Friday, January 2, 2004

previous entry | main | next entry | TrackBack (5)


Being Andrew Sullivan -- day four

Sometime in the morning: Sisu e-mails me this:


beingandrew.jpg

Heh.

Midday: Is double-blogging exhausting? I've received several e-mail queries on this, and my last post might have hinted that the stress of it was getting to me.

Today disproves that hypothesis. What was stressing me out were the myriad technical problems. Blogger worked without a hitch, and I feel fine. I'm not in hyper-blog mode, so I focus mostly on foreign policy-related matters.

The ag subsidies and multilateralism posts are easy to compose because they touch on familiar themes in my writings. On the multilateral post, I hesitate on whether to link to my old TNR essay. It was written nearly a year ago, and it holds up pretty well, but then there's this sentence:

This [European] kind of multilateralism does have some use in world politics--just not when dealing with a dictator working overtime to develop weapons of mass destruction.

In light of stories like this one, prose like that makes me wince a little.

This is one of the downsides of writing a lot -- the overwhelming amount of stuff I'm going to get wrong.

1:00 PM: I've been spending a lot of time on-line in the past few months, and with the New Year I wonder if I should resolve to cut back. Then I see a link to the "Are You A Blogaholic?" quiz. Taking it, I get 60 out of 100, which is more than fifteen points above the mean. Nevertheless, I get this message:

You are a dedicated weblogger. You post frequently because you enjoy weblogging a lot, yet you still manage to have a social life. You're the best kind of weblogger. Way to go!

I start to wonder if this quiz is the functional equivalent an online "Are you an Alcoholic?" quiz -- hosted by Jose Cuervo.

11:00 PM: Despite several hours of concentrated effort, I can think of no valid reason to mention Salma Hayek on the Daily Dish.

posted by Dan on 01.02.04 at 12:35 AM




Comments:

“I waver on whether to link to my old TNR essay.”

The reality is that it only takes seconds to find the article via google.com. One merely needs to enter the following sentence:

“This [European] kind of multilateralism does have some use in world politics--just not when dealing with a dictator working overtime to develop weapons of mass destruction.” (however, you must remove the parentheses)

Oh well, here is the link:

http://www.danieldrezner.com/policy/oneforall.htm

I have a slight problem with Dan Drezner’s piece: he seems to take some of the complaints of American so-called unilateralism at face value. Our host needs to be just a bit more cynical. The Old Europeans weren’t even slightly interested in legitimate multilateralism. One must take their explicit statements with a huge grain of salt. They merely wanted to give us the middle finger. The Bush administration was placed in a no win situation. These clowns are merely immature children envious of America. It is, though, embarrassing for them to admit the obvious. Thus, they lie to themselves and pretend that their concerns are legitimate.

posted by: David Thomson on 01.02.04 at 12:35 AM [permalink]



According to your sources Salma Hayek rates as 80/100. In the wonderful world of women Salma Hayek grades out as a low B?

I am glad to see you moving on from the Pirate Grrl. Best Wishes to all Drezners in 2004!

posted by: Joseph on 01.02.04 at 12:35 AM [permalink]



I can think of no valid reason ...

Why would you NEED a reason, valid or otherwise? :)

posted by: Gary Utter on 01.02.04 at 12:35 AM [permalink]



I think it was TalkingPointsMemo that had the Pirate Grrl links. I mixed up my blogging giants.

posted by: Joseph on 01.02.04 at 12:35 AM [permalink]



Drez, hurry back.

Won't speak for anyone but myself, so let me say that I could really give a flying # about your personal angst. I'm here to be read your spin on the politics of the day, and discuss them with others with you as a first among equals - not here about what an thrill it is for you to do this or that. That's what Mrs. Drezner is for.

I'll wait for your return - for a while - but, as I said earlier, please hurry back - there being a danger in all drastic product line changes.

posted by: TommyG on 01.02.04 at 12:35 AM [permalink]



When coming from Brussels "multilateral" seems to have much the same connotation as it does when Washington speaks for the United States of America.
Maybe a truer adjective would have been "non-aligned" as in not aligned with the US.

posted by: Barry on 01.02.04 at 12:35 AM [permalink]



An evil, America-hating leftie here, wishing everyone, even you deluded righties, a Happy New Year.

