![]() |
|
Tuesday, May 1, 2007
previous entry | main | next entry | TrackBack (1)
As Rogoff goes....
It's a bad, bad sign for Paul Wolfowitz when Kenneth Rogoff decides to write a satirical memo in Wolfowitz's name for ForeignPolicy.com. It's an even worse sign when he can write the following paragraph: I trust you [the staff] have not been unduly influenced by the recent letter calling for my immediate resignation, signed by forty-two former World Bank managing directors, senior vice-presidents, vice-presidents, and directors. You and I can surely see through this thinly-veiled attempt to manipulate the value of “Paul Wolfowitz resignation” claims [on TradeSports]. I want to assure you that the World Bank Internal Investigations Unit will look into this matter. If any of the letter’s signatories are found guilty of price manipulation, they will be dealt with harshly. Let’s not forget who is paying their pensions.Wolfowitz has argued that he's the victim of a smear campaign, and there's a small grain of truth to that charge in that he is not solely responsible for the current imbroglio over his paramour. However, when the staff that runs Wolfowitz's signature initiative indicates that his problems are compromising that initiative, it's time to say adieu. posted by Dan on 05.01.07 at 02:06 PMComments: Why not get a new staff? They seem more adept at politics than economics. posted by: huggy on 05.01.07 at 02:06 PM [permalink]"...there's a small grain of truth to that charge in that he is not solely responsible..." a 'small grain.' For God's sake. Anyone who reads your blog has read the backstory to this situation. At least be honest about it. Sk posted by: Sk on 05.01.07 at 02:06 PM [permalink]I suspect Wolfie and his attorneys are posturing now to make sure the size of the exit package is sufficient to ensure Wolfie's retirement dreams. The nicest thing for Wolfowitz right now would be a remote villa someplace. While a Baghdad Green Zone palace would be the easiest place for Wolfie to view the results of policies, he might pick the Riviera. Or not. Old Europe might not want him. Well, maybe a seashore villa in Croatia is available... posted by: Appalled Moderate on 05.01.07 at 02:06 PM [permalink]Agree with S.K., above. A "small grain". Please. Me: "Hey, look, the Earth is round, not flat." Prof, you missed this Agree with S.K and A.S Its not time to bid adieu. posted by: james gribble on 05.01.07 at 02:06 PM [permalink]Last evening, in a fit of boredom, I followed a link from some blog through a series of links about Wolfie, his educational background, his history, his neocon "theology" and etc. Truly, truly scary that he can have so much influence in our government, and the misadventure in Iraq is to a large extent his baby. He should have no role in our government or any government funded organization - ever again. posted by: save_the_rustbelt on 05.01.07 at 02:06 PM [permalink]Let's see... PW got his main squeeze, who had a cushy, high-paying job at the WB an even cushier, higher paying job outside the WB, using his position inside the WB to influence outside the WB... Wait a minute. We've just described how 90% of the cushy jobs in our economy are obtained. "One hand washes the other," "what goes around, comes around," "the good ol' boy's network," etc, etc, etc, describes the process. Would I like to see that sort of thing eliminated, or even discouraged? As the son of a steelworker, with zero contacts in those circles, you betcha! Will hanging PW's head on a pike at the city gates accomplish this? Not a chance. No, if Wolfie loses his job, it will be for the "reasons" save_the_rustbelt, above provides: he was a major architect of a foreign policy that a large number of people don't like. Actually firing him for what he *did* would require wholesale dismissals at the highest levels of government and industry. posted by: bud on 05.01.07 at 02:06 PM [permalink]Bud, I dont think its so much what he did, but more his ability to lead an institution preaching to others to do the opposite of what he did.... Rite? posted by: George on 05.01.07 at 02:06 PM [permalink]The fact that he was given the job in the first place is criminal. He should be an orderly at Walter Reed. posted by: Babar on 05.01.07 at 02:06 PM [permalink]Post a Comment: |
Politics, economics, globalization, academia, pop culture... all from a
Main home page Reviews of DanielDrezner.com: "Sharp but informal commentary on politics and foreign policy." -- The New Republic "Dan Drezner is terrific.... Excellent blog." -- Andrew Sullivan "Dan's stuff is always worth reading." -- Eugene Volokh "One of the essential weblogs." -- Gawker.com "Old battle horse of the blogosphere." -- Jewcy.com "Soft porn." -- Amitai Etzioni "Spawned grave atrocities and vast destruction." -- Glenn Greenwald "Monday morning quarterback... conservative robot... the very foundation of troubles in this country." -- not-so-random readers Contact me at: ddrezner@gmail.com (But click here to read my e-mail policy) Search the Site TNR's Open University Jacob Levy Glenn Reynolds Andrew Sullivan Mickey Kaus Virginia Postrel The Volokh Conspiracy Josh Marshall Crooked Timber OxBlog Real Clear Politics Kevin Drum Across the Aisle Economist's Free Exchange TNR's The Plank NRO's The Corner TAP's Tapped America Abroad Duck of Minerva Opinio Juris Brad DeLong Jeff Jarvis Mystery Pollster Mark Kleiman Meryl Yourish Megan McArdle Marginal Revolution Michael Munger Chris Lawrence Matthew Yglesias Hit and Run Cold Spring Shops Stephen Green Outside the Beltway Pejman Yousefzadeh Laura McKenna (11D) Elected Swineherd Phil Carter Joe Gandelman Winds of Change Andrew Samwick Greg Mankiw Dani Rodrik Roger L. Simon Tom Maguire Greg Djerejian The American Scene Post Global Democracy Arsenal Recent articles online "Foreign Policy Goes Glam."The National Interest, November/December 2007 "Rise of the Hipster Statesmen." Newsweek International, November 1, 2007 "The New New World Order." Foreign Affairs, March/April 2007 "Mind the Gap." The National Interest, January/February 2007 "The Grandest Strategy Of Them All." Washington Post, December 17, 2006 U.S. Trade Strategy: Free Versus Fair Council on Foreign Relations Press, September 2006. Complete online article archive Blog Archives June 2008May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 Academia Area studies Book club culture economics fence-sitting from Blogger globalization homeland security international relations law Mediasphere My very important posts New Republic outsourcing personal politics Sports The blog paper the blogosphere thesis ideas Trade and Development U.S. foreign policy website maintenance See full archives listing Recent Entries • Someone keep Fleet Street away from Bill Clinton• It rivals Buckley vs. Vidal, I tell you • So.... are the Clintons morons? • The New York Times didn't ask me, but then again, that's why I have this blog • Monica Crowley's jet black pot • Al Qaeda is losing • Speaking of karma.... • The blog post that writes itself • What made me laugh today • Where should Hillary go? Site Credits |