Thursday, January 27, 2005

previous entry | main | next entry | TrackBack (1)


What a long, strange, trip for Lula

When Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva ran for president in Brazil, he took great delight in railing against the Washington Consensus, the IMF, and the United States more generally. Since he's won, however, he's pursued a somewhat different course.

How different? Raymond Colitt has a story in the Financial Times that highlights the gulf between Lula then and Lula now:

For all his charisma, even Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, who came to power as the idol of Latin America's Left, found it hard to sell his orthodox economic policy at the World Social Forum in Porto Alegre, Brazil, on Thursday.


His audience of 10,000 anti-globalisation activists was already miffed at the Brazilian president's decision to attend the World Economic Forum on Friday to meet the bigwigs of capitalism they so despise.

But having to defend two years of textbook economic orthodoxy and cosy relations with the International Monetary Fund was too much for disenchanted supporters at an event launched as a challenge to Davos, Switzerland, five years ago.

As a former union leader who in the late 1970s took on big business and a military dictatorship, Mr Lula da Silva was quick to snap back at his hecklers. “That noise comes from those . . . who don't have patience to hear the truth,” he retorted, in reference to spontaneous jeering.

posted by Dan on 01.27.05 at 06:08 PM




Comments:

Lula has been quite a pain in the ass in other areas, though. He does economic things that make a little sense, and then makes huge gaffes.

The other day he said he chose the Minister of Foreign Relations because "he has dandruff on his shoulders, and that's a thing of the people". Imagine Bush saying that about Condi Rice. Not to mention that terrible affair when he tried to expel NYT correspondent Larry Rohter from the country for a story mentioning that he might have a drinking problem.

And he is still a bit too close to the authoritarian leaders around. Lula helped Chavez even before he officially took over from Fernando Henrique Cardoso. Castro is seen fondly by the ruling party -- Jose Dirceu, the Chief of Staff, actually trained as guerrilla under Castro in the 60s and 70s.

But, speaking as local here in Porto Alegre, it's not just the economic policies. The protestors get mad because of Lula's political alliances. He has support from people like ex-president Jose Sarney and powerful senator Antonio Carlos Magalhaes that are seen (rightfully, I might add) as the scum of the political earth in Brazil, representatives of the worst oligarchic traditions of "coronelismo".

posted by: Cisco on 01.27.05 at 06:08 PM [permalink]



It shows how narrow-minded those people in Porto Allegra really are. They only want to listing to things they want to hear, true or not, right or not. They could learn a thing or two from the late Robert Heilbroner: like them anti-capitalistic, but at least intellectually honest enough to compare capitalism favourably with socialism.

posted by: ivan on 01.27.05 at 06:08 PM [permalink]



It is worth noting as well that when Cardoso wanted to alter Brazil´s pension plan for government workers, the PT were the loudest critics. Of course that did not stop Lula from successfully implementing these changes.

Cisco, I couldn´t agree with you more about Sarney and especially ACM.

posted by: Randy Paul on 01.27.05 at 06:08 PM [permalink]



Just off the top of my head I'd say it might be important to make a distinction between how da Silva is viewed by international anti-globos -- who can't do him any real good but can't hurt him either -- and how he is viewed by Brazilians.

posted by: Zathras on 01.27.05 at 06:08 PM [permalink]



Zathras, there is indeed quite a distinction there. Outsiders see a success story. The lefties down here are permanently fuming over how much Lula hasn't acted like he was in 1979 (when he modeled his struggles on the Sandinists).

But these are the same people who decry any mention of free market as exploitation; who put up large banners supporting the Intifada amidst the ludicrous cries for peace; who think Chavez is admirable, specially for standing up to America.

Speaking of Chavez, an aside that hasn't anything to do with Lula: a friend of mine, living in Rio, had the police raid an apartment in his building. The neighbor, a Danish man wanted in Europe for dealing drugs, wasn't there. What was there, though, were a hundred thousand euros and a bunch of bolivares, which is Venezuelan currency. He tells the whole story here.

It might be related to the arrest reported here.

