin Drum on 09.22.03 at 06:16 PM [permalink]For a contrasting view, see this post, in which I argue that Edwards is unqualified. No relevant education, experience or accomplishments. Does he have some interesting ideas? Probably, but so do hundreds of thousands of graduate students, and they aren't qualified either. I find it curious, even in this television age, that people like Edwards are taken seriously, while a former governor with real accomplishments from the same state, Jim Hunt, is ignored. posted by: Jim Miller on 09.22.03 at 06:16 PM [permalink]Experience is overrated in politics. I'd rather have a guy with more real-world business experience than a career politician. For example, my representative, Norm Dicks (D-WA), has been embedded in this district for over 20 years, and he has NO idea about what the people here want.
Yeah, you are electing a team leader, a cheerleader, a front man for the agenda of a coalition (or a cabal, depending). Smart voters look at the whole team, but most voters vote for the frontman. cf. Arnold. posted by: xian on 09.22.03 at 06:16 PM [permalink]I'll vote for Edwards because he can talk to the dead. I dont know why he isnt channeling FDR and Kennedy for advice. posted by: Mark Buehner on 09.22.03 at 06:16 PM [permalink]Talk to the dead? GET A CLUE! I wish people would realize that Senator John Edwards...WITH AN "S"...is running for President and the guy who claims to talk to the dead is named John Edward...WITHOUT AN "S". Duhhhh... posted by: criticalwords on 09.22.03 at 06:16 PM [permalink]Criticalwords, calm yourself. It was a joke. Maybe I'll write something else later that isnt a joke and you can compare the two. posted by: Mark Buehner on 09.22.03 at 06:16 PM [permalink]Ouch. Point Buehner. posted by: Art Wellesley on 09.22.03 at 06:16 PM [permalink]Post a Comment: |
Politics, economics, globalization, academia, pop culture... all from a
Main home page Reviews of DanielDrezner.com: "Sharp but informal commentary on politics and foreign policy." -- The New Republic "Dan Drezner is terrific.... Excellent blog." -- Andrew Sullivan "Dan's stuff is always worth reading." -- Eugene Volokh "One of the essential weblogs." -- Gawker.com "Old battle horse of the blogosphere." -- Jewcy.com "Soft porn." -- Amitai Etzioni "Spawned grave atrocities and vast destruction." -- Glenn Greenwald "Monday morning quarterback... conservative robot... the very foundation of troubles in this country." -- not-so-random readers Contact me at: ddrezner@gmail.com (But click here to read my e-mail policy) Search the Site TNR's Open University Jacob Levy Glenn Reynolds Andrew Sullivan Mickey Kaus Virginia Postrel The Volokh Conspiracy Josh Marshall Crooked Timber OxBlog Real Clear Politics Kevin Drum Across the Aisle Economist's Free Exchange TNR's The Plank NRO's The Corner TAP's Tapped America Abroad Duck of Minerva Opinio Juris Brad DeLong Jeff Jarvis Mystery Pollster Mark Kleiman Meryl Yourish Megan McArdle Marginal Revolution Michael Munger Chris Lawrence Matthew Yglesias Hit and Run Cold Spring Shops Stephen Green Outside the Beltway Pejman Yousefzadeh Laura McKenna (11D) Elected Swineherd Phil Carter Joe Gandelman Winds of Change Andrew Samwick Greg Mankiw Dani Rodrik Roger L. Simon Tom Maguire Greg Djerejian The American Scene Post Global Democracy Arsenal Recent articles online "Foreign Policy Goes Glam."The National Interest, November/December 2007 "Rise of the Hipster Statesmen." Newsweek International, November 1, 2007 "The New New World Order." Foreign Affairs, March/April 2007 "Mind the Gap." The National Interest, January/February 2007 "The Grandest Strategy Of Them All." Washington Post, December 17, 2006 U.S. Trade Strategy: Free Versus Fair Council on Foreign Relations Press, September 2006. Complete online article archive Blog Archives June 2008May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 Academia Area studies Book club culture economics fence-sitting from Blogger globalization homeland security international relations law Mediasphere My very important posts New Republic outsourcing personal politics Sports The blog paper the blogosphere thesis ideas Trade and Development U.S. foreign policy website maintenance See full archives listing Recent Entries • Someone keep Fleet Street away from Bill Clinton• It rivals Buckley vs. Vidal, I tell you • So.... are the Clintons morons? • The New York Times didn't ask me, but then again, that's why I have this blog • Monica Crowley's jet black pot • Al Qaeda is losing • Speaking of karma.... • The blog post that writes itself • What made me laugh today • Where should Hillary go? Site Credits |