And Salma Hayek is one thing we all appear to agree on.
Oh. My. Goodness.

posted by: andrew on 01.02.04 at 12:35 AM [permalink]



“And Salma Hayek is one thing we all appear to agree on. “

I’m afraid that Dan Drezner speaks only for himself concerning Salma Hayek. She is nothing more than an immature left wing goof ball. I refuse to forgive her for pushing the project glorifying Frida Kahlo. Hayek makes me sick to my stomach everytime I see her on the screen.

posted by: David Thomson on 01.02.04 at 12:35 AM [permalink]



You should adjust the Sullivan lay-out for Jan 2: there has been an error and things look messed up (scroll down).

posted by: Clinton on 01.02.04 at 12:35 AM [permalink]



What TommieG sez.

posted by: dick tuck on 01.02.04 at 12:35 AM [permalink]






Post a Comment:

Name:


Email Address:


URL:




Comments:


Remember your info?





Politics, economics, globalization, academia, pop culture... all from a untenured tenured perspective

Main home page
Main blog page
About Me
Search My Blog
Favorite Blogs
Book Recommendations
Books of the Month (Summer 2008)






Reviews of DanielDrezner.com:

"Sharp but informal commentary on politics and foreign policy." -- The New Republic

"Dan Drezner is terrific.... Excellent blog." -- Andrew Sullivan

"Dan's stuff is always worth reading." -- Eugene Volokh

"One of the essential weblogs." -- Gawker.com

"Old battle horse of the blogosphere." -- Jewcy.com

"Soft porn." -- Amitai Etzioni

"Spawned grave atrocities and vast destruction." -- Glenn Greenwald

"Monday morning quarterback... conservative robot... the very foundation of troubles in this country." -- not-so-random readers


Contact me at:
ddrezner@gmail.com
(But click here to read my e-mail policy)









Search the Site


Try advanced site search









Favorite Blogs

TNR's Open University
Jacob Levy
Glenn Reynolds
Andrew Sullivan
Mickey Kaus
Virginia Postrel
The Volokh Conspiracy
Josh Marshall
Crooked Timber
OxBlog
Real Clear Politics
Kevin Drum
Across the Aisle
Economist's Free Exchange
TNR's The Plank
NRO's The Corner
TAP's Tapped
America Abroad
Duck of Minerva
Opinio Juris
Brad DeLong

Jeff Jarvis
Mystery Pollster
Mark Kleiman
Meryl Yourish
Megan McArdle
Marginal Revolution
Michael Munger
Chris Lawrence
Matthew Yglesias
Hit and Run
Cold Spring Shops
Stephen Green
Outside the Beltway
Pejman Yousefzadeh
Laura McKenna (11D)
Elected Swineherd
Phil Carter
Joe Gandelman
Winds of Change
Andrew Samwick
Greg Mankiw
Dani Rodrik
Roger L. Simon
Tom Maguire
Greg Djerejian
The American Scene
Post Global
Democracy Arsenal




Recent articles online

"Foreign Policy Goes Glam."
The National Interest, November/December 2007

"Rise of the Hipster Statesmen."
Newsweek International, November 1, 2007

"The New New World Order."
Foreign Affairs, March/April 2007

"Mind the Gap."
The National Interest, January/February 2007

"The Grandest Strategy Of Them All."
Washington Post, December 17, 2006

U.S. Trade Strategy: Free Versus Fair
Council on Foreign Relations Press, September 2006.

Complete online article archive




Blog Archives

June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002

Academia
Area studies
Book club
culture
economics
fence-sitting
from Blogger
globalization
homeland security
international relations
law
Mediasphere
My very important posts
New Republic
outsourcing
personal
politics
Sports
The blog paper
the blogosphere
thesis ideas
Trade and Development
U.S. foreign policy
website maintenance

See full archives listing




Recent Entries

Someone keep Fleet Street away from Bill Clinton
It rivals Buckley vs. Vidal, I tell you
So.... are the Clintons morons?
The New York Times didn't ask me, but then again, that's why I have this blog
Monica Crowley's jet black pot
Al Qaeda is losing
Speaking of karma....
The blog post that writes itself
What made me laugh today
Where should Hillary go?




Site Credits