Both links are in Portuguese. I am pasting them below in case Dan's comments doesn't accept HTML tags from the commenters
http://www.insanus.org/hermano/archives/004568.html
http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/folha/cotidiano/ult95u104846.shtml

posted by: Cisco on 01.27.05 at 06:08 PM [permalink]



But then who doubts that Lula would be reelected in an eyeblink if the presidential elections were today? Hell, I am for PSDB, but I probably would vote for him. Lula is all that the PSDB was supposed to be but never was because of their stupid alliances (probably because they are more left leaning than the PSDB so the alliances could not push it so much to the center/right).

Sure the PT in power screws some things. They seem to have a hard time with anything related with free press and free speach, which really sucks, but isn't all that surprising (at least to me)in a party that was pretty much communist some time ago.

About ACM and Sarney... well, if we take a hard look at history, the kind of interests that they represent manage to stay in power no matter what since at last the end of WW II (UDN > PDS > PMDB/PFL). I can't really blame Lula, he needs working majorities in Congress and this is the only way he can get them.

posted by: Alves on 01.27.05 at 06:08 PM [permalink]






Post a Comment:

Name:


Email Address:


URL:




Comments:


Remember your info?





Politics, economics, globalization, academia, pop culture... all from a untenured tenured perspective

Main home page
Main blog page
About Me
Search My Blog
Favorite Blogs
Book Recommendations
Books of the Month (Summer 2008)






Reviews of DanielDrezner.com:

"Sharp but informal commentary on politics and foreign policy." -- The New Republic

"Dan Drezner is terrific.... Excellent blog." -- Andrew Sullivan

"Dan's stuff is always worth reading." -- Eugene Volokh

"One of the essential weblogs." -- Gawker.com

"Old battle horse of the blogosphere." -- Jewcy.com

"Soft porn." -- Amitai Etzioni

"Spawned grave atrocities and vast destruction." -- Glenn Greenwald

"Monday morning quarterback... conservative robot... the very foundation of troubles in this country." -- not-so-random readers


Contact me at:
ddrezner@gmail.com
(But click here to read my e-mail policy)









Search the Site


Try advanced site search









Favorite Blogs

TNR's Open University
Jacob Levy
Glenn Reynolds
Andrew Sullivan
Mickey Kaus
Virginia Postrel
The Volokh Conspiracy
Josh Marshall
Crooked Timber
OxBlog
Real Clear Politics
Kevin Drum
Across the Aisle
Economist's Free Exchange
TNR's The Plank
NRO's The Corner
TAP's Tapped
America Abroad
Duck of Minerva
Opinio Juris
Brad DeLong

Jeff Jarvis
Mystery Pollster
Mark Kleiman
Meryl Yourish
Megan McArdle
Marginal Revolution
Michael Munger
Chris Lawrence
Matthew Yglesias
Hit and Run
Cold Spring Shops
Stephen Green
Outside the Beltway
Pejman Yousefzadeh
Laura McKenna (11D)
Elected Swineherd
Phil Carter
Joe Gandelman
Winds of Change
Andrew Samwick
Greg Mankiw
Dani Rodrik
Roger L. Simon
Tom Maguire
Greg Djerejian
The American Scene
Post Global
Democracy Arsenal




Recent articles online

"Foreign Policy Goes Glam."
The National Interest, November/December 2007

"Rise of the Hipster Statesmen."
Newsweek International, November 1, 2007

"The New New World Order."
Foreign Affairs, March/April 2007

"Mind the Gap."
The National Interest, January/February 2007

"The Grandest Strategy Of Them All."
Washington Post, December 17, 2006

U.S. Trade Strategy: Free Versus Fair
Council on Foreign Relations Press, September 2006.

Complete online article archive




Blog Archives

June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002

Academia
Area studies
Book club
culture
economics
fence-sitting
from Blogger
globalization
homeland security
international relations
law
Mediasphere
My very important posts
New Republic
outsourcing
personal
politics
Sports
The blog paper
the blogosphere
thesis ideas
Trade and Development
U.S. foreign policy
website maintenance

See full archives listing




Recent Entries

Someone keep Fleet Street away from Bill Clinton
It rivals Buckley vs. Vidal, I tell you
So.... are the Clintons morons?
The New York Times didn't ask me, but then again, that's why I have this blog
Monica Crowley's jet black pot
Al Qaeda is losing
Speaking of karma....
The blog post that writes itself
What made me laugh today
Where should Hillary go?




Site Credits