Thursday, December 13, 2007

previous entry | main | next entry | TrackBack (0)


Open Mitchell report thread

Comment away on the imminent arrival of the Mitchell Report on performance-enhancing drugs in baseball here.

As a Red Sox fan, I have very mixed feelings about this. On the one hand, I don't want to see any players from the 2004 and 2007 World Series teams implicated in the report. No matter how you slice it, the inclusion of key names wipes some of the luster off of those victories.

On the other hand, as a baseball fan, I have to hope that at some Red Sox name shows up on the list. Why? Howard Bryant's pre-release critique of Mitchell's techniques at ESPN.com already highlights one line of attack:

Tapping Mitchell, a Red Sox director, to lead the investigation furthered suspicions around baseball that the Red Sox might be treated more favorably in his report than the other clubs. That issue came to the forefront when word leaked just before the pivotal Game 6 of October's ALCS between Cleveland and Boston, won by the Red Sox, that Indians pitcher Paul Byrd had purchased human growth hormone. A day later, Mitchell released a statement denying any involvement in the Byrd leak.

"It doesn't make a difference what they say," an American League source said regarding Mitchell. "He's one of them."

Now, I think this is a horses#$t allegation (and to his credit, Bryant later writes: "It didn't come from Mitchell," a league source said of the Byrd leak. "It's ridiculous. Does anybody think that George Mitchell would risk everything he's built over his career just to help the Red Sox win a game?") but if a sufficient number of Red Sox are named, that criticism will be defused -- which would be good for baseball.

Comment away.

UPDATE: Due to a lovely four-hour commute to travel less than 10 miles, I wound up listening to both George Mitchell and Bud Selig's press conferences. Mitchell sounded pretty good; Selig sounded like a complete ass.

Here's a link to the report itself.

As for my concern regarding the Red Sox -- hoo, boy. There were no current Red Sox players named -- but Eric Gagne got on the list! As Seth Mnookin concludes:

It turns out that the biggest favor Gagne may have done Boston is sucking ass for the second half of the season–now, at least, no one can point to him as one of the reason’s for the team’s success.
ANOTHER UPDATE: From the report itself:
A number of studies have shown that use of human growth hormone does not increase muscle strength in healthy subjects or well-trained athletes. Athletes who have tried human growth hormone as a training aid have reached the same conclusion. The author of one book targeted at steroid abusers observed that "[t]he most curious aspect of the whole situation is that I've never encountered any athlete using HGH to benefit from it, and all the athletes who admit to having used it will usually agree: it didn't/doesn't work for them.

The primary attraction of human growth hormone for athletes seeking performance enhancing effects appears to be that it is not detectable in any currently available drug test. In addition, because human growth hormone stimulates growth in most body tissues, athletes use it to promote tissue repair and to recover from injury.

So here's a question -- why care so much about HGH?

posted by Dan on 12.13.07 at 11:55 AM




Comments:

This report is going to be a preposterous joke. It is going to be 100% unverifiable hearsay (this guy told me that guy used steroids!) That anyone in the commissioner's office believed this would be a good idea, or have any kind of positive outcome is insane. It is virtually certain that some of the people the Mitchell team interviewed used this process to settle scores, and unless they release ALL of their source data, the report has to be taken as a total work of fiction.

posted by: John Jenkins on 12.13.07 at 11:55 AM [permalink]



In the short term there will be no winners in this situation, only losers. But, in the long term the fans will be winners because it will bring the entire issue into the light where it belongs. This can be the change point, beyond which lies a clean game.

posted by: Useless Sam Grant on 12.13.07 at 11:55 AM [permalink]



I think the "change point" referred to above has already come and gone. Public opinion is already that baseball is, or has been, rife with performance enhancers. This report is media fodder, and very little else.

That being said, my personal take is that opinions of teams and their accomplishments won't be affected by the report. Individual players' reputations will probably suffer, but how could I think less of a team's championship with a named player when I'm convinced that the other team had just as much abuse going on (and just didn't get caught)?

posted by: Justin on 12.13.07 at 11:55 AM [permalink]



If baseball was actually serious, they'd institute competitive cycling style drug testing.

posted by: Nicholas Weaver on 12.13.07 at 11:55 AM [permalink]



I am a far cry from a garden variety conspiracy theorist, but after reading the report I have to say the case for some pro-Red Sox tinge is kind of laying out there. No Varitek? He's been mentioned so many times in the past, and has undergone the phsycial changes we normally associate with steroid use. I dunno.

posted by: garthiorg on 12.13.07 at 11:55 AM [permalink]



I'm not that surprised not to see Varitek on the list because looking at the report, it seems like Mitchell was only able to name the players he could get through a limited amount of trainers, clubhouse guys, etc... Most of the players he names were given directly to him with evidence. I am sure he had suspicions about plenty of other players, but without the evidence, what can you actually do?

posted by: tancona on 12.13.07 at 11:55 AM [permalink]



The fact that Gagne could be juiced and STILL suck so bad is a mindblowing accomplishment in and of itself.

posted by: Phil K on 12.13.07 at 11:55 AM [permalink]



Actually, this investigation is nothing more than a wash. There was very little co-operation from the players union since they have all been trying to cover for each other.

