Wednesday, October 10, 2007

previous entry | main | next entry | TrackBack (0)


Grading out the GOP debate on trade

I didn't see the GOP debate yesterday, but looking through the transcipt, I was surprised to see trade came up as an issue.

According to the Wall Street Journal's Jackie Calmes and Amy Shatz:

{S]everal [candidates] reflected skepticism about free trade that is gaining hold in both political parties. The others, while professedly free-traders, acknowledged widespread job losses as a consequence of globalism and a public sense that trading partners, particularly China, are taking advantage of the U.S.
Looking at the transcript, I think Calmes and Shatz are overinterpreting what was said.

The fringe candidates (Hunter, Tancredo) were perfectly happy to sound protectionist. But they're not going to win, so let's skip them.

Some of the mainstream candidates (Romney, Giuliani, Huckabee) had some caveats:

Romney: "We need to make sure that the Chinese begin to float their currency and they protect our designs and our patents and our technology."

Giuliani: "I think you've got to almost separate them into two different categories. There's economic protection and then there's protection for safety, security, and legal rights. And I don't think we've done a particularly good job on the second, and we have to improve those agreements. But we can't throw out the baby with the bathwater. We can't say, because these agreements weren't perfect, because they have problems, because they have issues, we're going to turn our back on free trade."

Huckabee: "the fact is, we don't have fair trade. And that's the issue we've got to address."

The other candidates (Paul, McCain, Thompson) didn't pander at all on this question. Which, of course, means they're doomed.

So, on the whole, the only possible nominee who scared me was Huckabee. The rest of the field sounded relatively sane on the topic. And, credit where it's due, Giuliani scored the best combination of sound policy and sound politics on the issue.

Oh, one last thing -- no one let Ron Paul anywhere near the Federal Reserve.

posted by Dan on 10.10.07 at 02:47 PM




Comments:

I was surprised to see trade came up as an issue

It was a debate primarily about economics, in Michigan. Why is free trade not a natural issue for that?

posted by: Shelby on 10.10.07 at 02:47 PM [permalink]



I'm sorry, about the economy -- not "economics".

posted by: Shelby on 10.10.07 at 02:47 PM [permalink]



On one level I agree with Huckabee - it's hard to see how some of our recent agreements count as FTAs. A legitimate FTA is one sentence: "My country will treat products produced overseas exactly the same as we treat products produced here." The IP-bullying of TRIPS, the countless lobbyist-induced exceptions, requirements on bank regulations, etc., are all not real trade. CAFTA, though important, was far, far away from a legitimate free trade agreement.

posted by: cure on 10.10.07 at 02:47 PM [permalink]



Cure is describing an MFN agreement, not a free trade agreement.

I do agree that the tendency to apply the label "free trade agreement" to agreements intended merely to liberalize trade can create misleading impressions of what such agreements actually do.

posted by: Zathras on 10.10.07 at 02:47 PM [permalink]



Curiously, no one really addressed the 7 year recession in Michigan, which was the reason for being in Michigan, as has been pointed out.

Oh yeah, cut taxes and blah, blah....

The GOP probably cannot win the presidency without taking either Michigan or Ohio, and both economies are still tanking (Ohio is a fraction of a percentage point out of recession now).

Even the Wall Street Journal now recognizes that the job market is hollowing and the labor force dividing to the two extremes (Wessel).

posted by: save_the_rustbelt on 10.10.07 at 02:47 PM [permalink]



Like all sane people, I too want to beat Ron Paul about the head with a copy of M. Friedman's _Monetary History_ or J.M. Keynes's _General Theory_.

On the other hand, if Ron Paul had been President, we wouldn't have gotten into this catastrophic war which you, Dr. Drezner, supported. Since this war is going to cost over $1 trillion (say it Dr. Evil style for full effect) and has also diminished our security, prestige, moral standing, and military readiness, I'd say it is a bigger deal than Rep. Paul's idiotic ideas about fiat money.

