![]() |
|
Thursday, March 17, 2005
previous entry | main | next entry | TrackBack (1)
Rob Portman has his work cut out for him
The Bush appointments just keep on coming. Reuters reports that Bush has picked his next U.S. Trade Representative:
Here's the complete text of Bush's announcement. Both the President and Rep. Portman made nice sounds on trade expansion:
[So does this mean you remain hopeful that trade will be freer?--ed. Well, I see this appointment as a good news-bad news kind of situation. The good news is that Portman is a legitimate free trader. Daniel Griswold at the Cato Institute's Center for Trade Policy Studies just published a briefing paper looking at Congressional attitudes towards trade, and Portman is categorized as a consistent free trader (his one major lapse was support for the steel tariffs). The bad news is that, while I don't know the extent of the personal relationship between Portman and Bush, Developing.... UPDATE: Thanks to D.J. for this Capitol Hill Blue link from mid-2004 which suggests that Portman and Bush are actually pretty tight: "Among other members of Bush's brain trust are Vice President Dick Cheney; a brother, Florida Gov. Jeb Bush; longtime adviser Karen Hughes; and Ohio Rep. Rob Portman, a longtime Bush family friend.... Portman, the only alumnus of the first Bush administration serving in Congress, is actively involved in Bush's strategy in industrial battleground states like his own." So maybe my "bad news" concerns are misplaced. posted by Dan on 03.17.05 at 11:59 AMComments: Drezner says: "The bad news is that, while I don't know the extent of the personal relationship between Portman and Bush, I have to guess that it's not terribly close." In fact, I think the opposite is true. By all accounts, Bob Portman is a longtime friend of the Bush family. He was the director of the Office of Legislative Affairs in the Bush I administration, and was a member of W's small, inside circle of advisors in the '04 campaign. Check out this article as a sample: http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/printer_4271.shtml Of course I don't know much more than I read in the press. But the Portman appointment seems to be another instance of Bush appointing loyalists with a private line to the Oval Office to his second cabinet. I think this is a good day for free trade. posted by: D.J. on 03.17.05 at 11:59 AM [permalink]This is right. Portman was well liked in the first Bush White House and has been an able Representative in a House GOP caucus where ability is conspicuous by its rarity. The major elected officials in Ohio are all Republicans who aren't going anywhere, so Portman was open to a new challenge. This is a good appointment, aimed at securing Congressional approval for the trade agreements Zoellick negotiated. Portman will have his hands full, but if he succeeds will punch a key ticket for his own political future. The downside of Portman's appointment will show up later, when he tries to negotiate additional trade agreements and manuever the United States through the Doha multilateral talks. No USTR negotiates all his own agreements, of course, but Portman has never done this kind of thing before, and Zoellick left enormous shoes to fill. Having said that, though, if Congress were to reject CAFTA or the other agreements Zoellick left on the table momentum for trade liberalization could just about disappear, so Bush is not wrong to want someone at USTR able to make Congress his priority. posted by: Zathras on 03.17.05 at 11:59 AM [permalink]Hmmmm...This seems to fall in the catagory Portman is tight with Bush. It will be interesting to see if anyone asks any emabarassing questions about the economy in Ohio, which has been devastated by NAFTA and the Chinese (and yes our governor is a dunce). An excellent analysis of manufacturing problems in WSJ early this week. Our GOP Congressmen tend to have safe seats (Oxley in my district) so they tend to represent the Business Roundtable more than voters. Ohio lost jobs the past four months, although there was a small gain for the year 2004. Still badly behind Y2000 levels. On target for a fourth consequtive personal bankruptcy record this year. Michigan is in a similar bind, although Mich is more auto related and of course has the elected crazies who have destroyed Detroit. Ohio and Michigan are so depressed few illegal aliens move here - that is depressed. Tom www.ealeygroup.com posted by: Tom on 03.17.05 at 11:59 AM [permalink]Post a Comment: |
Politics, economics, globalization, academia, pop culture... all from a
Main home page Reviews of DanielDrezner.com: "Sharp but informal commentary on politics and foreign policy." -- The New Republic "Dan Drezner is terrific.... Excellent blog." -- Andrew Sullivan "Dan's stuff is always worth reading." -- Eugene Volokh "One of the essential weblogs." -- Gawker.com "Old battle horse of the blogosphere." -- Jewcy.com "Soft porn." -- Amitai Etzioni "Spawned grave atrocities and vast destruction." -- Glenn Greenwald "Monday morning quarterback... conservative robot... the very foundation of troubles in this country." -- not-so-random readers Contact me at: ddrezner@gmail.com (But click here to read my e-mail policy) Search the Site TNR's Open University Jacob Levy Glenn Reynolds Andrew Sullivan Mickey Kaus Virginia Postrel The Volokh Conspiracy Josh Marshall Crooked Timber OxBlog Real Clear Politics Kevin Drum Across the Aisle Economist's Free Exchange TNR's The Plank NRO's The Corner TAP's Tapped America Abroad Duck of Minerva Opinio Juris Brad DeLong Jeff Jarvis Mystery Pollster Mark Kleiman Meryl Yourish Megan McArdle Marginal Revolution Michael Munger Chris Lawrence Matthew Yglesias Hit and Run Cold Spring Shops Stephen Green Outside the Beltway Pejman Yousefzadeh Laura McKenna (11D) Elected Swineherd Phil Carter Joe Gandelman Winds of Change Andrew Samwick Greg Mankiw Dani Rodrik Roger L. Simon Tom Maguire Greg Djerejian The American Scene Post Global Democracy Arsenal Recent articles online "Foreign Policy Goes Glam."The National Interest, November/December 2007 "Rise of the Hipster Statesmen." Newsweek International, November 1, 2007 "The New New World Order." Foreign Affairs, March/April 2007 "Mind the Gap." The National Interest, January/February 2007 "The Grandest Strategy Of Them All." Washington Post, December 17, 2006 U.S. Trade Strategy: Free Versus Fair Council on Foreign Relations Press, September 2006. Complete online article archive Blog Archives May 2008April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 Academia Area studies Book club culture economics fence-sitting from Blogger globalization homeland security international relations law Mediasphere My very important posts New Republic outsourcing personal politics Sports The blog paper the blogosphere thesis ideas Trade and Development U.S. foreign policy website maintenance See full archives listing Recent Entries • I'm huge in Ontario.... huge, I say• A powerful incentive to fix the comments feature on this blog • May the United States continue to be blessed with incompetent and stupid adversaries • Hillary Clinton's remaining political argument for staying in • Regarding Angelina Jolie, I'd like to deny the rough sex • Your political quote of the day • Op-ed - actual research for op-ed = blogswarm • Because it's been a while since this blog really angered feminists.... • How John McCain is not George W. Bush • A nice word for Mike Huckabee Site Credits |