Suddenly, we are all supposed to believe that Roger Clemens is the one of the few pitchers on steroids... GIMME A BREAK ! His HOF chances have taken a huge hit, though. Wonder what advise Clemens gave Schilling ?

The sport needs to be desperately cleaned up - the regular season needs to be cut down by a good 15 games.

posted by: NS on 12.13.07 at 11:55 AM [permalink]



I think that if one has any desire to view this as a thorough investigation, then the techniques used by the investigators is seriously suspect. Essentially, they had a couple of guys up against the wall that they were able to milk for names, and a few obvious leads that they followed up on. Catching people like Clemens, Sheffield, Barry BALCO et al is no great accomplishment, nor is it representative of the scope of the problem.

Notably, management and ownership gets more or less a free pass -- the people who acquired, monitored and traded these juicers are given only a few words to the effect that "it's everybody's fault." It seems likely that Selig likes this report because it creates the illusion of closure without in any way threatening the architecture of baseball. Thus, we get a familiar story: a few bad apples acting without the knowledge or consent of higher ups.

I really think it would be quite misguided to think that the fact that no '04 or '07 Sox were included is exculpatory. If anything, the fact that Theo grabbed Gagne despite strong evidence of his PED problem seems to undercut the idea that owners and managers (and particularly the Sox) were above the fray. I respect Theo's skills as a GM a great deal, and I find it very hard to believe that he was either unaware or that his teams were completely clean.

posted by: Skeptic on 12.13.07 at 11:55 AM [permalink]



Ah well, pitchers and catchers report to spring training in about 75 days. Hardly anyone cares about this now, no one will care by then.

posted by: Useless Sam Grant on 12.13.07 at 11:55 AM [permalink]






Post a Comment:

Name:


Email Address:


URL:




Comments:


Remember your info?





Politics, economics, globalization, academia, pop culture... all from a untenured tenured perspective

Main home page
Main blog page
About Me
Search My Blog
Favorite Blogs
Book Recommendations
Books of the Month (Summer 2008)






Reviews of DanielDrezner.com:

"Sharp but informal commentary on politics and foreign policy." -- The New Republic

"Dan Drezner is terrific.... Excellent blog." -- Andrew Sullivan

"Dan's stuff is always worth reading." -- Eugene Volokh

"One of the essential weblogs." -- Gawker.com

"Old battle horse of the blogosphere." -- Jewcy.com

"Soft porn." -- Amitai Etzioni

"Spawned grave atrocities and vast destruction." -- Glenn Greenwald

"Monday morning quarterback... conservative robot... the very foundation of troubles in this country." -- not-so-random readers


Contact me at:
ddrezner@gmail.com
(But click here to read my e-mail policy)









Search the Site


Try advanced site search









Favorite Blogs

TNR's Open University
Jacob Levy
Glenn Reynolds
Andrew Sullivan
Mickey Kaus
Virginia Postrel
The Volokh Conspiracy
Josh Marshall
Crooked Timber
OxBlog
Real Clear Politics
Kevin Drum
Across the Aisle
Economist's Free Exchange
TNR's The Plank
NRO's The Corner
TAP's Tapped
America Abroad
Duck of Minerva
Opinio Juris
Brad DeLong

Jeff Jarvis
Mystery Pollster
Mark Kleiman
Meryl Yourish
Megan McArdle
Marginal Revolution
Michael Munger
Chris Lawrence
Matthew Yglesias
Hit and Run
Cold Spring Shops
Stephen Green
Outside the Beltway
Pejman Yousefzadeh
Laura McKenna (11D)
Elected Swineherd
Phil Carter
Joe Gandelman
Winds of Change
Andrew Samwick
Greg Mankiw
Dani Rodrik
Roger L. Simon
Tom Maguire
Greg Djerejian
The American Scene
Post Global
Democracy Arsenal




Recent articles online

"Foreign Policy Goes Glam."
The National Interest, November/December 2007

"Rise of the Hipster Statesmen."
Newsweek International, November 1, 2007

"The New New World Order."
Foreign Affairs, March/April 2007

"Mind the Gap."
The National Interest, January/February 2007

"The Grandest Strategy Of Them All."
Washington Post, December 17, 2006

U.S. Trade Strategy: Free Versus Fair
Council on Foreign Relations Press, September 2006.

Complete online article archive




Blog Archives

June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002

Academia
Area studies
Book club
culture
economics
fence-sitting
from Blogger
globalization
homeland security
international relations
law
Mediasphere
My very important posts
New Republic
outsourcing
personal
politics
Sports
The blog paper
the blogosphere
thesis ideas
Trade and Development
U.S. foreign policy
website maintenance

See full archives listing




Recent Entries

Someone keep Fleet Street away from Bill Clinton
It rivals Buckley vs. Vidal, I tell you
So.... are the Clintons morons?
The New York Times didn't ask me, but then again, that's why I have this blog
Monica Crowley's jet black pot
Al Qaeda is losing
Speaking of karma....
The blog post that writes itself
What made me laugh today
Where should Hillary go?




Site Credits