After Ron Paul ends the War on Drugs, I'm going to make my (gold) income by selling abundant quantities of opium and marijuana, while using the rest to put me out of the misery I feel when read, I dunno, Immanuel Wallerstein.

posted by: kizzle on 10.10.07 at 02:47 PM [permalink]



Ohio's economy is tanking? The GDP of the state of Ohio is equal to the continent of Australia. Don't tell the people of Delaware county or Columbus their economy is tanking--it's only the fastest growing urband and suburban area in the entire US. Michigan's economy is not tanking either. Those who have relied on gov't handouts and UAW security blankets are having a tough time, but the rest of us are doing quite well here in the state of Great Lakes & Great Times. And yes, Rusty, the state gov't was completely wrong to let the money run out in the first place and then add a bunch of new taxes to "save" us. Where's Dick Hedley when you need him?

posted by: Useless Sam Grant on 10.10.07 at 02:47 PM [permalink]






Post a Comment:

Name:


Email Address:


URL:




Comments:


Remember your info?





Politics, economics, globalization, academia, pop culture... all from a untenured tenured perspective

Main home page
Main blog page
About Me
Search My Blog
Favorite Blogs
Book Recommendations
Books of the Month (Summer 2008)






Reviews of DanielDrezner.com:

"Sharp but informal commentary on politics and foreign policy." -- The New Republic

"Dan Drezner is terrific.... Excellent blog." -- Andrew Sullivan

"Dan's stuff is always worth reading." -- Eugene Volokh

"One of the essential weblogs." -- Gawker.com

"Old battle horse of the blogosphere." -- Jewcy.com

"Soft porn." -- Amitai Etzioni

"Spawned grave atrocities and vast destruction." -- Glenn Greenwald

"Monday morning quarterback... conservative robot... the very foundation of troubles in this country." -- not-so-random readers


Contact me at:
ddrezner@gmail.com
(But click here to read my e-mail policy)









Search the Site


Try advanced site search









Favorite Blogs

TNR's Open University
Jacob Levy
Glenn Reynolds
Andrew Sullivan
Mickey Kaus
Virginia Postrel
The Volokh Conspiracy
Josh Marshall
Crooked Timber
OxBlog
Real Clear Politics
Kevin Drum
Across the Aisle
Economist's Free Exchange
TNR's The Plank
NRO's The Corner
TAP's Tapped
America Abroad
Duck of Minerva
Opinio Juris
Brad DeLong

Jeff Jarvis
Mystery Pollster
Mark Kleiman
Meryl Yourish
Megan McArdle
Marginal Revolution
Michael Munger
Chris Lawrence
Matthew Yglesias
Hit and Run
Cold Spring Shops
Stephen Green
Outside the Beltway
Pejman Yousefzadeh
Laura McKenna (11D)
Elected Swineherd
Phil Carter
Joe Gandelman
Winds of Change
Andrew Samwick
Greg Mankiw
Dani Rodrik
Roger L. Simon
Tom Maguire
Greg Djerejian
The American Scene
Post Global
Democracy Arsenal




Recent articles online

"Foreign Policy Goes Glam."
The National Interest, November/December 2007

"Rise of the Hipster Statesmen."
Newsweek International, November 1, 2007

"The New New World Order."
Foreign Affairs, March/April 2007

"Mind the Gap."
The National Interest, January/February 2007

"The Grandest Strategy Of Them All."
Washington Post, December 17, 2006

U.S. Trade Strategy: Free Versus Fair
Council on Foreign Relations Press, September 2006.

Complete online article archive




Blog Archives

June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002

Academia
Area studies
Book club
culture
economics
fence-sitting
from Blogger
globalization
homeland security
international relations
law
Mediasphere
My very important posts
New Republic
outsourcing
personal
politics
Sports
The blog paper
the blogosphere
thesis ideas
Trade and Development
U.S. foreign policy
website maintenance

See full archives listing




Recent Entries

Someone keep Fleet Street away from Bill Clinton
It rivals Buckley vs. Vidal, I tell you
So.... are the Clintons morons?
The New York Times didn't ask me, but then again, that's why I have this blog
Monica Crowley's jet black pot
Al Qaeda is losing
Speaking of karma....
The blog post that writes itself
What made me laugh today
Where should Hillary go?




Site Credits