![]() |
|
Monday, February 11, 2008
previous entry | main | next entry | TrackBack (0)
Should the U.S. call Chavez's bluff?
Last week, Exxon-Mobil won a court ruling against Venezuela's state oil company, PdVSA, over Hugo Chavez's expropriation of oil facilities. Bloomberg's Joe Carroll and Steven Bodzin explain: Exxon Mobil Corp. won court orders in the U.S., U.K., the Netherlands and the Caribbean freezing more than $12 billion in Venezuelan assets amid a battle over the government's seizure of oil projects.Chavez has responded to the ruling in typical Chavez fashion: President Hugo Chavez on Sunday threatened to cut off oil sales to the United States if Exxon Mobil Corp. wins court judgments to seize billions of dollars in Venezuelan assets.If Chavez were to attempt an embargo, there's no doubt that the United States would feel a twinge of pain. On the other hand, whatever twinge the U.S. felt would be mild compared to the massive spasms that would rip through Venezuela's economy from such a move -- especially since the only refineries that can handle Venezuelan oil are based in the United States. Furthermore, it's not like Venezuela's economy is all sweetness and light these days: These should be the best of times for Venezuela, blessed with the largest conventional oil reserves outside the Middle East and oil prices near record highs. But this country’s economic and social problems have become so acute lately that President Hugo Chávez is facing an unusual onslaught of criticism, even from his own supporters, about his management of the country.This is one of those situations where, if economic warfare breaks out, the U.S. holds most of the cards. I strongly suspect that Chavez's self-preservation motive will force him to back down -- but it would be kind of amusing if he believed his own bluster. posted by Dan on 02.11.08 at 08:59 AMComments: Oil is fungible. If Venezuela refuses to sell oil to the US, US oil purchasers will just buy oil somewhere else. posted by: Tracy W on 02.11.08 at 08:59 AM [permalink]To have any real impact, Venezuela would have to refuse to sell at all, not just to the United States, because, as noted in another comment, oil is fungible. To have any real impact, Venezuela would have to refuse to sell at all, not just to the United States, because, as noted in another comment, oil is fungible. Amusing? I certainly hope he backs down, but it's unlikely. Chavez is turning Venezuela into Zimbabwe. Even granting that Chavismo has some appealing elements, the way he has refashioned a stable middle-income country into a one-party (even one-man) machine is pretty dangerous. If the economy is held together with duct tape and baling wire now, imagine what it will look like if/when oil prices fall. posted by: George Wolf on 02.11.08 at 08:59 AM [permalink]Furthermore, it's not like Venezuela's economy is all sweetness and light these days I thought that point was that Venezuela's economy was never sweetness and light... it's sourness and heavy, right? ;) /bad joke posted by: John Thacker on 02.11.08 at 08:59 AM [permalink]I would pay real money to see Bush do his best Eastwood impression: Go ahead, make my day. posted by: Peter on 02.11.08 at 08:59 AM [permalink]Peter, He's already done that shtick with his "Wanted Dead or Alive" comment about bin Laden, who is probably still alive and href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/03/20020313-8.html">hasn't seemed to be wanted by the Bush administration for some time. Chavez is a blowhard who spends much of his time crying wolf. He did cut oil exports to the Dominican Republic briefly in 2003 when Carlos Andre Perez, the kleptocrat ex-president of Venezuela was living there, but that's the metier of a bully: picking on the little guys and merely talking trash to the big ones. While your post looks economically sound, I think you may have missed one small consideration: while the U.S. holds most of the cards, the currently ruling U.S. party does not. Making a decision that would exacerbate the current recession during an election year is something I suspect that they would try to avoid until there was no other option. Post a Comment: |
Politics, economics, globalization, academia, pop culture... all from a
Main home page Reviews of DanielDrezner.com: "Sharp but informal commentary on politics and foreign policy." -- The New Republic "Dan Drezner is terrific.... Excellent blog." -- Andrew Sullivan "Dan's stuff is always worth reading." -- Eugene Volokh "One of the essential weblogs." -- Gawker.com "Old battle horse of the blogosphere." -- Jewcy.com "Soft porn." -- Amitai Etzioni "Spawned grave atrocities and vast destruction." -- Glenn Greenwald "Monday morning quarterback... conservative robot... the very foundation of troubles in this country." -- not-so-random readers Contact me at: ddrezner@gmail.com (But click here to read my e-mail policy) Search the Site TNR's Open University Jacob Levy Glenn Reynolds Andrew Sullivan Mickey Kaus Virginia Postrel The Volokh Conspiracy Josh Marshall Crooked Timber OxBlog Real Clear Politics Kevin Drum Across the Aisle Economist's Free Exchange TNR's The Plank NRO's The Corner TAP's Tapped America Abroad Duck of Minerva Opinio Juris Brad DeLong Jeff Jarvis Mystery Pollster Mark Kleiman Meryl Yourish Megan McArdle Marginal Revolution Michael Munger Chris Lawrence Matthew Yglesias Hit and Run Cold Spring Shops Stephen Green Outside the Beltway Pejman Yousefzadeh Laura McKenna (11D) Elected Swineherd Phil Carter Joe Gandelman Winds of Change Andrew Samwick Greg Mankiw Dani Rodrik Roger L. Simon Tom Maguire Greg Djerejian The American Scene Post Global Democracy Arsenal Recent articles online "Foreign Policy Goes Glam."The National Interest, November/December 2007 "Rise of the Hipster Statesmen." Newsweek International, November 1, 2007 "The New New World Order." Foreign Affairs, March/April 2007 "Mind the Gap." The National Interest, January/February 2007 "The Grandest Strategy Of Them All." Washington Post, December 17, 2006 U.S. Trade Strategy: Free Versus Fair Council on Foreign Relations Press, September 2006. Complete online article archive Blog Archives June 2008May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 Academia Area studies Book club culture economics fence-sitting from Blogger globalization homeland security international relations law Mediasphere My very important posts New Republic outsourcing personal politics Sports The blog paper the blogosphere thesis ideas Trade and Development U.S. foreign policy website maintenance See full archives listing Recent Entries • Someone keep Fleet Street away from Bill Clinton• It rivals Buckley vs. Vidal, I tell you • So.... are the Clintons morons? • The New York Times didn't ask me, but then again, that's why I have this blog • Monica Crowley's jet black pot • Al Qaeda is losing • Speaking of karma.... • The blog post that writes itself • What made me laugh today • Where should Hillary go? Site Credits |