 |
|
Thursday, July 12, 2007
previous entry | main | next entry | TrackBack (0)
A whole-assed effort on a half-assed policy measure
In response to this post blasting the Baucus-Grassley-Schumer-Graham China bill -- and the presidential candidates who endorse it -- I received the following e-mail from a Hill staffer who shall remain very, very anonymous: Over the next few months, our committee is going to be considering trade legislation on China, including the currency issue. I've read with interest your recent blog about your concerns with the Baucus-Grassley-Schumer-Graham bill. If we accept that something needs to happen legislatively (for political, if not substantive reasons) on currency, do you have any thoughts on what a sensible piece of legislation would look like?So, the problem is that a political imperative exists to do something, but even the staffers know that the something proposed is bad, bad, bad. The task, therefore, is to devise a bill that is perceived as doing something about China but in point of fact does not seriously rupture either the bilateral economic relationship or the U.S. economy. A bonus if the policy were to actually achieve the desired end -- a slow appreciation of the yuan. Faced with this assignment, and after pleading numerous times to just do nothing, I'd offer four recommendations that might make this kind of thing look sensible: 1) Give China 18 to 24 months to achieve a quantifiable degree of appreciation (no, I'm not going to provide a number) before any measures are enacted. This kicks the can down the road for a while, and with some luck Beijing will head in that direction anyway.Please excuse me so I can wash my hands until they're clean. posted by Dan on 07.12.07 at 05:04 PM Comments: Professor: From your tenured chair on the east coast sneering is easy. Over the next 3 - 4 years we are likely to offshore another 1/2 million or so manufacturing jobs, give or take. Can those workers move in with you? Do you have any extra rooms? Free trade will continue to grow, as it should. Ignoring the damages is not very smart politically. Allowing one side to ignore the rules is just plain dumb. posted by: save_the_rustbelt on 07.12.07 at 05:04 PM [permalink]Yes, protectionism will save America. I'm sure glad we solved that problem. posted by: Robert S. Porter on 07.12.07 at 05:04 PM [permalink]I have extra rooms, and I'm happy and damn proud to offer sanctuary to hard-working immigrants, whether they are officially-approved or not. IMO I'm "paying forward" since, like everyone else except the First Peoples, my ancestors were immigrants. Now that we've cleared that up...Dr. Drezner, I understand why you feel dirty, and I respectfully submit that you should feel proud of yourself. It is the system which is dirty, and the politicians you mention who are dirty; your are not. If Oskar Schindler dealt with the Nazis in order to rescue Jews, you should be able to deal with Democrats in order to rescue economic policy. (Hmm, a reverse example of Godwin's Law?) posted by: John Fast on 07.12.07 at 05:04 PM [permalink]Uh, oh. More job outsourcing posted by: bluhawkk on 07.12.07 at 05:04 PM [permalink]"If Oskar Schindler dealt with the Nazis in order to rescue Jews, you should be able to deal with Democrats in order to rescue economic policy. (Hmm, a reverse example of Godwin's Law?)..." That has to be the most ridiculous comment on the blogosphere this week. Will all due respect to the professor (and he is one of the young stars in his field) he is not in quite the same situation as Oskar. This is not about protectionism, this is about transitions, and our whores-for-the-rich federal government. posted by: save_the_rustbelt on 07.12.07 at 05:04 PM [permalink]Best solution is actually to change our policy vis-a-vis Taiwan, call it, One China, One Taiwan. China ties trade deals to agreeing with their foreign policy. It's a great strategy because: The question is, do Democrats have the brains or the balls to do it? posted by: 8 on 07.12.07 at 05:04 PM [permalink]Revitol posted by: revitol on 07.12.07 at 05:04 PM [permalink]Post a Comment: |
 Politics, economics, globalization, academia, pop culture... all from a
Main home page  Reviews of DanielDrezner.com: "Sharp but informal commentary on politics and foreign policy." -- The New Republic "Dan Drezner is terrific.... Excellent blog." -- Andrew Sullivan "Dan's stuff is always worth reading." -- Eugene Volokh "One of the essential weblogs." -- Gawker.com "Old battle horse of the blogosphere." -- Jewcy.com "Soft porn." -- Amitai Etzioni "Spawned grave atrocities and vast destruction." -- Glenn Greenwald "Monday morning quarterback... conservative robot... the very foundation of troubles in this country." -- not-so-random readers Contact me at: ddrezner@gmail.com (But click here to read my e-mail policy) Search the Site TNR's Open University Jacob Levy Glenn Reynolds Andrew Sullivan Mickey Kaus Virginia Postrel The Volokh Conspiracy Josh Marshall Crooked Timber OxBlog Real Clear Politics Kevin Drum Across the Aisle Economist's Free Exchange TNR's The Plank NRO's The Corner TAP's Tapped America Abroad Duck of Minerva Opinio Juris Brad DeLong Jeff Jarvis Mystery Pollster Mark Kleiman Meryl Yourish Megan McArdle Marginal Revolution Michael Munger Chris Lawrence Matthew Yglesias Hit and Run Cold Spring Shops Stephen Green Outside the Beltway Pejman Yousefzadeh Laura McKenna (11D) Elected Swineherd Phil Carter Joe Gandelman Winds of Change Andrew Samwick Greg Mankiw Dani Rodrik Roger L. Simon Tom Maguire Greg Djerejian The American Scene Post Global Democracy Arsenal Recent articles online "Foreign Policy Goes Glam."The National Interest, November/December 2007 "Rise of the Hipster Statesmen." Newsweek International, November 1, 2007 "The New New World Order." Foreign Affairs, March/April 2007 "Mind the Gap." The National Interest, January/February 2007 "The Grandest Strategy Of Them All." Washington Post, December 17, 2006 U.S. Trade Strategy: Free Versus Fair Council on Foreign Relations Press, September 2006. Complete online article archive Blog Archives June 2008May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 Academia Area studies Book club culture economics fence-sitting from Blogger globalization homeland security international relations law Mediasphere My very important posts New Republic outsourcing personal politics Sports The blog paper the blogosphere thesis ideas Trade and Development U.S. foreign policy website maintenance See full archives listing Recent Entries • Someone keep Fleet Street away from Bill Clinton• It rivals Buckley vs. Vidal, I tell you • So.... are the Clintons morons? • The New York Times didn't ask me, but then again, that's why I have this blog • Monica Crowley's jet black pot • Al Qaeda is losing • Speaking of karma.... • The blog post that writes itself • What made me laugh today • Where should Hillary go? Site Credits 
|